Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Supported by NSF, DBI to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Supported by NSF, DBI to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G"— Presentation transcript:

1 Future of Field Stations and Marine Labs: Some Context for a Strategic Planning Effort:
Supported by NSF, DBI to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G. Babb, James G. Sanders, Jo-Ann C. Leong. OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

2 Outline NSF – “Level Funding is the New Doubling”
Evolution of National Ocean Priorities National Goals, Broadening Impacts & Innovation

3 NSF Ocean Sciences FY 2012 Request
DIVISION OF OCEAN SCIENCES (OCE) $384,640,000 OCE Funding +$35,720,000 / 10.2% (Dollars in Millions) FY 2010 Enacted/ Annualized FY 2011 CR FY 2012 Request OCE $348.92 $384.64 Research 187.65 207.57 CAREER 2.50 2.80 Centers Funding (total) 4.00 9.00 Coastal Margin Observation & Prediction Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations - 5.00 Education 8.37 8.82 Infrastructure 152.90 168.25 Academic Research Fleet 78.00 69.35 Integrated Ocean Drilling Program 43.40 45.40 Pre-Construction Planning (total) 2.00 Regional Class Research Vessels Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) 16.50 35.70 Two major trends: 1) growth of large cross-directorate programs, 2) growth in infrastructure OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

4 OCE Major Infrastructure Initiatives
R/V Sikuliaq (formerly ARRV) HOV Alvin Upgrade Integrated Ocean Drilling Program JOIDES Resolution near Honolulu, May, 2009 Source: COL website

5 Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI)
Multi-scale ocean observatory in Year 3 of construction $386.42M (NSF is the sole funding agency) 66 months of construction (Sept., 2009 start) $769.5M for construction and initial operations (end 2016) 25 years of planned operations System of systems that will document, for years, air-sea, water column and seafloor processes, across full ocean depths using the best available technologies

6 MREFC & OOI Major Research and Equipment Facilities Construction (MREFC) account Created to fund facilities and instruments separate from research programs Congressional appropriations cut MREFC account far more than overall NSF budget FY 2011 requested level for OOI was $90 million; OOI received $65 million FY2012 total NSF request was $225 million with $103 million for OOI Conferenced at ~$170M, final amount for OOI TBD ~80M?

7

8 Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability (SEES)
Portfolio of activities spanning entire range of scientific domains at NSF To advance science, engineering, and education to inform the societal actions needed for environmental and economic sustainability and sustainable human well-being Support interdisciplinary research and education for global sustainability Build linkages in sustainability research enterprise Develop a workforce trained in interdisciplinary scholarship SEES Opportunities Sustainable Energy Pathways (SEP) (NSF11-590) SEES Fellows (NSF11-575) Sustainability Research Networks (NSF11-574) Partnerships for International Research and Education (PIRE) (NSF11-564) Water, Sustainability and Climate (NSF11-551) Research Coordination Networks (RCN) (NSF11-531) Dimensions of Biodiversity (NSF11-518) Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems (CNH) (NSF10-612) Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction Using Earth System Models (EaSM) (NSF10-554) Climate Change Education (CCE): Climate Change Education Partnership (CCEP) Program (NSF10-542) Ocean Acidification (OA) (NSF12-500) Earth Cube (NSF11-065) Need to think about where FSMLs contribute to sustainability science OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

9 Managing the Tradeoffs NSF Priorities
Unsolicited disciplinary core science (e.g., phys, chem, bio, geo oceanography) Core infrastructure (e.g. ships) Infrastructure for “BIG” science (e.g., IODP, OOI) Targeted research in areas of special national or societal interest (e.g., SEES) Innovation, high risk, high return (e.g., OOI) Human capital/workforce development (fellowships) Education (COSEE) WE NEED A COMPELLING PRODUCT TO COMPETE WITH THESE PRIORITIES!

10 US Commission on Ocean Policy Ocean Research Priorities Plan v 1&2
The Ocean, Coasts and Great Lakes: A Decade of Raising Awareness and Priority Setting Pew Commission US Commission on Ocean Policy Ocean Research Priorities Plan v 1&2 NRC Ocean Infrastructure Report National Ocean Policy OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

11 Pew Ocean Commission Report
Recommendations Governance for Sustainable Seas Restoring America’s Fisheries Preserving Our Coasts Cleaning Coastal Waters Guiding Sustainable Marine Aquaculture OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

12 U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy
Mandated by the Oceans Act of 2000 Over a year-long process Report has 31 Chapters, 6 Appendices and over 200 recommendations Critical Recommended Actions Improved Governance Sound Science for Wise Decisions Education – A Foundation for the Future Specific Management Challenges Implementation – Ocean Policy Trust Fund OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

13 Ocean Research Priorities Plan
Theme 1: Stewardship of Natural and Cultural Ocean Resources Theme 2: Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards Theme 3: Enabling Marine Operations Theme 4: The Ocean’s Role in Climate Theme 5: Improving Ecosystem Health Theme 6: Enhancing Human Health OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

14 Ocean Research Priorities Plan (ORPP) Refresh
Currently SOST is in the process of refreshing these priorities Significant changes: Strongly emphasizes ocean acidification Strongly emphasizes changing conditions in the Arctic Explicitly addresses research in the context of the National Ocean Policy (NOP) Does not have near-term priorities

15 NRC Infrastructure Report
Four Societal Drivers: Enabling Stewardship Of The Environment Protecting Life And Property Promoting Sustainable Economic Vitality Increasing Fundamental Scientific Understanding OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

16 National Ocean Policy

17 National Goals and Broader Impacts
The Competes Act (January, 2011) asks the NSF to apply the Broader Impact review criterion to achieve a number of national, societal goals including: Increased economic competitiveness of the United States. Development of a globally competitive STEM workforce. Increased participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in STEM. Increased partnerships between academia and industry. Improved pre-K–12 STEM education and teacher development. Improved undergraduate STEM education. Increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology. Increased national security. Enhanced infrastructure for research and education, including facilities, instrumentation, networks and partnerships. Education crosscut OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

18 Innovation

19

20 Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future
WHAT ACTIONS SHOULD AMERICA TAKE IN K–12 SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION TO REMAIN PROSPEROUS IN THE 21ST CENTURY? 10,000 Teachers for 10 Million Minds A Quarter of a Million Teachers Inspiring Young Minds Every Day Summer Institutes Science and Mathematics Master’s Programs K–12 Curricular Materials Modeled on World-Class Standards Enlarge the Pipeline Effective Continuing Programs WHAT ACTIONS SHOULD AMERICA TAKE IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH TO REMAIN PROSPEROUS IN THE 21ST CENTURY? Funding for Basic Research Early-Career Researchers Advanced Research Instrumentation and Facilities High-Risk Research Use DARPA as a Model for Energy Research Prizes and Awards OBFS-NAML FSML Workshop

21 “Brain Coral,” by Michael Yiran Ma, graduate student,
Has the time come for a decadal survey approach to setting priorities for future investments in oceanography? “Brain Coral,” by Michael Yiran Ma, graduate student, Duke University


Download ppt "Supported by NSF, DBI to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google