Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How do the effects and responses of two contradting earthquakes compare Central Italy 2016, Nepal 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "How do the effects and responses of two contradting earthquakes compare Central Italy 2016, Nepal 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 How do the effects and responses of two contradting earthquakes compare
Central Italy 2016, Nepal 2015

2 AQA say you need to know! Primary and secondary effects of a tectonic hazard. Immediate and long-term responses to a tectonic hazard. Use named examples to show how the effects and responses to a tectonic hazard vary between two areas of contrasting levels of wealth.

3 The effects of an earthquake hazard and responses to a tectonic hazard and how they are different between a developed and less developed country. LICs NEEs HICs?

4 LICs – Low income country NEEs – Newly Emerging Economy
The effects of an earthquake hazard and responses to a tectonic hazard and how they are different between a developed and less developed country. LICs – Low income country NEEs – Newly Emerging Economy HICs – High Income Economy

5 Central Italy (Amatrice) 2016 – A HIC

6 Where did the earthqukae hit
Where did the earthqukae hit? Use the Map beneath to help you write a description of the location of the earthquake. (3 marks) 

7 Give me 5! Write down 5 key facts about Central Italy earthquake’

8 Re-cap Primary effects Secondary effects

9 297 people were killed. More than 1,000 people were displaced by the quake 365 people were being treated in hospital The 13th-century civic towers clock was frozen at 3.39am, three minutes after the tremor struck It levelled houses and buckled roads

10 Re-cap Immediate responses Long term responses

11 Immediate responses The reaction of people as the disaster happens and in the immediate aftermath. Long term responses Later reactions that occur in the weeks, months and years after the event.

12 Outside the ruined towns and their surrounding villages, hastily erected tent cities and kitchens catered for some of the estimated 1,200 people unable to return home because of the risk from aftershocks, with others sleeping in their cars. In response to the disaster, more than 600 restaurants across Italy said they were putting the dish on their menus and would donate €2 from each one sold to the Red Cross The Italian Red Cross is also setting up mobile kitchens for people who have been forced to leave their damaged or destroyed homes.

13 Read through the article
Task 1: Highlight Primary and secondary effects Long and short term responses Task 2: Fill in the example summary worksheet

14 Compare means :- Contrast means :- Evaluate means :-
Use named examples to show how the effects and responses to a tectonic hazard vary between two areas of contrasting levels of wealth. Compare means :- Contrast means :- Evaluate means :-

15 Compare means :- Differences and similarities
Use named examples to show how the effects and responses to a tectonic hazard vary between two areas of contrasting levels of wealth. Compare means :- Differences and similarities Contrast means :- just differences Evaluate means :- weight up and say how effective it is. Complete A3 sheet and complete the exam question

16 Exam technique Contrast the effects of a tectonic hazard in countries of different levels of development. (5 marks) For one country you have studied, describe how they responded to an earthquake (6 marks) For two contrasting areas of the world, evaluate their responses to an earthquake (9 marks)

17 1-2 marks – give basic examples of how they coped (list)
Mark scheme (6) 1-2 marks – give basic examples of how they coped (list) 3-4 marks – give a few examples of what they did (good or bad) 5-6 marks – give good and bad examples of what they did with facts Mark scheme (8) 1-3 marks – only one case study used. Basic examples of how they coped (list). Refers to only good or bad. 4-6 marks – refers to 2 case studies, few examples of what they did (good and bad) but separate accounts. Limited facts. 7-8 marks – Full evaluation (good and bad points) and each one explained as to why it was good or bad. Supported with facts. Comparative statements used.

18 Peer asses and swap answer
Peer review 10 mins write an answer (use previous evaluations) Peer asses and swap answer Highlight / circle good points Underline if not sure Give 2 targets to improve answer using mark scheme


Download ppt "How do the effects and responses of two contradting earthquakes compare Central Italy 2016, Nepal 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google