Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Giant Earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest
2
I. Introduction Earthquakes
______________ of the crust from the rapid release of stored _____________ ____________, ruptures in crust allow release
3
I. Introduction B. EQ’s & Tectonic Zones
Divergent boundaries spreading centers
4
I. Introduction 2. Transform boundaries
5
I. Introduction Convergent boundaries
6
I. Introduction C. Great or Giant Earthquakes
most often associated with _______________ _________________ EQ’s
7
Subduction Zone EQ’s
8
II. Cascadia Cascadian Subduction Zone Evidence for subduction
9
II. Cascadia 2. No Giant Quakes in Cascadia? apparent absence
historically, no biggies in last 300 years Why?
10
II. Cascadia B. Ancient Giant Quakes in PNW Evidence
esturaries & salt marshes _____________
11
Layered Cycles Draw the picture here
12
II. Cascadia 2. Dating of the Cycles
13
II. Cascadia 3. Human Record
14
II. Cascadia C. Understanding the Modern
16
II. Cascadia Results of Surveys horizontal shortening
vertical bulging
17
II. Cascadia D. Locked Subduction Zone what’s causing the clog?
18
II. Cascadia E. Locked & Loaded
19
__________________________
LOCKED & LOADED Buildup of stress = strain to leading edge _____________________________ Vertical (& horizontal) ____________________ 2. Rupture massive __________ rupture _____________ (surge of plate) ________ __________________________ 3. Subsidence behind _____________________
21
II. Cascadia F. Future Quakes energy released (magnitude) depends
extent of mega-thrust rupture B.C. to northern California? 100,000 km2 1700 quake evidence = ________________
22
Maule, Chile, 2010 Magnitude = 8.8 Depth ~ 35 km
NazcaS. America convergence ~ 7m/100 yr .07m/yr = ~7cm/yr 100km x 500km 12 m of slip
24
Chile vs. Haiti Chile, 2010 80,000 km2 fault area movement
Haiti, 2010 600 km2 Chile = 12 m slip Haiti = 5 m slip Chile __________________ more energy
27
III. Quakes and Faults in Cascadia
Mega-thrust related
28
III. Quakes and Faults in Cascadia
B. Shallow crustal faults Seattle Fault
33
2001 Spokane Earthquake Sequence: a whole ‘lotta shaking going on!
34
2001 Spokane Earthquakes Summary 3 main “swarm” sequences
June, July & November sequences Considered “unusual” by seismologists Lack of seismic stations=poor data
35
2001 Spokane Earthquakes June Sequence Mainshock = 3.9M (6/25/01)
Total of 21 EQ’s recorded 11 reported “felt” EQ’s (3.4 M, <3.0M) Foreshocks? 5/24-6/24 (2.0M)
38
2001 Spokane Earthquakes Late July Sequence July 28-August 1
14 recorded EQ’s 3.2 maximum magnitude 4 EQ’s on Sept. 28 ( M)
39
2001 Spokane Earthquakes November Sequence
November 11th to January 2002 21 reported EQ’s (19 felt) 4.0M (11/11/01) maximum magnitude
42
Common Characteristics
2001 Spokane Earthquakes Common Characteristics Relatively low magnitudes Explosion-like sounds = shallow depths Clustered “swarms” NW-trending linearity to aftershocks?
45
2001 Spokane Earthquakes What is going on here?
46
Historical Seismicity
Local Seismicity 1915*, 1920, 1922* 1941, 1942, 1948*, 1952* 1961 & 1962 All “low” magnitudes events *Similar locations to 2001
47
Historical Seismicity
Regional Events 1872 Lake Chelan, WA (7.3M) 1936 Milton-Freewater, WA (6.4) 1959 Hebgen Lake, MT (7.5M) 1983 Borah Peak, ID (7.3M) 1987 Othello, WA “swarm” (3.3M)
49
Northwest Regional Geology
Rocky Mountains to east Columbia River Flood Basalt Plateau Cascade Volcanic Range to west Cascadian subduction zone
51
Cascade Subduction Zone
Convergent plate boundary Volcanic mountains Compressional stress = crustal uplift
53
Regional Tectonic Stress Fields
Compressional stress in Cascadia Northward movement of CA-OR blocks S. Columbia Plateau compression E. Columbia Plateau extension & slip?
56
Inland Northwest Faults
Lewis & Clark faults (northern ID-MT) NNW-trending Latah Creek Fault? Other NW-trending structures?
58
Latah Creek Fault Real or not? Robert Derkey, Washington DNR
Definite NNW-trending lineament Intersects with NNW-trend Spokane River Geologically active 8-16 MY ago
62
Other NW-trending structures
63
NW-trending structures
66
Future Seismicity ?
67
Puget Sound - Western Washington
Future Seismicity Cascadia: Puget Sound - Western Washington Subduction continues=compression Nisqually 2001 = NOT THE BIG ONE! Seattle Fault Shallow “giant” subduction EQ’s
69
Future Seismicity Eastern Washington
Yakima Fold Belt = Rattlesnake Hills Spokane & Latah Fault Very little data = ?
70
Spokane Seismicity & Hazards
M4 or less: minor damage potential M4-M6: moderate to significant damage to older & unreinforced masonary structures >M6: severe damage Potential of event magnitudes?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.