1. Florida Department of Corrections
Division of Development: Improvement & Readiness

2. Florida Department of Corrections
Our Vision
Inspiring success by transforming one life at a time
Our Mission
Provide a continuum of services to meet the needs of those entrusted to our care, creating a safe and professional environment with the outcome of reduced victimization, safer communities and an emphasis on the premium of life.

3. Florida Department of Corrections
Our Values
Safety
Accountability
Fairness and Integrity
Innovation
Our Goals
Talent Development
Inmate/Offender Programs
Communications
Environment

4. Community Corrections Need
Approximately 60% (over 65,600) of the offenders currently on active supervision have been identified by the Department as having a substance abuse history.
Note: Of the 60% that have been identified by the department as having a need, approximately 22% (over 14,400) currently have a court order or have been referred by their probation officer to substance abuse treatment.
Total Active Offenders on June 30, 2015 = 109,646
Statistics provided by the Bureau of Research & Data Analysis 3/31/16

5. Administrative Percent
Nonsecure Drug Treatment FY Exit Data (*Event-Based) By Facility
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
Bridges of America, Inc.,-The Jacksonville Bridge
71.1%
5.0%
Bridges of America, Inc., -The Orlando Bridge
73.5%
9.5%
Bridges of America, Inc.,- The Polk Bridge – Auburndale
60.3%
2.8%
DACCO - Tampa (DD)
78.1%
1.9%
DACCO - Tampa
54.4%
6.4%
Drug Abuse Foundation-West Palm Beach
54.2%
22.6%
First Step of Sarasota
56.4%
2.1%
Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc. - St. Pete
81.0%
1.3%
*Includes Exit Events within FY for program (with any given offender possibly having several ‘Unsuccessful’ exits per Program per FY)
**Success Rate = Successful Exits/(Successful Exits + Unsuccessful Exits)

6. Administrative Percent
Nonsecure Drug Treatment FY Exit Data (*Event-Based) By Facility (Continued)
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
House of Hope, Inc., dba House of Hope & Stepping-Stones – Ft. Lauderdale (NS)
49.1%
23.9%
House of Hope, Inc., dba House of Hope & Stepping-Stones – Ft. Lauderdale (DD)
71.4%
12.5%
Non-Secure Programs, Inc. – Ocala
53.2%
11.2%
Non-Secure Programs, Inc. – Panama City
52.8%
10.9%
Non-Secure Programs, Inc. – Pensacola
55.2%
16.0%
Non-Secure Programs, Inc. – Tallahassee
53.0%
6.9%
Banyan (formerly Spectrum – Miami)
55.8%
13.0%
Susan B. Anthony Center, Inc. – Lauderhill
81.0%
30.0%
*Includes Exit Events within FY for program (with any given offender possibly having several ‘Unsuccessful’ exits per Program per FY)
**Success Rate = Successful Exits/(Successful Exits + Unsuccessful Exits)

7. Administrative Percent
Nonsecure Drug Treatment FY Exit Data (*Event-Based) By Facility
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
The Salvation Army – Daytona Beach
41.3%
18.4%
The Salvation Army – Ft. Myers
59.6%
6.3%
The Villages South, Inc.
73.1%
0.0%
WestCare Gulf Coast-Florida, Inc. – St. Petersburg
66.2%
8.3%
*Includes Exit Events within FY for program (with any given offender possibly having several ‘Unsuccessful’ exits per Program per FY)
**Success Rate = Successful Exits/(Successful Exits + Unsuccessful Exits)

8. Secure Drug Treatment FY 2014-15 Exit Data (*Event-Based) By Facility
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
First Step of Sarasota, Inc.
56.3% 0%
House of Hope – Ft. Lauderdale
34.9%
30.6%
Phoenix House – Citra
61.9%
13.1%
Banyan (formerly Spectrum Programs, Inc. – Miami)
38.6%
5.0%
WestCare Secure Program
68.1%
15.9%
Note: Percentages are not provided for categories with less than 20 participants because any conclusions drawn from this small of a population may be misleading.
“Successful” means “Completed”
“Unsuccessful” means did not complete for some reason other than "Administrative" exit.
*Includes Exit Events within FY for program (with any given offender possibly having several ‘Unsuccessful’ exits per Program per FY)
**Success Rate = Successful Exits/(Successful Exits + Unsuccessful Exits)

9. Prison Intensive Outpatient Program FY 2014-15 Outcomes/Exit Data (Event-Based*) By Facility
Success Rate**
Administrative Rate
AVON PARK CI
86.9%
29.6%
BAKER CI
23.4%
EVERGLADES CI
98.4%
35.8%
GULF CI - ANNEX
84.9%
41.7%
HERNANDO CI
96.5%
14.9%
LAKE CI
85.4%
41.9%
LAWTEY CI
91.7%
26.6%
LOWELL CI
100%
40.5%
*Includes any exit events within the fiscal year for this program.
**Success Rate = Successful Exits Divided By (Successful Exits +Unsuccessful Exits).

10. Administrative Percent
Prison Intensive Outpatient Program FY Outcomes/Exit Data (Event-Based*) By Facility (Continued)
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
MADISON CI
98.7%
39.2%
MAYO CI ANNEX
91.3%
40.5%
NWFRC MAIN UNIT
97.2%
38.0%
OKEECHOBEE CI
88.3%
38.8%
POLK CI
94.7%
26.2%
SAGO PALM RE-ENTRY
99.3%
41.3%
TAYLOR CI
41.0%
*Includes any exit events within the fiscal year for this program.
**Success Rate = Successful Exits Divided By (Successful Exits +Unsuccessful Exits).

11. ***PROGRAM Non-Completers
In-Prison Intensive Outpatient Program FY (3-Year Follow-Up) Recommitment Data By Level Of Participation
*ALL PROGRAM EXITS
(n=2,905)
**PROGRAM Completers
(n=2,156)
***PROGRAM Non-Completers
(n=749)
Reason for ADMISSION or RETURN
Recommitments
Number
Percent
Admission to Prison, New Offense
576
19.8%
387
17.9%
189
25.2%
Return to Prison, Technical Violation
253
8.7%
191
8.9% 62
8.3%
Admission to Supervision, New Offense
139
4.8%
103 36
Return to Supervision, Technical Violation 3
0.1%
0.0%
Total Recommitments
971
33.4%
684
31.7%
287
38.3%
* ‘ALL PROGRAM EXITS’ = Successful Exits + Unsuccessful Exits + Administrative Exits
** ‘PROGRAM COMPLETERS’ = Successful Exits
*** ‘PROGRAM NON-COMPLETERS’ = Unsuccessful Exits + Administrative Exits

12. Administrative Percent
Residential Therapeutic Community (TC) Services FY Outcomes/Exit Data (Event-Based*) By Facility
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
CENTURY CI
58.0%
22.6%
JEFFERSON CI
54.1%
17.6%
LOWELL ANNEX
69.4%
20.9%
NWFRC ANNEX
56.6%
25.4%
JACKSON CI
59.6%
20.1%
*Includes any exit events within the fiscal year for this program.
**Success Rate = Successful Exits Divided By (Successful Exits +Unsuccessful Exits).

13. Administrative Percent
Residential Therapeutic Community (TC) Services FY Outcomes/Exit Data (Event-Based*) By Facility
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative Percent
MARION CI
50.7%
26.7%
LOWELL WORK CAMP
75.0%
29.8%
FRANKLIN CI
13.2%
27.4%
TOMOKA TC
84.3%
4.3%
JACKSONVILLE BRIDGE TC
72.3%
9.2%
*Includes any exit events within the fiscal year for this program.
**Success Rate = Successful Exits Divided By (Successful Exits +Unsuccessful Exits).

14. FY Substance Abuse Program Center (Continuum Of Services) Program Outcomes/Exit Data (Event-Based*) By Facility
FACILITY
Success Rate**
Administrative
Percent
BRADENTON TRANSITION CENTER (Female)
87.0%
17.3%
SHISA HOUSE EAST (Female)
100.0%
21.4%
HOLLYWOOD WRC (Female)
92.1%
10.6%
ORLANDO TRANSITION CENTER
81.3%
1.8%
POMPANO TRANSITION CENTER
75.9%
16.6%
TRANSITION HOUSE INC.
84.0%
11.2%
REALITY HOUSE
77.1%
2.8%
COLUMBIA ANNEX***
90.2%
31.3%
TOTAL Behind the Fence - FY
74.7%
12.6%
TOTAL Community-based - FY
77.4%
10.5%
*Includes any exit events within the fiscal year for this program.
**Success Rate = Successful Exits Divided By (Successful Exits +Unsuccessful Exits).
***The program at Columbia CI Annex is a “Behind the Fence” model provided to inmates who are recently released from Close Custody and are a more difficult population.

15. Inmates Served in Treatment FY 2014-15
Number/Percentage By Program Type
(40%)
(15%)
(29%)
Total Inmates Served = 12,089
Statistics compiled by the Bureau of Research & Data Analysis

16. Total Offenders Participating in Community-Based Substance Abuse Programs on June 30, 2015
Number/Percentage By Program Type
Total Offenders on Active Supervision = 139,833
Total Offenders Who Had or Were Participating in Community-Based Substance Abuse Programs = 43,270 (30.9%)
Statistics as of June 30, 2015, provided by the Bureau of Research & Data Analysis 4/21/2016

17. Trends
FY 2015/2016
On average, there was an approximate 60% success rate for all non-secure programs statewide
On average, there was an approximate 58% success rate for all long term-secure programs statewide
25% of non-secure participants are between the age of 18-24
Older clients were more successful than younger clients for all program types. Those aged 45 and older were the most successful of all releases from non-secure (79%) Long-term Secure (84%) and outpatient (83%).

18. Trends Continued:
On average, there was an approximate 86% success rate for all in-prison intensive outpatient programs Statewide.
On average, there was an approximate 70% success rate for all In-Prison residential Therapeutic Community programs statewide.
Older inmates were more successful than younger inmates or all program types. Those aged 45 and older were the most successful of all exits from Intensive Outpatient Program (92%) Residential Therapeutic Community (84%).