Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit"— Presentation transcript:

1 Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit
National Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit Key Findings from 2014 Annual Report and Progress Report Hi I am Georgina Chadwick, I am gastroenterology SpR currently doing an OOPE at the RCS working as a research fellow on the NOGCA. I would like to briefly go through some of the new area considered in the 2014 Annual Report which is due to be published at the beginning of November. Georgina Chadwick Clinical Research Fellow

2 High Grade Dysplasia (HGD) of the Oesophagus
465 cases submitted to audit Diagnosed between 1st April 2012 & 31st March 2013. Source of referral 52.9% Symptomatic 39.4% Barrett’s surveillance 7.7% Unknown. 79.4% Diagnosis confirmed by 2nd pathologist. 86.0% cases had treatment planned at MDT.

3 Treatment Plan for HGD Planned treatment
1/3 patients currently managed surveillance alone This goes against BSG recommendations. ‘For HGD and Barrett’s-related adenocarcinoma confined to the mucosa, endoscopic therapy is preferred over oesophagectomy or endoscopic surveillance.’ Fitzgerald RC et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2014;63(1):7-42.  

4 Recommendations for HGD
Confirm all diagnoses of HGD with 2nd pathologist. Discuss all patients with HGD at a specialist MDT for oesophagogastric cancer. This team should include an interventional endoscopist, upper GI cancer surgeon, radiologist and a GI pathologist. Consider all patients with HGD for active treatment. Refer patients to a specialist centre where local expertise is not available.

5 Oesophago-gastric (OG) Cancer
Audit prospectively collected data on: Patients diagnosed with invasive epithelial OG cancer Diagnosed in NHS hospital in England or Wales Aged over 18 at diagnosis. 22,832 cases submitted Patients diagnosed: 1st April 2012 & 31st March 2013 78.6% case ascertainment.

6 Treatment Plan for OG cancer
Proportion treated with curative intent increased to 37.3% vs 2010 Report. For squamous cell cancers - Use of definitive chemoradiotherapy increased (31% to 39%). For early cancers (T0/1,N0,M0) – Increased use of endoscopic resection.

7 Surgery Overall 5,396 surgical records were submitted Curative surgery
95.0% Curative intent 4.3% Palliative intent and 0.7% Unknown. Curative surgery 2,986 Oeosphagectomies 1,807 Gastrectomies Increase in proportion of minimally invasive (MI) operations Oesophagectomies: 41.5% MI or Hybrid Gastrectomies: 15.9% MI.

8 Surgery with adjunct oncology
BSG guidelines Oesophageal cancer - Preoperative chemoradiation improves long- term survival over surgery alone Gastric cancer - Perioperative combination chemotherapy conveys a significant survival benefit and is a standard of care. Proportion of patients with locally advanced disease managed surgically who received additional oncological therapy. Allum W, Blazeby J, Griffin S, Cunningham D, Jankowski J, Wong R. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut. 2011;60(11):

9 Surgical Outcomes Oesophagectomy (%) Gastrectomy (%) 2010 2014 30-Day mortality 3.8 2.4 4.5 2.3 90-Day mortality 5.7 4.4 6.9 Fall in both 30 and 90 day mortality post curative oesophagectomy and gastrectomy.

10 Surgical Outcomes Funnel plots looking at mortality for all Trusts performing curative surgery for OG cancer, demonstrate no significant variation across trusts after adjusting for known confounders.

11 Surgical complications
Reported for English patients only. Oesophagectomy 1 in 3 suffered any complication Most frequently respiratory affecting 17.7% Statistically significant rise in proportion suffering respiratory or gastric complication after oesophagectomy vs 2010 Audit Report.

12 Surgical Complications
Reported for English patients only. Oesophagectomy 1 in 3 suffered any complication Most frequently respiratory affecting 17.7% Statistically significant rise in proportion suffering respiratory or gastric complication after oesophagectomy vs Audit Report Variation in key complication rates by surgical approach. Oesophagectomy Open Hybrid MI Overall Any Complication 34.5% 36.3% 33.9% 33.0% Anastomotic Leak 6.7% 7.1% 11.7%* Respiratory complication 18.1% 20.1% 14.1% 17.1%** * Statistically significant increased risk of leak with MI surgery compared to open. ** Rise since 2010, statistically significant and needs investigation.

13 Surgical Complications
Gastrectomy 1 in 5 suffered any complication Most frequently unplanned return to theatre affecting 8.1% No significant change in complication rates since the Audit Report Variation in key complication rates by surgical approach. Gastrectomy Open MI Overall Any Complication 19.6% 16.5% 19.0% Unplanned return to theatre 7.7% 10.6% 8.1%

14 Resection Margins Aim of surgery is to achieve tumour free resection margins. Proportion of patients who had had an oesophagectomy who had positive longitudinal resection margin has fallen from 6.4% in 2010 to 3.7% in the 2014 Report. BUT 9.1% of patients having a gastrectomy have an incomplete resection. Oesophagectomy Gastrectomy Total n Overall % Positive long. (prox or dist resection margin 98 3.7% 144 9.1% 242 5.7% Positive circ. Margin 685 27.7% 113 10.5% 798 22.5%

15 Definitive Oncology – RTDS Link
For first time radiotherapy dataset linked to NOGCA 90.6% (n=2516) of RTDS Records linked successfully. Radiotherapy treatment regimen, aligned with RCR recommendations for: 59.7% patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer 46.4% patients treated with curative radiotherapy alone. RTDS dataset will allow further exploration of use of radiotherapy in future.

16 OG cancer in elderly 58.9% OG cancers diagnosed in patients aged 70yrs or over. Treatment: Nationally no difference in proportion managed with curative intent according to age, after risk adjustment At local level, there was significant variation in proportion of elderly patients managed with curative intent.

17 Early Cancers Only 5.4% OG cancers diagnosed at early stage (T0/1,N0,M0). Lower oesophageal/GOJ tumours, and oesophageal squamous cell cancers less likely to be diagnosed early. Across strategic clinical networks significant variation in proportion of cancers diagnosed early.

18 Recommendations for OG cancers
Monitor complications rates associated with minimally invasive vs open surgery locally. Monitor quality of surgery Completeness of surgical resection Complication rates and length of stay post-op. Monitor dosing regimens used for definitive radiotherapy for OG cancer. At a local level audit Proportion of patients aged over 70 managed with curative intent Proportion of cancer diagnosed early.


Download ppt "Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google