Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NA3 – User Community Coordination

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NA3 – User Community Coordination"— Presentation transcript:

1 NA3 – User Community Coordination
Steve Brewer Chief Community Officer EGI.eu NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

2 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
NA3 Overview Spain Greece Portugal UK Slovenia Czech Republic France Finland Poland Russia Georgia Armenia Italy Serbia Israel Germany Hungary Netherlands Moldova Norway Switzerland Ireland Turkey Denmark Cyprus Slovakia Albania Sweden Lithuania Taiwan Philippines Indonesia Korea Singapore Malaysia Thailand WP Beneficiary Total PMs WP3-E EGI.eu 201 CSIC 12 GRNET 47 LIP STFC 23 WP3-N ARNES 19 CESNET 28 CNRS 54 CSC 24 27 CYFRONET 34.9 E-ARENA 7 GRENA 6 IIAP NAS RA INFN 40 IPB 16 IUCC 13 KIT-G 66 MTA KFKI 32 NCF 9 RENAM SIGMA SWITCH 8 TCD 14 TUBITAK 36 WP Beneficiary Total PMs WP3-N UCPH 20 UCY 8 UI SAV 38 UPT 24 VR-SNIC 9 VU 15 ASGC 121 ASTI 220 ITB 10 KISTI 28 NUS UPM 12 NECTEC 4 36 Countries 37 Beneficiaries 1379 PMs 28.71 FTEs NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

3 NA3: User Community Coordination
Objectives Activity Achievements and challenges Plans and summary NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

4 1) Objectives: coordinating the user experience
VRCs communicate with EGI through the User Community Board User Community Support team (NA3.2) VRC with many research groups (and one VRC representative) EGI dissemination Research group National and specialist support & services NGI User Support coordination (NA3.3) Support teams available across 50 partners Researchers and scientists Application developers EGI User Community Support Services (NA3.4) The task we were given: To improve the EGI user experience and user services through: Coordination of the management of support service from national and specialist support units Coordination of user-related requirements relating to support services and training Coordination of technical services to support the establishment and management of virtual organisations (VOs) TNA3.1: Activity Management Steve Brewer, EGI.eu, 3% of total NA3 effort TNA3.2: User Community Support Team Steve Brewer, EGI.eu, 30% TNA3.3: NGI User Support Teams 50 partners, Gergely Sipos, EGI.eu, 49% TNA3.4: Technical Services Marios Chatziangelou, GRNET, 18% The UCB is the formal communication channel between VRCs and EGI. Local System administrators Research leader Application Database, Training Marketplace, VO Services, Requirements Tracker Different user types collaborate within a research group NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

5 NA3: User Community Coordination
2) Activity NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

6 Integrate current and future use
Activity Management (NA3.1) User Support Coordination (NA3.2) User Community Support (UCS) team of EGI.eu Ensures the flow of information, knowledge and solutions among stakeholders Support teams NGI User Support Teams (NA3.3) Experts within established user communities Site administrators Projects with focus on specific areas. e.g. EDGI; MAPPER; StratusLab Users Teams Processes Services Processes (NA3.2) User Community Board (UCB) VRC accreditation Requirements processing Training Working Group User Services Advisory Group Technical services (NA3.4) Application Database VO services Training Marketplace Requirements Tracker This slides provides further detail on the Tasks within the Work Package from the end-user’s perspective NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

7 VOs and VRCs within the EGI Ecosystem
User Community A VRC can be a group of large-scale research collaborations, or a number of separate VOs grouped according to research domain A VO is a group of people (e.g. scientists, researchers) with common interests and requirements, who need to work collaboratively and/or share resources Virtual Research Communities communicate with EGI through the User Community Board Requirements + Feedback Services + Support UCB Policies + Funding Service & Resource Providers EGI-InSPIRE Requirements + Feedback Public Funding Bodies Policies + Funding Technology Providers European Commission EGI.eu This slide provides further information about the context of where VOs and VRCs sit within the EGI eco system The UCB comprises representatives of the user communities and met regularly to review and plan user support coordination. Open Source Providers Resource Infrastructure Providers National Research Councils Strategic Feedback Technology + Support Commercial Providers Policies + Funding NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

8 UCB and the Virtual Research Community model: purpose and benefits
UCB: provides channel between VRCs and EGI Benefits: Defined communication channels: named contact points between communities & EGI Application integration Policy and procedures: define interaction between EGI and users Requirements gathering: solutions and influence Dissemination: sharing of news, breakthroughs, best practice and innovation User Community Board comprised representation from: Life Sciences, WLCG, WeNMR, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Earth Sciences, Computational Chemistry, Arts & Humanities, Hydrometeorology NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

9 A virtuous service cycle: current communities
Used by Researchers Gathering New Requirements New Technology Assessed Deployed Infrastructure Services EGI.eu National Resource Providers New User Communities European Grid Infrastructure Ecosystem MoUs & OLAs Technology Providers MoUs & SLAs Current User Communities MoUs Current Use Communities include: Life Sciences, WLCG, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Fusion and Earth Sciences (MoUs proceeding as legal (or project) entities to represent the VRC are confirmed New User Communities include: Arts, Humanities and Linguistics, Hydrometeorology, Seismology, Structural Biology… New requirements are discussed and evaluated during the VRC accreditation process – all part of the negotiation NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

10 NGI User Support Teams (Task NA3.3)
NGI User Support Teams provide: Consultancy & training Access to grid services Application porting Developing and operating software services Collecting feedback Documentation & helpdesk NGIs receive: Web & wiki resources Requirements process Applications and services VRC coordination support NGI User Support Teams Consultancy Training Provide access to grid and software services Porting apps. Dev. and operate software services Collecting Feedback Document Processes & apps. Helpdesk Serbian NGI: Grid Intro March 2011 SIMAP added: 4 March 2011, (Comp. Chem) Support teams are available across 50 partners – they are all different… as are their support skills. NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

11 A virtuous service cycle: new communities
National Resource Providers European Grid Infrastructure Ecosystem Current User Communities Used by Researchers Gathering New Requirements New Technology Assessed Deployed Infrastructure Services MoUs & OLAs MoUs EGI.eu New User Communities include: Arts, Humanities and Linguistics, Hydrometeorology, Seismology, Structural Biology… New requirements are discussed and evaluated during the VRC accreditation process – all part of the negotiation New User Communities MoUs & SLAs Technology Providers NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

12 New user communities: gathering new requirements
Integrated Services Human Technical Infrastructure What makes up a Virtual Research Community? VRCs provide EGI with: EGI offers VRCs: Virtual Organisations Mailing lists Workshops Forums Blogs Projects Shared stories Best practices Collaborations Laboratories Partnerships Requirements Applications and tools Data collections Training modules Success stories Experts Users Easy to use infrastructure Grid-ready applications Training resources Help and support Involvement in open development processes Workshops and forums Design Deliver Discover How do we search for and identify new communities? Service can become sustainable if they are what is needed: - demand creates consensus and participation This is a cyclical process: - user-driven development; community-motivated delivery - keep learning, keep improving efficiency of evolution process NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

13 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

14 Task NA3.4: Technical Services
Provided by a few NGIs for the whole community To support the Virtual Research Communities To facilitate the work of NGI support teams To improve communication among NGIs, among users and with users Tools and services (Task leader: Marios Chatziangelou, GRNET): EGI Application Database (Marios Chatziangelou, GRNET) Domain specific application – for scientific end users Reusable toolkits and services – for NGI support teams Services for VOs (Ignacio Blanquer Espert, CSIC; Gonçalo Borges, LIP) Tools, manuals, assistance for VO setup and management Training Marketplace (Claire Devereux, STFC) Repository of events and materials Place to request and provide NGI training services Requirement Tracker (EGI.eu with help from CESNET) To capture needs from the whole community To offer solutions from NGIs These are taken from the DoW. Training has been revised to better fit purpose. Note that Greece’s effort is equal to Ibergrid and UK combined. NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

15 EGI Application Database
Benefits of AppDB: gives recognition to reusable applications and tools gives recognition to application developers Use of AppDB Register applications/tools Reuse of applications/tools Map of application landscape AppDB gadget has been instantiated by: WeNMR, LSGC, GridPP, Serbian, UK and Hungarian NGIs NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

16 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
AppDB: PY1 statistics New additions to the Applications Database during Project Year 1 (Data: largest to smallest) Note: Apps. Can be associated with > 1 country NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

17 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Training marketplace Integration of: Training event calendar Digital library (of training materials) Service offering & requesting form Purpose of Training Marketplace: Register training events Use, reuse and share training materials Offer training-related services (infrastructure, VO, CA, ...) Feed training-requirements Delegate representative to EGI Training Working Group Results: Approximately 60 training events were added during Project Year 1. Training Marketplace launched: input from Training Working Group new features & legacy data from Digital Library and events calendar now available (~60 training events were added during PY1. NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

18 Training Marketplace: Motivation
The Training Marketplace was devised to overcome the failings of the University of Edinburgh (UE) to deliver the Training Events and Training Repository as part of the UK JRU led by STFC: UE produce no significant new functionality or project plans in PQ1 & 2 In January 2010 UK JRU advised EGI that Edinburgh were withdrawing and that effort would be reallocated within the UK. Training Working Group requirements document ( drives development of Training Marketplace model STFC takes on responsibility of training services in TNA3.4 New technology (Drupal) used importing old training material as required NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

19 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Services for VOs Activities within the sub-task: Consultancy and helpdesk for VO managers Research and evaluation of VO management, monitor and accounting tools: NAGIOS SAM, GANGA, DIANE, CERN dashboard & mini dashboard Specification of requirements for operational tools to simplify VO management Provision of VO support software for VRCs and Vos – in use by: WeNMR, BioMed (LifeSciences), phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu and ict.vo.ibergrid.eu NGI VO monitor NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

20 VO Services: NAGIOS SAM
NAGIOS SAM triggers the executions of probes in grid sites Tests to the Storage resources Tests to the Computing Resources Summary views of successful and unsuccessful services Sends s to the site admins in case of failures Benefits: Sites from a VO are tested (infrastructure tests run probes on NGIs) Ability to develop and integrate VO’s own probes A VO can use the central installation from LIP/UPV, or can install its own Service Status Details for: phys.vo.ibergrid.eu NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

21 Processing EGI requirements; implementing solutions
TCB EGI Requirements Tracker VRCs Input Channels for User requirements NGIs HUCs ESFRIs EEF VOs Developer teams in TNA3.4 UCST (with NGIs) UCB External technology providers EIROs EGI Helpdesk (GGUS system) EMI IGE SAGA, ... 110 18 22 (+ 60) 30 4 20 36 60 requirements captured from documents (have no “owner” from the community yet) Red figures: open requirements Green figures: resolved requirements NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

22 Requirements Tracker (RT)
Permanent storage for EGI requirements User Operational Complete transparency For user communities For NGIs For technology providers Requirement submission interface Query interfaces Manuals available NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

23 PY1 Results: Requirements Tracker
110 new requirements: 48 resolved within EGI-InSPIRE/UCST 36 prioritised by UCB of which… 20 passed via TCB to Technology Providers 26 still being investigated by UCST Current issues endorsed by UCB and recognised by TCB: Increased stability and scalability for gLite WMS Better (more verbose and informative) error messages Fixing the known bugs before adding new features Coherency of command line commands, parameters and APIs Better feedback about jobs, automated resubmission of jobs stuck on sites Requirements to be refined in community workshops Data management, Workflow systems & Workload management Use to define and build EGI VRC User support platform Proved to be an effective communication channel with EMI and other external Technology Providers 60 requirements also generated from legacy documents from VRCs: SHARE Roadmap (HealthGrid), ESFRI project reqs., Production Grid Infrastucture – use Case Collection (OGF), Request for Enhancements of gLite to support bio-NMR applications, gLite requirements collected by the EGEE Project Technical Forum, User requirements (EGI-DS), DRIHMS Questionnaire results (D2.2, D3.2) NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

24 NA3: User Community Coordination
3) Achievements and challenges NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

25 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
PY1: Achievements VRC model developed and deployed: Accreditation process and MoU template created MoUs Signed: Structural Biology (WeNMR) & nearly for Life Sciences (LSGC) MoUs Discussions: WLCG, Hydrometeorology, Fusion, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Comp. Chem. LoI Discussions: Humanities (DARIAH/CLARIN) EGI User Community bodies established: User Community Board established (2 meetings in PY1) Processes established now meeting monthly HUCs and new communities participate; Requirements process developed with TCB User Services Advisory Group (2 meetings in PY1) USAG coordinates technology development teams Contributes to development of Support Service Platform Mention: UCS support team established in Amsterdam AppDB – Applications; tool is framework for developing applications eg – PGRADE, infrastructure services from the community NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

26 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Impact of NA3 NGI contacts established: Communication building with & within partners Dedicated EGI User Support booth at UF UCST related workshops at UF & TF 40-50 attendees Generated new requirements Clarification of existing requirements Dissemination through articles & interviews: iSGTW - NGS Newsletter - NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

27 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Resolved issues Establishing NGI communication channels took a long time Development of the technical services did not run as planned Training Services UE’s withdrawal from UK JRU mean reallocation of work STFC took over responsibility by end of PY1 VO Services SA3 VO dashboard tied to Oracle database (ORACLE). Alternative system implemented using NAGIOS Now used by WeNMR, LSGC and a number of NGIs SA3 now also provided mini-dashboards NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

28 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Unresolved issues Lack of funding for communities to develop VRCs Specialist Support Centres were not funded for HUCs Fewer VRCs were created than envisaged Working to resolve perceived obstacles for new VRCs e.g. Astro using wiki and mailing list Limited contact with ESFRIs Not all in a state to integrate resources with EGI yet Working with ESFRIs through LoI model Adopted by DARIAH and CLARIN Pending establishment of ERICs as legal basis for VRC NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

29 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Use of Resources WP3-E - WP3 (NA3) - NA3 User Community (EGI) Partner Worked PM Funded Committed PM Achieved PM % 1-EGI.EU 39.8 50.3 79% 12A-CSIC 4.6 3.0 152% 29-LIP 99% 16A-GRNET 8.1 8.5 96% 16E-IASA 6.5 3.3 200% 34A-STFC 5.6 5.8 97% Total: 67.5 73.8 92% WP3-N - WP3 (NA3) - NA3 User Community Worked PM Funded Committed PM Achieved PM % Total: 137.9 166.2 83% NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

30 NA3: User Community Coordination
4) Plans and summary NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

31 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Plans for next year: NA3.2 UCB meetings with increased frequency Monthly to generate more interaction with & between VRCs More asynchronous interaction & communication Identify more VRCs Through NGIs and attendance at research community events e.g. Conferences, workshops… Identify and support sub-groups within communities e.g. Seismology, Hydrometeorology… Series of Workshops planned Themes taken from requirements analysis: Aim: Define needs and gaps in order to find sustainable solutions for end-users NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

32 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Plans for next year: NA3.3 Communication: Promote core activities to NGIs by monitoring usage: Application Database Requirement Tracking system Training Marketplace User Support Webpage and the EGI blog The ‘NGI Roadshow’: Help EGI to promote NGIs’ services and to inform NGIs about the tools that exist for them HealthGrid conference in UK is an early prototype, as is, DCI Summer School in Hungary Roadshow model will be presented to NGIs at TF11 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

33 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Plans for next year: NA3.4 Develop and promote integrated User Support Platform: Applications Database (AppDB) Improve quality and reliability of information Improve search & browse capabilities; notifications Architecture; cross-browser compatibility Training Marketplace Map view of data Training wish list; advertise expertise & resources Promotion of teaching modules and courses Integration of legacy data; advanced search VO Services Continue to run existing services Introduce VO Admin dashboard More applications & tools will be added to platform when identified NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011

34 NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011
Summary VRC model implemented User Community Board established User Services Advisory Group established Requirements Tracker established Technical Services: User Support Platform based around gadgets AppDB gadgets: Being used by VRCs and NGIs UE training services reallocated to STFC NA3 – EGI-InSPIRE EC Review 2011


Download ppt "NA3 – User Community Coordination"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google