Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CyberShake Study 2.3 Readiness Review

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CyberShake Study 2.3 Readiness Review"— Presentation transcript:

1 CyberShake Study 2.3 Readiness Review

2 Study 2.3 Overview Compare codes and velocity models
RWG V3.0.3 vs AWP-ODC-SGT CVM-S 4 vs CVM-H 11.9 Different version of CVM-H than previous runs Adds San Bernardino, Santa Maria basins 286 Southern California sites 0.5 Hz Deterministic post-processing only

3 Proposed Study sites

4 SGT Computational Requirements
SGTs on Blue Waters Computational time: 8.4 M SUs RWG: 16k SUs/site x 286 sites = 4.6 M SUs AWP: 13.5k Sus/site x 286 sites = 3.8 M SUs 22.35 M SU allocation, 22 M SUs remaining Storage: TB 160 GB/site x 286 sites = 44.7 TB

5 PP computational requirements
Post-processing on Stampede Computational time: 4000 SUs/site x 286 sites = 1.1 M SUs 4.1 M SU allocation, 3.9 M remaining Storage: 44.7 TB input, 13 TB output 44.7 TB of SGT inputs; will need to rotate out Seismograms: 46 GB/site x 286 sites = 12.8 TB PSA files: 0.8 GB/site x 286 sites = 0.2 TB

6 Long-term storage 44.7 TB SGTs: 13 TB Seismograms, PSA data
To be archived to tape (NCSA? TACC? Somewhere else?) 13 TB Seismograms, PSA data Have been using SCEC storage - scec-04? 5.5 TB workflow logs Can compress after mining for stats CyberShake database 1.4 B entries, 330 GB data (scaling issues?)

7 Verification work 4 sites (WNGC, USC, PAS, SBSM)
RWG V3.0.3, CVM-S RWG V3.0.3, CVM-H AWP, CVM-S AWP, CVM-H Plotted with previously calculated RWG V3 Expect RWG V3 slightly higher than the others

8 WNGC CVM-S CVM-H RWG V Green AWP - Purple RWG V3 - Orange

9 USC CVM-S CVM-H RWG V Green AWP - Purple RWG V3 - Orange

10 PAS CVM-S CVM-H RWG V Green AWP - Purple RWG V3 - Orange

11 SBSM CVM-S CVM-H RWG V Green AWP - Purple RWG V3 - Orange

12 SBSM Velocity Profile

13 Estimated Duration Limiting factors:
Blue Waters queue time Uncertain how many sites in parallel Blue Waters → Stampede transfer 100 MB/sec seems sustainable from tests, but could get much worse 50 sites/day; unlikely to reach Estimated completion by end of June

14 Risks Stampede becomes busier
Post-processing still probably shorter than SGTs CyberShake database unable to handle data Would need to create other DBs, distributed DB, change technologies


Download ppt "CyberShake Study 2.3 Readiness Review"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google