1. Continuous Program Improvement
Review of Program Educational Objectives and Student Outcomes

2. Student Outcomes – “Big Loop”
(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. And “Process Safety”

3. Past Outcomes Assessment - Red denotes outcomes which are insufficiently assessed
ChNE/ChBE Course →
Outcome ↓
251
253
302
311
312
317
318
319
321
361
418
419
451
461
493
494
(a) Apply math, science and engineering X
(b) Design and conduct experiments, analyze data
(c) Design a system, component, or process under constraints such as economic, environmental, health and safety, etc.
(d) Work in multidisciplinary teams
(e) Solve engineering problems
(f) Understand professional and ethical responsibility
(g) Communicate effectively
(h) Understand the impact of engineering in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context
(i) Life-long learning
(j) Knowledge of contemporary issues
(k) Use techniques, skills, and tools for engineering practice
Additional: Hazards in Chemical Processes

4. Current Outcomes Assessment as of Fall 2015 – Spring 2016 Version 3 by S.M. Han
ChNE/ChBE Course →
Outcome ↓
251 Gomez Fall
253 Datye Spring
302 Petsev Spring
311 SM Han Fall
312 Busch Spring
317 SE Han Fall
318L Gomez Fall
319L Gomez Spring
321 Chi Spring
361 Shreve, Graves Fall
371 Apblett, Garzon Spring
418L Ward, Chi Fall
419L Datye Spring
451 Canavan Fall
454 Edwards Spring
461 Dirk Fall
493L Gomez Fall
494L Gomez Spring
(a) Apply math, science and engineering X  X
(b) Design and conduct experiments, analyze data X 
(c) Design a system, component, or process under constraints such as economic, environmental, health and safety, etc.
(d) Work in multidisciplinary teams
(e) Solve engineering problems
(f) Understand professional and ethical responsibility
(g) Communicate effectively
(h) Understand the impact of engineering in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context
(i) Life-long learning
(j) Knowledge of contemporary issues
(k) Use techniques, skills, and tools for engineering practice
Additional: Hazards in Chemical Processes

5. Outcomes Assessed in CBE 321 Mass Transfer
(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering
(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility
…and Process Safety through a case study of jet fuel leak on the Air Force Base and SACHE certificate

6. Student Outcome (a)

7. Outcome (a) Performance Criterion 4
PC4: ChNE 321 Spring 2014
Item 1: Midterm 1 score, which evaluated the conceptual understanding and engineering problem solving skills for diffusive mass transfer. 70 % out of 100 % was used as the absolute bar above which students were considered to meet expectations, and 90 % was used as the absolute bar above which students were considered to have exceeded expectations.
Item 2: Final exam score, which evaluated conceptual understanding and engineering problem solving skills for diffusive and convective mass transfer, as well as multi-stage separation processes. 50 % out of 100 % was used as the absolute bar above which students were considered to meet expectations, and 80 % was used as the absolute bar above which students were considered to have exceeded expectations.
PC4: ChNE 321 Spring 2015
Item 2: Final exam score, which evaluated conceptual understanding and engineering problem solving skills for diffusive and convective mass transfer, as well as multi-stage separation processes. 70% out of 100 % was used as the absolute bar above which students were considered to meet expectations, and 90% was used as the absolute bar above which students were considered to have exceeded expectations.

8. Outcome (f)
Industrial Safety and Remediation Case Study: Jet Fuel Leak on the Air Force Base

9. Outcome (f)

10. Process Safety by SACHE Training