Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 4 Consumer and Firm Behavior: The Work-Leisure Decision and Profit Maximization.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 4 Consumer and Firm Behavior: The Work-Leisure Decision and Profit Maximization."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 4 Consumer and Firm Behavior: The Work-Leisure Decision and Profit Maximization

2 Chapter 4 Topics Behavior of the representative consumer
Behavior of the representative firm Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

3 Features of Model Representative Static Microfoundation
Agents are identical in all respects. The whole economy behaves as if there is only one consumer or one firm. Static Last one period, no saving decision. Dynamic model: last more than one period, need to decide how much to spend today and how much to save for tomorrow. Microfoundation Optimizing consumers and firms Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

4 Representative Consumer
Consumer’s preferences over consumption and leisure as represented by indifference curves. Consumer’s budget constraint. Consumer’s optimization problem: making his or herself as well off as possible given his or her budget constraint. How does the consumer respond to: (i) an increase in non-wage income; (ii) an increase in the market real wage rate? Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

5 Preference Utility function U(C , l)
Representation of preference over C and l. Level of happiness, or utility (C , l) is called a consumption bundle, and the utility function tells how consumers rank different consumption bundles. Strictly preferred: U(C1, l1) >U(C2, l2) Indifferent: U(C1, l1) =_U(C2, l2) Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

6 Assumptions for Preference
More is better than less. Diversity is needed in consumption bundle. C and l are both normal goods. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

7 Representative Consumer’s Indifference Curve
Graphic representation of utility function. Def: connect a set of points, with these points representing consumption bundles, among which consumers are indifferent. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

8 Figure 4.1 Indifference Curves
I-Curve: connects a set of points, with these points representing consumption bundles among which a consumer is indifferent. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

9 Figure 4.2 Properties of Indifference Curves
Downward-sloping (more is better than less) Convex (Diversification is desired) Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

10 Equation 4.1: The consumer’s time endowment
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

11 Equation 4.2: The consumer’s budget constraint
Work and receive real wage in terms of consumption goods. Own production units (firms) and receive real dividend income. Pay lump-sum tax in terms of goods to government. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

12 The Consumer’s Budget Constraint
One period game, spend up all income available. Consumption is equal to total wage income, plus dividend income, minus taxes. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

13 Equation 4.4: Rewriting the Budget Constraint
Trade off between C and l w: relative price of l to C Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

14 Figure 4.3 Representative Consumer’s Budget Constraint (T > π)
At B, can not spend all time on leisure, since need to work to pay tax. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

15 Figure 4.4 Representative Consumer’s Budget Constraint (T < π)
At point B, spend all time on leisure, and still enjoy positive C. Because T< π. That is, use nonwage income to purchase C. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

16 Consumer Optimization
Rationality: representative consumer knows his preference and budget constraint. And he can evaluate which feasible consumption bundle is best for him. Optimal consumption bundle: the point represents a consumption bundle that is On the highest possible IC (largest utility). On or inside the budget Constraint. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

17 Figure 4.5 Consumer Optimization
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

18 Equation 4.6: Holds when the consumer is optimizing
The marginal rate of substitution of leisure for consumption equals the real wage rate at the optimal consumption bundle (the relative price of l to C). Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

19 Real dividends or taxes change for the consumer
Assume that consumption and leisure are both normal goods. An increase in dividends or a decrease in taxes will then cause the consumer to increase consumption and reduce the quantity of labor supplied (increase leisure). Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

20 Figure 4.7 An Increase in π − T for the Consumer.
BC shifts out and parallels to original one since relative price of l to C is unchanged. Both C and l increase. (income effect, normal goods) Labor supply drops, labor income declines. Overall income increases. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

21 An increase in the market real wage rate
This has income and substitution effects. Substitution effect: the price of leisure rises, so the consumer substitutes from leisure to consumption. Income effect: the consumer is effectively more wealthy and, since both goods are normal, consumption increases and leisure increases. Conclusion: Consumption must rise, but leisure may rise or fall. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

22 Figure 4.8 Increase in the Real Wage Rate—Income and Substitution Effects
F→O: substitution effect O→H: income effect Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

23 Figure 4.9 Labor Supply Curve
Ns (w) = h – l (w) Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

24 Figure 4.10 Effect of an Increase in Dividend Income or a Decrease in Taxes
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

25 The Representative Firm
The production function. Profit maximization and labor demand. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

26 Equation 4.9: The Firm’s Production Function
Production function: describe the technological possibilities for converting factor inputs Into outputs. Z: total factor productivity, degree of sophistication of production process. K: amount of capital inputs, fixed in one-period model. Nd: amount of labor inputs, measured as total hours worked. Y: outputs of consumption goods. F: the function that maps inputs into outputs. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

27 Properties of the Firm’s Production Function
Constant returns to scale. Output increases with increases in either the labor input or the capital input. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

28 Figure 4.12 Production Function, Fixing the Quantity of Capital and Varying the Quantity of Labor
MPN: additional output produced by additional one unit of labor input, keeping K unchanged. The marginal product of labor decreases as the labor input increases. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

29 Figure 4.13 Production Function, Fixing the Quantity of Labor and Varying the Quantity of Capital
MPK: additional output produced by additional one unit of capital input, keeping Nd unchanged. The marginal product of capital decreases as the capital input increases. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

30 Figure 4.14 Marginal Product of Labor Schedule for the Representative Firm
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

31 Figure 4.15 Adding Capital Increases the Marginal Product of Labor
The marginal product of labor increases as the quantity of the capital input increases. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

32 Figure 4.16 Total Factor Productivity Increases
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

33 Figure 4.17 Effect of an Increase in Total Factor Productivity on the Marginal Product of Labor
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

34 Equation 4.10: Specific Production Function
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

35 Equation 4.11: Solow Residual
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

36 Figure 4.18 The Solow Residual for the United States
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

37 Profit Maximization A representative firm takes market prices for capital and labor as given, maximizes the profits by choosing the number of labor employed in production. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

38 Equation 4.12: Profit Maximization
When the firm maximizes profits, the marginal product of labor equals the real wage. MPN: marginal benefits from hiring one additional unit of labor. w: marginal costs from hiring one additional unit of labor. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

39 Figure 4.19 Revenue, Variable Costs, and Profit Maximization
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

40 Figure The Marginal Product of Labor Curve Is the Labor Demand Curve of the Profit-Maximizing Firm Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Download ppt "Chapter 4 Consumer and Firm Behavior: The Work-Leisure Decision and Profit Maximization."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google