1. Shane Stevenson, Davlatbek Davlatov CAMP Kuhiston, Tajikistan

2. Risk Assessment Process
What is the purpose?
To identify hazards?
To identify vulnerability?
To identify frequency?
To evaluate the realisation of loss?
To assess success of mitigation?
To assess the impact of new mitigation?
To allow for comparisons of between all the above?
To decide on the allocation of funds?

3. CAMP’s RISK ASSESSMENT
Purpose:
To assess the potential threat of a specific hazard.
Methodology:
Through interactive participatory workshop held in the community by technical experts.

4. (Intensity* Frequency)
The Risk Assessment
Hazard Type and Location:
Relevant
Past Disasters
Hazard Triggers
(Social / Env)
Existing Mitigation
Hazard Assessment
Vulnerability
Assessment
Mitigation Proposals
(Hard / Soft) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Intensity: High
Medium
Low
Comment:
Frequency: High
Hazard
(Intensity* Frequency)
People Killed: ________
People Injured: ________
Houses Destroyed: ________
Houses Damaged: ________
Schools: ________
Health Facilities: ________
Govt Facilities: ________
Mosques: ________
Animals Killed: ________
Pasture Destroyed: ________
Orchards Destroyed: ________
Road Damaged: ________
Electricity Destroyed: ________
Drinking Water: ________
Other: : ________
High / Med / Low
New Risk Rating
Risk Assessment (Hazard * Vulnerability)
High / Medium / Low

5. Criteria: Low - 1-10 years Medium - 10-30 years High 30 < years
Frequency :
Low years
Medium years
High 30 < years
Intensity:
High
loss of life, several building damaged beyond repair
Medium
people injured, houses damaged but repairable, loss of water or electric supply, road damaged beyond repair, loss of animal life.
Low
No one injured, loss of agricultural land, road temporarily blocked.

6. The Likelihood of the Hazard Occurring
Frequency
Intensity
High
Medium
Low

7. Vulnerability Vulnerability: Next Step:
Development of a cost criteria for the potential loss. (Annex 9 - MECO)
High
loss of life, several building damaged beyond repair
Medium
people injured, houses damaged but repairable, loss of water or electric supply, road damaged beyond repair, loss of animal life.
Low
No one injured, loss of agricultural land, road temporarily blocked.

8. Final Result
Hazard
Vulnerability
High
Medium
Low

9. Usage CAMP Kuhiston - Nurobod Oxfam – Khatlon Region
Caritas – Mumimobod, Shurobod, Khovoling
Acted – Khatlon Region
Designed to work with the MECO –
The MECO was designed as a Comparative Risk Assessment between villages, but does not provide a specific in depth analysis of the cause of risk or vulnerability.