Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ocean Wave Energy Energy Domain Presentation Nicholas McNeill

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ocean Wave Energy Energy Domain Presentation Nicholas McNeill"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ocean Wave Energy Energy Domain Presentation Nicholas McNeill
28 Feb. 2017 E.E.E.

2 Presentation Overview
Forms of Ocean Energy Wave Energy Overview Wave Energy Converters Benefits and Drawbacks Current Status Moving Forward Key Questions

3 Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
Energy Source: OTEC utilizes the temp. gradient of the ocean in heat exchangers of a Rankine turbine Largest test facility in Hawaii produces 105kW after a $5 million upfront Rather inefficient but is continuous High upfront costs but pretty low running costs Need large temperature delta Could use cold water return to cool building in HI Potential to also desalinate ocean water in the process Estimates 20 cents per kWh 120 houses [1]

4 Ocean Current Energy Energy Source: continuous flow of ocean due to surface winds, water salinity, temperature, ocean floor topography, and the earth’s rotation Similar turbine tech to tidal but far less mature Much more difficult to construct Much more power cables would be needed Harder to determine ecological ramifications A famous 2006 report from United States Department of the Interior estimates that capturing just 1/1,000th of the available energy from the Gulf Stream would supply Florida with 35% of its electrical needs [2]

5 Tidal Energy Energy source: gravitational pull of the moon forms tides
Tidal Barrages Tidal Streams Turbines capture energy from differing water levels Dam is full of turbines Energy collected in both directions Free standing wind turbines anchored to the sea floor Lower upfront costs Less concentrated energy Based on moon-earth Tidal: Benefits: Highly predictable and low running costs Drawbacks: High upfront costs and impacts the habitats of coastal creatures Large plant in Scotland powers over 200,000 homes, plan to increase it to 750,000 homes: uses tidal stream concept [4]

6 Ocean Wave Energy Overview
Unit: kW/m Energy Source: Wind blowing on the ocean surface Latitudinal wind belts—especially Westerlies—are most promising locations Took off after oil crisis of 1973 2/3 of US energy consumption could be supplied via ocean energy Wind Direction [5]

7 Wave Energy Converters
Different WEC’s absorb surge, sway, & heave Components of wave energy tech Structure and prime mover to capture the energy of the wave Foundation and mooring Power take-off system that converts mechanical to electrical energy Control systems for safety and optimization WEC Technologies (>1000 pat) Attenuator Point Absorber Oscillating wave surge converter Oscillating water column Overtopping device Submerged pressure differential [6,7]

8 Attenuators (~14%) Long, multi-segment structures float parallel to the wave direction “Ride” the wave: device motion follows wave motion Relative motion of pontoons convert energy through a hydraulic circuit or mechanical gear train 180 M long, 4M ⌀: 750kW [6,7]

9 Terminators/Overtopping Devices (~33%)
Capture water waves as they enter into a storage reservoir Water passes through a top head turbine and is returned to the ocean Shoreline or floating moored structures overtopping reservoir turbine outlet Large 100M ⌀: 12MW Small operation: 20kW [6,7]

10 Point Absorber (~53%) Floating buoy that rises and falls with each passing wave Movement is used to pump a hydraulic fluid in a column below the surface which is used to rotate the generator First WEC to achieve large scale deployment Height: 41m Diameter: 11m P: 150kW [6,7]

11 Wave Energy Prize 1st place winners AquaHarmonics
18 month public design/ build/test from the DOE Goal: “increase the diversity of organizations involved in Wave Energy Converter (WEC) technology development, while motivating and inspiring existing stakeholders” Point absorber with superior control strategies [8]

12 Pros & Cons Benefits Drawbacks + Clean energy - High upfront cost
+ Renewable + Abundant + Slightly intermittent (90% compared to 30%) but predictable + More energy dense than air/wind + Bulk of population lives near water reducing energy loss + Different WEC available for differing environments and needs + Reduces damages to land + Low operating costs Drawbacks - High upfront cost - Rarely breakages are costly - Low rate of improvement - Only suitable in certain locations - Duck curve - Issues with bad weather - Effects on marine life - Boating concerns - Noise and Aesthetics Wildlife: home & migration hurt due to structure, noise, and magnetic/electric fields, but some grow there [9,10]

13 Current Status of Ocean Energy
Still early stage of development from conceptual up to demonstration stage (tidal is a little further) Best locations and projected energy/upkeep is far along Need more data for environmental issues (empirical) other than carbon LCA Need more data for cost at the commercial scale Need to figure out regulations to streamline mass deployment [11]

14 SI Ocean’s Energy Cost Projections
Costing Approach Cost Breakdown Tidal Energy Cost vs Throughput Wave Energy Cost vs Throughput Used different “Learning curves” to estimate lower costs as a function of deployment For now, the best wave generator technology in place in the United Kingdom is producing energy at an average projected/assessed cost of 7.5 cents kWh, which is more optimistic than these estimates. [12]

15 Regulations & Government Funding
Bulk of regulation is done at the state level but there is overlap Several federal organizations: Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) says its hydroelectric Federal Funding Wave energy prize in 2016 $7.4M from Energy department for MHK Marine and Hydrokinetic Renewable Energy Promotion Act of 2010 was not passed and would have invested $800M reauthorizes the Department of Energy’s Water Power program with a total amount of $800 million for MHK 30% tax credit [13]

16 Why Hasn’t Wave Energy Made a Bigger Splash?
Difficult technical challenges Vast differences in WEC High upfront costs due to installation “Where wind energy was three decades ago” No major players entering the market Difficult to install because areas have lots of wave action… Salt water is difficult on electronic equipment [14,15]

17 Moving Forward/Challenges
Improve and converge WEC designs to drive down costs Get a big player into the game Invest in combined wind and wave farms Secondary energy option after easy wind locations have been saturated

18 Discussion Questions What Wave Energy Converter will become the norm?
How large of an effect would widespread ocean wave energy converters have on the environment? How should ocean energy play into the US/World’s energy portfolio? How should funding reflect this? Is it worth pursuing currently?

19 Works Cited [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]


Download ppt "Ocean Wave Energy Energy Domain Presentation Nicholas McNeill"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google