Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
ACCORD Eye Study Results
Emily Y. Chew, MD National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD For the ACCORD Study and ACCORD Eye Study Research Groups
2
ACCORD Eye Study Trial Goal
To determine whether: Intensive glycemic control Combination therapy of dyslipidemia with fenofibrate and simvastatin Intensive blood pressure control Affect the progression of diabetic retinopathy in a subset of ACCORD Participants
3
ACCORD Eye Study Design
Baseline and Year 4 comprehensive eye exams including: Visual acuity measurements Fundus photography of 7 standard stereoscopic fields Central grading of the fundus photographs using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Classification of diabetic retinopathy
4
Fundus Photo: 7 stereo fields
5
ACCORD Eye Study Design
Progression of diabetic retinopathy assessed in the ACCORD Eye Study is the primary microvascular endpoint for the ACCORD Study Inclusion: all ACCORD main trial participants are eligible (beginning February 2003) Exclusion: Previous laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or inability to progress 3 steps on the ETDRS Scale of diabetic retinopathy severity.
6
ACCORD Eye Study Design
Primary Outcome is progression of retinopathy: Combined outcome of progression of diabetic retinopathy of at least 3 levels on the ETDRS scale (person scale) assessed on fundus photographs at 4 years compared with baseline; photocoagulation; or vitrectomy during follow-up.
7
Power/Sample Size Power Assumptions
88% power for Glycemia (15% effect) 91% power for Lipid (20% effect) 80% power for Blood pressure (20% effect) Assumptions 38.4% 4-year progression in control group N=3211 with baseline and follow-up Expected 79% retention, target was 4065 10% death 10% refusal at follow-up 1% lack of dilation
8
Recruitment and Retention
3537 at baseline (87.0% of goal) 65 had laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy prior to baseline 3472 recruited and eligible for study 113 (3.3%) died prior to follow-up window opening 503 (14.5%) missed visits or technical problems 2856 (82.3%) had both baseline and follow-up visits
9
Participant Demographics
Variable ACCORD Eye with Follow-up ACCORD Eye without Follow-up Rest of ACCORD Main Trial N 2856 616 5605 Age (yr) 61.6 (6.3) 62.7 (7.1) 62.3 (6.9) Diabetes Duration (yr) 10.0 (7.1) 10.3 (7.0) 11.2 (8.1) Female 38.2% 39.5% 38.4% Previous CVD 31.3% 37.0% 37.1% Nonwhite 30.1% 35.4% 37.3%
10
Participant Serum Factors
Variable ACCORD Eye with Follow-up ACCORD Eye without Follow-up Rest of ACCORD Main Trial HbA1c (%) 8.2 (1.0) 8.4 (1.1) HDL (mg/dL) 41.9 (11.3) 41.7 (10.9) 41.8 (11.7) LDL (mg/dL) 100.7 (32.7) 105.3 (35.0) 105.0 (34.3) Triglycerides (mg/dL) 195.1 (162.6) 198.2 (144.2) 189.6 (148.7)
11
Participant Demographics
Variable ACCORD Eye with Follow-up ACCORD Eye without Follow-up Rest of ACCORD Main Trial Systolic BP 134.5 (17.0) 136.4 (17.2) 136.5 (17.1) Diastolic BP 74.9 (10.5) 75.3 (11.3) 74.7 (10.7) Body Mass Index 32.4 (5.5) 32.7 (5.5) 32.2 (5.5) Visual Acuity Snellen visual acuity 75.9 (10.2) (20/25) 73.7 (10.9) (20/30) 72.8 (12.7) Smoking Never 41.6% 36.9% 42.0% Former 44.8% 47.9% 43.4% Current 13.6% 15.3% 14.6%
12
Proportions Missing 616 Missing follow-up from 3472 with Baseline Visits Blood Pressure Trial Lipid Trial Glycemia Intensive Standard Fenofibrate + Statin Placebo + Statin TOTALS 19% 14% 18% 17% 16%
13
ACCORD Eye Study Results
253 (8.9%) participants had progression: 3 level worsening of diabetic retinopathy on the ETDRS scale (using the Person Scale) Laser photocoagulation Vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy
14
Proportion of Participants with Diabetic Retinopathy Progression at 4 years
Blood Pressure Lipid N=2856 Total Glycemia Intensive Standard Fenofibrate & Simvastatin Placebo TOTALS 9.2% (29/315) 8.1% (25/308) 5.3% (21/400) 7.1% (29/406) 7.5% (104/1429) 11.4% (38/332) 9.4% (29/308) 7.6% (31/406) 13.4% (51/381) 10.4% (149/1427) 10.4% (67/647) 8.8% (54/616) 6.5% (52/806) 10.2% (80/787) 8.9% (253/2856)
15
Primary Analysis Effect Odds Ratio 95% CI P-value Glycemia 0.67
(0.51,0.87) 0.0025
16
Primary Analysis Effect Odds Ratio 95% CI P-value Glycemia 0.67
(0.51,0.87) 0.0025 Lipid 0.60 (0.42,0.86) 0.0056
17
Primary Analysis Effect Odds Ratio 95% CI P-value Glycemia 0.67
(0.51,0.87) 0.0025 Lipid 0.60 (0.42,0.86) 0.0056 BP 1.23 (0.84,1.79) 0.29
18
ACCORD Eye Study Results
Subgroup Analyses NO statistically significant interactions for any of the prespecified subgroups
19
ACCORD Eye Study Conclusions
Intensive glycemia and combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin reduced the proportion whose retinopathy progressed by about one-third Effects were consistent across subgroups No statistically significant effect of intensive blood pressure No subgroup with effect
20
ACCORD Research Groups
Thank YOU!! ACCORD Research Groups & ACCORD Participants
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.