1. International Federation of Air Traffic Safety Electronics Associations PCP and CP2 by Robert Schneebuaer IFATSEA Ambassador

2. Why interesting for ATSEPs
PCP and CP2 are regulations focussing on operational improvements based on technical (r)evolution
The technology which will be needed to fullfill that regulations is bases for our future work within ANSPs
slide nr 2/15

3. SESAR - PCP review and CP2 creation
European ATM Master Plan
Interim Deployment Programme (IDP)
and long-term research for
SESAR 1 + SESAR 2020
SESAR 1 Deployment
SESAR 1 (by SJU)
PCP / „CP1“
ATM-Functionality (AF 1-6)
Sub-AFs DP
Families and Funding Projects
83 Solutions
CP2
ATM-Functionality (building on AF5 and AF6)
Sub-Afs
Families and Funding Projects
SESAR 2020 (by SJU)
SESAR 2020 Deployment
PJ20, future research projects
Deployment Manager (DM)

4. SESAR Solution Cataloge – First Edition
Contains 83 Solutions
Some are mapped to PCP
Some are the bases for CP2
Can be found in the SJU Homepage
slide nr 4/15

5. Example of solutions
slide nr 5/15

6. PCP review 2017

7. Content of the PCP
Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMAs AMAN extended to en-route Airspace, Multiple Airports, Enhanced Terminal Airspace using RNP-Based Operations
Airport Integration and Throughput Functionalities Pre-departure sequencing, Surface Management, Time Based Separation for Final Approach, Airport Safety nets
Flexible Airspace Management incl. Free Route FUA and Free Routing
Network Collaborative Management (Flow & NOP) Enhanced ATFCM, STAM 2, Collaborative NOP
iSWIM functionality Registry, PKI, Technical Infrastructure, Profiles, Aeronautical information exchange, MET, Flight information exchange
Initial Trajectory Information Sharing (i4D) Datalink ADS-C EPP
Key functional improvements addressing critical network performance deficiencies
Building the infrastructure of the future
slide nr 7/15

8. The PCP review was triggered as stated within the IR 716/2014:
According to Article 6 of Regulation (EU) no. 716/2014, a review of the PCP shall be performed by the EC
On 4th April 2017, the EC mandated the SDM to contribute to the review of the PCP

9. PCP Review consultation performed via SDM
6 Months
Main principles
Ensure binding value
Optimise PCP implementation
Driving factors: increased performance and systems harmonisation
Consultation of Stakeholders
Inputs
Assessment of deployment progress in/out FPA
Re-assessment of maturity
Update PCP CBA
Update risks
Stakeholders’ capability
Specific implementation scenario
Outputs
PCP implementation status
Recommendation to adapt PCP
Proposal for incentives
Updated supporting documents:
Standard and regulation roadmaps
CBA
In order to select CP2-Candidates, it is essential that the SJU considers the lessons learnt from the setup, implementation and review of the PCP in close liaison with the SDM and the NM.

10. The EC requested from the SDM the PCP review:
According to the letter of the Commission following has to be delivered by the SDM
A report on the status of the PCP implementation
A recommendation for the potential adaptation of the PCP (Note: the “Where” and the “When” can be discussed)
A proposal for incentives supporting the deployment of the reviewed PCP
An update of the reference and supporting material
An updated CBA
Start of work: 05/2017, Consultation of SCP: 09/2017
Consequences and Tasks for ANSPs
An analyses of the PCP (Monitoring Exercise – see next page) based on the Deployment Programme families have to be performed every year since 2015 by each ANSP
Result: each ANSP has do decide, which ATM Family he cannot fulfil and give inputs by its FAB representative to the SCP of the SDM
For IFATSEA: influence to national representatives, that implementations will be possible in time

11. Monitoring Exercise 2017 Example
As mentioned on last slide, operational Stakeholders have to fill their actual status for all families and send this “2017 Monitoring Exercise”-Sheet to SDM by the deadline of 28 April 2017.
Example

12. SDM Organization – PCP Review
Description of the work organisation by the SDM to achieve the PCP Review

13. PCP Review – Consultation/Time Schedule
PCP review consultation launch: 19. September 2017
PCP review consultation closure: 26. October 2017

14. CP2

15. The Common Project 2 is already “ordered”
The EC has sent a letter to mandate the SJU to develop the CP2
Selecting SESAR 1 Solutions from the MP 2015 Essential Operational Changes and Solutions from the “Safety essentials”
Selecting on basis of the IR criteria:
Maturity
Performance gains to the network (Business case)
Synchronised deployment
Building on PCP and going further, laying the foundation for common infrastructure and therefore building on AF5 and AF6; containing Standardisation & Regulatory needs
CP2 Outlook: - 7 Solutions relating to MP Essentials
- 5 Solutions relating to Safety essentials

16. Setup of the CP2 Creation
European
Commission
SESAR JU
SJU Master Plan Commitee
SESAR 2020
PJ 20

17. Where PSOs have a say
slide nr 17/15

18. Step 1 of CP2 Setup Sequence in detail
SJU selects Sesar 1 Solutions from the MP 2015 Essenital Operational Changes
CP2 Elements are selected and “frozen”.
CP2 preparation phase (Deployment scenarios and BCs, CNS Rationalisation, Standards & Regulation, Optimisation)
Final Draft
of CP2 to EC
Consolidation
today

19. SESAR initial prioritisation

20. The essential role of safety Solutions

21. Where to influence CP2

22. CP 2 Strategy – where can we influence
All employees participating various fora should be synchronised when CP2 topics will be discussed, such as:
IFATSEA and ANSP members in SESAR 2020, A6, SDM, SJU, ICB, CANSO, PSO, ESA, …
Members of National regulator & Ministries by contacting them
Any other fora who will review the CP2
and all underlying groups and task forces

23. CP2 Setup Sequence based on former PCP
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
CP2 2
Step 4
( open consolidation)
= Influenced via IFATSEA or contacts

24. Thank you for your attention!

25. backup!