Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
(GEM) vs Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in progressive/recurrent ovarian cancer
2
Secondary Objective(s):
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine (GEM) vs Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in progressive/recurrent ovarian cancer Primary Objective: Compare TTP in progressive/recurrent ovarian cancer patients failing platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy Secondary Objective(s): Overall Survival (OS) Response Rate (RR) Duration of response Safety/toxicity QoL Sample size: a total of 147 pts is needed (Alpha=0.05, Beta=0.8), in order to detect a difference in the hazard ratio of 58% (median TTP 12 to 19 weeks)
3
Inclusion Criteria Recurrent OC failing platinum/paclitaxel CT and measurable or evaluable lesions No more than one prior CT with a platinum+taxane regimen and treatment-free interval <12 months Age >18 ECOG Performance status < 2 , life expectancy >12 weeks Normal haematological, renal, hepatic, cardiac, respiratory function LVEF >50% Written informed consent
4
Exclusion Criteria Previous or current malignancies at other sites
Brenner’s and borderline ovarian tumors Hb<9gr/dL; ANC<1500/uL; PLT<100000/uL; Creat.>1.5mg/dL or Creat. clear.<50 cc/min; Bil. >1.5mg/dL; AST,ALT>1.5 normal Other investigational cytotoxic drug within 4 weeks before Uncontrolled severe, viral, fungal or parasitic infection Symptomatic CNS metastases Severe medical problems unrelated to malignancy limiting compliance with the study or exposing the patient to extreme risk
5
Study Design GEMCITABINE: 1000 mg/m2 d1,8,15 q28 PLD: 40 mg/m2 d1 q28
(until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity) Evaluation of response: every two cycles (RECIST)
6
Patient Characteristics at Diagnosis
GEM PLD Enrolled 77 76 FIGO stage I-II III IV 3 51 23 4 49 23 Grading 1-2 3 n.a. 15 48 14 12 50 14 Histotype Serous Undifferentiated Clear cell Endometrioid Mucinous Mixed 59 4 6 5 1 2 64 2 4 3 1 Mito 3
7
Patient Characteristics at Recurrence
GEM PLD Recruited 77 76 Age yrs (median,range) 63 ( ) 63 ( ) PFI < 6 months (55.8%) (56.6%) months (44.2%) (43.4%) PS (ECOG) 0/1/ /33/ /39/4 Recurrence (site) Abdominal Lymph node Pelvis Mixed 25 8 36 24 6 12 34 CA125 (IU/ml (range)) ( ) ( ) Mito 3
8
Study Drug Administration Details
GEM PLD Total Cycles administered 269 290 Median No. Cycles/patient (range) 3.0 (1 - 12) 3.5 (1 - 14) Median cumulative dose/patient (mg/mq) (range) 9,000 (1, ,000) 120 ( ) No Cycles with delay 13 (4.5%) 32 (11.8%) No Cycles with reduction 24 (8.3%) 22 (8.2%) Mito 3
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.