Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003"— Presentation transcript:

1 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003
1/4 of the horizon CFA Survey 1980

2 The Initial Fluctuations
At Inflation: Gaussian, adiabatic a realization of an ensemble fluctuation field ensembe average ~ volume average Fourier Power Spectrum rms M δ k Pk

3 Scale-Invariant Spectrum (Harrison-Zel’dovich)
mass M t time M

4 Cosmological Scales mass teq zeq~104 t0 time

5  growth when matter is self-gravitating
CDM Power Spectrum mass t time teq  growth when matter is self-gravitating Meq mass CDM Pk kpeak  m h k CDM HDM HDM free streeming

6 Formation of Large-Scale Structure
Fluctuation growth in the linear regime: rms fluctuation at mass scale M: Typical objects forming at t: example M 1 CDM: bottom-up M 1 free streaming HDM: top-down

7 Power Spectrum

8 ΛCDM Power Spectrum normalization:

9 Non-linear Growth of Structure
Lecture Non-linear Growth of Structure Spherical Collapse, Virial Theorem, Zel’dovich Approximation, N-body Simulations

10

11

12 Formation of Large-Scale Structure: comoving

13 היווצרות הגלקסיות המוקדמות מהמארג הקוסמי

14 Formation of Large-Scale Structure: comoving
30 Mpc

15 Filamentary Structure: Zel’dovich Approximation
Approximate the displacement from initial position Velocity & acceleration along displacement → trajectories straight lines In physical coordinates as in linear central force → potential flow Density (Lagrangian): deformation tensor eigenvalues continuity Jacobian → caustics pancake 42% cluster 8% filament 42%

16 Zel’dovich Approximation cont’d
linear → D is the growing mode of GI obeying plug density in Poisson eq. error small in linear regime or pancakes error big in spherical collapse Error: → error is 2nd +3rd terms

17 Non-dissipative Pancakes: why flat?
R oscilation time << expansion time adiabatic invariant pancake becomes flatter in time

18 N-body simulation CDM N-body simulation

19 N-body simulation

20 N-body simulation

21 spherical collapse or mergers
N-body simulation spherical collapse or mergers

22 spherical collapse or mergers
N-body simulation spherical collapse or mergers

23 spherical collapse or mergers
N-body simulation spherical collapse or mergers

24 xxx

25 N-body simulation of Halo Formation

26 N-body simulation of Halo Formation

27 The Friedman Equation Einstein’s equations For the isotropic RW metric
Newton’s gravity: space fixed, external force determining motions Einstein’s equations left side of E’s eq. is the most general function of g and its 1st and 2nd time derivatives that reduces to Newton’s equation Gravity is an intrinsic property of space-time. geometry <-> energy density. Particles move on geodesics (local straight lines) determined by the local curvature. For the isotropic RW metric Stress-energy tensor Einstein’s tensor energy conservation eq. of motion conservation of number of photons mass conservation A differential equation for a(t)

28 Solutions of Friedman eq. (matter era)
radiation era acceleration expansion forever conformal time collapse critical density big bang here & now

29 Light travel in a closed universe
A photon is emitted at the origin (ue=0) right after the big-bang (te=0) photon: conformal time π/ π north pole u south pole 3π/2 π π/2 η big bang big crunch t

30 Top-Hat Model (Λ=0, matter era)
a bound sphere (k=1) in EdS universe (k=0) conformal time tmax tvir universe perturbation overdensity: 5.55 linear perturbation Taylor turnaround linear equivalent to collapse

31 8 universe 200 4 5.55 perturbation tmax tvir t

32 Spherical Collapse universe radius perturbation virial equilibrium
time radius virial equilibrium virial equilibrium: perturbation

33 Virial Scaling Relations
Virial equilibrium: Spherical collapse: Weak dependence on time of formation: Practical formulae:

34 Hierarchical Clustering
Lecture 6 Hierarchical Clustering Press Schechter Formalism

35 Press Schechter Formalism
halo mass function n(M,a) Gaussian random field random spheres of mass M linear-extrapolated δrms at a: a0 =1 a(t) nonlinear σ linear fraction of spheres with δ>δc =1.68: PS ansaz: F is the mass fraction in halos >M (at a) δc x δ derivative of F with respect to M: Mo & White 2002

36 Press Schechter Formalism cont.
self-similar evolution, scaled with M* log M log n(M) M*(a) Example: time Pk approximate Top Hat R x k kR=π in a flat universe

37 Press Schechter cont. Comparison of PS to N-body simulations
Better fit using ellipsoidal collapse (Sheth & Tormen 2002) log M log M2n(M) Comparison of PS to N-body simulations factor 2

38 Press-Schechter in ΛCDM
14 13 12 11 10 9 log M/Mʘ Mo & White 2002

39 Press-Schechter Mo & White 2002

40 Merger Tree t

41 Mass versus Light Distribution
halo mass galaxy stellar mass 40% of baryons


Download ppt "2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google