Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Child Welfare Improvement

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Child Welfare Improvement"— Presentation transcript:

1 Child Welfare Improvement
San Joaquin County Child Welfare Improvement

2 San Joaquin County Demographics
Population 673,170 Children in Foster Care (2006) 1749 Children < 5 (2005) 8.0% Children < 18 (2005) 29.7% Caucasian (2005) 73.0% African-American (2005) 7.9% Hispanic or Latino (2005) 34.7% Persons reporting 2+ races (2005) 3.4% Persons below poverty level (2004) 14.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau

3 Child Welfare Improvement
Differential Response Team Decision-Meeting Disproportionality

4 I. Differential Response

5 Differential Response Assessment
Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) with Federal Funding Differential Response Program began in December 2002 Contracted with the Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) Program entitled First Step Resource Response (FSRR) $160,000 (2002/2003)

6 Child Abuse Prevention Council FSRR Sub-Contractors
Women’s Center of San Joaquin County Domestic violence issues with children in the home Council for Spanish Speaking Families with Spanish as their primary language

7 First Step Resource Response Flowchart

8 First Step Resource Response
35 Path 1 cases per week CPS sends the family a letter No confidentiality agreement is necessary when CPS sends referral to DR agencies, They are an extension of the Agency by contract CAPC assess family needs and refer to appropriate agencies for individualized information and resources Family signs confidentiality agreement forms with CAPC or subcontractors

9 FSRR Statistical Data 2002 - 2007
State Fiscal Year Total Referrals Received Total Referrals that Accepted Services Case Returned to CPS by CAPC 12/2002 – 6/2003 355 29 2003 – 2004 1,121 283 2004 – 2005 1,361 37 1 2005 – 2006 1,217 356 5 1,451 822 23 Column Totals: 5,505 1,863

10 Promoting Safe and Stable Families Funding
$ 38,000 from 10/05–12/05 $ 95,000 from 1/06–6/06 $190,000 in 06/07 $190,000 in 07/08

11 Additional Differential Response Services
Family Advocacy Support Team (FAST) Differential Response Case Management Domestic Violence Response Team Differential Response Service Integration

12 Differential Response Flow Chart

13 Women’s Center- Family Advocacy Support Team (FAST)
Began in July 2004 $38,000 per year Path 1: 13 cases per week Path 2 & 3: 12 cases per week Domestic violence advocate out staffed at CPS

14 Differential Response Case Management Program
San Joaquin County received CWSOIP funds $378,418 (06/07) $378,886 (07/08) Provision of case management services for families who voluntarily accept services

15 Collaborating agencies:
Child Abuse Prevention Council Community Partnership for Families Council for Spanish Speaking Women’s Center of San Joaquin County Data Co-op of San Joaquin County

16 Referrals received from:
FSSR Program FAST Program Direct Referrals from CPS Cross-referrals between agencies

17 CBO’s average per year:
120 families 240 children per year Community Partnership for Families Family Success Team (FST) meetings Case management services provide: Weekly contact with family and bi-weekly face-to-face contact Written case plan Manage case for a minimum of three months

18 Differential Response Case Management Subsequent Referral’s to CPS

19 Domestic Violence Response Team
CPS – out-stationed at Stockton Police Department SPD Women’s Center Probation Victim Witness

20 Differential Response Service Integration
San Joaquin County received funding from California Department of Social Services Child Welfare Services Outcome and Improvement Project (CWSOIP) $200,000 05/06

21 Community Partnership for Families was contracted to enhance service delivery system and integrate services: Plan Coordinate Facilitate Train Served as the hub of services for collaborating public and non-profit agencies

22 Differential Response Collaborative Monthly Meetings
Beginning in 2005, Child Welfare Services: Coordinates and facilitates a monthly meeting of the partners Approximately individuals from various agencies attend Focus on problem-solving strategies Share resource information

23 Arrange for CBO case managers to shadow CPS social workers
Share outcome data Arrange for CBO case managers to shadow CPS social workers Funding updates Case management software discussion CPS sponsored training and CBO cross-training CPS supervisor liaison: Assist in case management issues

24 Differential Response Case Management Software Program
$50,000 in 05/06 in CWSOIP funds Development and implementation of a software program for the CBO’s providing differential response Utilized for case documentation, case management and outcome report information $10,000 for 07/08 for software program support services

25 II. Team Decision Meetings (TDM)

26 Team Decision Meetings
CPS Emergency Response Family Reunification Families on Course Unite Successfully (FOCUS)

27 CPS Emergency Response TDM’s
Began on July 1, 06 One TDM Coordinator Intake & Assessment Units Low to moderate risk cases Team strategies how to best help family/child Connect with community-based organizations Prevent detention, if possible and safe Court Units Placement Issues

28 TDM and Case Management for Family Reunification Cases
Goal:To reduce the rate of re-entry into foster care PSSF funding provided for TDM’s and post-reunification case management services: 05/06 $60,000 (six months) 06/07 $114,000 07/08 $114,000

29 Awarded a contract to the Center for Positive Prevention Alternatives (CPPA)
Families on Course Unite Successfully (FOCUS) Referrals come through the Family Social Work Program of CWS when families appear close to reunification Since October ’06, TDM’s have averaged nine cases per month (initial and follow-up TDM’s)

30 How FOCUS TDM’s Work CWS referred to FOCUS families who are within two to three months of reunification FOCUS coordinates and facilitates TDM TDM held at Community Partnership for Families, Family Resource Centers, if possible Goal of TDM: Address case plan process Develop a safety net for family

31 Post Reunification Services
Provide services for a minimum of three months or until the family appears to be stabilized In addition to Family Social Worker, FOCUS provides case management services Weekly contact and a minimum of one face-to-face visit per month Goal is to serve up to 120 families per year

32 Community Resources Available Through FOCUS Program
Center for Positive Prevention Alternatives Individual & family therapy Anger management classes Youth decision group Art-based therapy group Parent support group Council for Spanish Speaking Case Management issues Services for Spanish speaking people

33 Community Partnership for Families - Family Resource Centers
Housing Financial planning School related issues Child care Family safety Case management services Child Abuse Prevention Council Crisis nursery services Structured child care

34 Women’s Center of San Joaquin County
Domestic violence counseling/support groups Domestic violence shelter Sexual assault counseling Case management services

35 III. Disproportionality

36 Over-Representation of African-American Children in the CWS
Disproportionate amount of African-American children in the Child Welfare System Federal State County 2005/2006 San Joaquin County convened a workgroup to determine how to approach this issue. Group consisting of: Line Staff Supervisors Administrators Facilitator

37 Disproportionality in Referrals
Notes: Highlight the data, and explain that this is reflective of statewide and national data also (refer them to the complementary data summarized in a handout) – Identify issue with missing data. Percentages based upon 4313 referrals that had identified ethnicity attached. Significant Sample Punch the point - referrals Additional Points: Disproportionality exists for African American children in San Joaquin County at several points in the child welfare process, including first entries, longer stays in foster care, being more likely to be in long-term care, and less likely to be reunified Source: University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research

38 Disproportionality in Foster Care
Notes: Highlight the data, and explain that this is reflective of statewide and national data also (refer them to the complementary data summarized in a handout) (African American children are represented in foster care at nearly 3 times their representation in the population in the county) Based upon total number of 1732 children in care and 195,328 children in population Additional Points: In California – African American children represent 7.22% of population and 28.99% of children in care (as of July 1, 2005) Nationally – Based on census data, African American children represent 15.10% of the population and 36.6% of the children in care [African American and Native American children are the most disproportionately represented children in foster care—African American children are 4 times more likely and Native American children are 3.5 times more likely than White children to be in foster care – Child Welfare League of America – National Data Analysis Data] In addition, research indicates that children of color are Not at greater risk for abuse and neglect than White children and there are no differences in incidence of maltreatment (Child Welfare League of America – National Data Analysis System)…However, disproportionality exists. Source: University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research

39 05/06 Disproportionality Workgroup Activities
Organize the “Closing the Gap” Conference Developed CWS specific training approach on the issue of bias Regular meetings to move disproportionality efforts forward

40 “Closing the Gap” Conference
April 19, 2006 Approximately 300 participants Social workers Community-based agency representatives Community members Presenters: Antwone Fisher Dr. Rita Cameron Wedding

41 Presentation on County child welfare data
Community input on the issue of disproportionality Models from other counties Facilitated group discussions Communicating about cultural issues Improving work place practice Societal issues

42 Recommendations from Conference
Increase cultural competency training for CWS staff Bring families, community, public & private agencies together to identify best practice Increase prevention & intervention services for families Increase educational opportunities for parents Invest resources to support reunification and/or kin placements Hire more African-American’s in all positions CWS CBO’s

43 Disproportionality Activities 2006 - 2007
“One worker One solution at a Time” trainings for all administration, supervisory, and line staff as provided by Dr. Rita Cameron-Wedding System Partner Conferences “Understanding CPS” presentation Two community forums Approximately 130 participants

44 Disproportionality Activities 2007 - 2008
2008 Children’s Services Coordinating Committee - Annual Child Abuse Workshop Presentation Peer-to-Peer disproportionality training for administrators and supervisors Identify additional staff trainings for practice strategies around disproportionality Development of cultural considerations policy Mobilization of community engagement activities


Download ppt "Child Welfare Improvement"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google