1. Motions for 2006/11 Date: 2006-11-16 Authors: November 2006 Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
November 2006
Motions for 2006/11
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair
John Doe, Some Company

2. Abstract Motions for 2006/11 November 2006 Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
November 2006
Abstract
Motions for 2006/11
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair
John Doe, Some Company

3. Rescind 11-06-1147 (accept 11-06-1636). 2 yes, 5 no
November 2006
Straw Poll: Which of the following alternatives for comment resolution of comment 897 are acceptable (yes/no for each):
ANonce solution present in the comment resolution of 897 in the spreadsheet. 2 yes, 4 no
Rescind (accept ). 2 yes, 5 no
A new R0 Nonce (accept ). 5 yes, 4 no
Define the key lifetime = 0 to mean never expires (needs submission). 10 yes, 1 no
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

4. Straw Poll: Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - . November 2006
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

5. Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 1. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the comment resolutions in r-d3-comments.xls in Groups #1 through Groups #4, with the exceptions of comments 499, 279, and 1969.
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Bob Miller
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

6. Result: Yes - 23; No - 9; Abstain - 10. Fails
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-lb87-cid-1011-et-al.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 23; No - 9; Abstain - 10.
Fails
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

7. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 9; No - 13; Abstain - 13.
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-key-distribution-push-capability.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and the comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 9; No - 13; Abstain - 13.
Fails
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

8. Result: Yes - 10; No - 10; Abstain - 16. Fails
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-key-distribution-comments.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and the comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Bob Miller
Result: Yes - 10; No - 10; Abstain - 16.
Fails
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

9. Result: Yes - 26; No - 0; Abstain - 5. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-text-corrections.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft.
By: Dorothy Stanley
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 26; No - 0; Abstain - 5.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

10. By: Michael Montemurro Second: Rajneesh Kumar
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-mdie-policy-bit-definitions.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and the comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Michael Montemurro
Second: Rajneesh Kumar
Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain - 6.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

11. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 15; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in r-key-lifetime-psk.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and the comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 15; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

12. Result: Yes - 6; No - 4; Abstain - 10. Fails
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in r-cid-1835-general-encapsulation.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and the comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 6; No - 4; Abstain - 10.
Fails
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

13. Result: Yes - 7; No - 9; Abstain - 6. Fails
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comment #1529 as “Accepted”, #1530 (and all others with that proposed resolution) as “Accepted. 8A.6 moved to informative annex”, and instruct the editor to make the changes to the draft.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: David Hunter
Result: Yes - 7; No - 9; Abstain - 6.
Fails
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

14. Result: Yes - 5; No - 12; Abstain - 4. Fails
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comment #1529 as “Counter. 8A.6 deleted”, #1530 (and all others with that proposed resolution) as “Accepted. 8A.6 deleted”, and instruct the editor to make the changes to the draft.
By: Kiwin Palm
Second: David Hunter
Result: Yes - 5; No - 12; Abstain - 4.
Fails
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

15. Result: Yes - 8; No - 2; Abstain – 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-lb87-cid-1011-et-al.doc, with the changes given in slide #14 of r-pmk-r1-key-distribution-security-analysis.ppt and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 8; No - 2; Abstain – 2.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

16. Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain – 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-vegomatic-8-5a-6-d2-2.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain – 2.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

17. Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain – 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-vegomatic-8-5a-6-d2-2.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft and comment resolution spreadsheet.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain – 2.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

18. By: Michael Montemurro Second: Harry Worstell Withdrawn
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-security-assumptions.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft.
By: Michael Montemurro
Second: Harry Worstell
Withdrawn
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

19. Second: Henry Ptasinski Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Move to instruct the editor to apply the proposed changes from 11-06/1769r1 to the r draft and to accept the comment 1619 in LB87 with the resolution of “Accepted. Addressed with the acceptance of 11-06/1769r1.”
By: Jouni Malinen
Second: Henry Ptasinski
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

20. MOTION: Motion to resolve comment #499 as “Accept” By: Bill Marshall
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comment #499 as “Accept”
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Rajneesh Kumar
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

21. Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 1. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comment #520 as “Counter. Changed to “Resource Request Protocol Supported””
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Frank Ciotti
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

22. Second: Donald Eastlake Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 3. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comment 22 as “Counter. Changed to “AES-128-CMAC””
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Donald Eastlake
Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 3.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

23. Second: Rajneesh Kumar Result: Yes - 7; No - 0; Abstain - 5. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the proposed resolutions for comments 279 and 1969 in the comment resolution spreadsheet r-d3-comments.xls.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Rajneesh Kumar
Result: Yes - 7; No - 0; Abstain - 5.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

24. Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 3. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comments 1529 and 1530 as “Rejected. State machines are intended to be accurate and specify behaviors that are applicable to all implementations. Comments are invited to help reach that goal.”
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 3.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

25. By: Michael Montemurro Second: Rajneesh Kumar
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comments 1835 and 1860 as “Rejected. General encapsulation schemes are overly complex for the function needed in IEEE r”
By: Michael Montemurro
Second: Rajneesh Kumar
Result: Yes - 6; No - 0; Abstain - 4.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

26. Result: Yes - 7; No - 0; Abstain - 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to resolve comment 10 as “Rejected. The comment does not provide any concrete reasons for why the existing protocol is considered complex and why the commenter feels that it violates the PAR.”
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 7; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Passes
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

27. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the submission contained in document r-d3-minor-corrections.ppt, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

28. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 0.
November 2006
MOTION: Accept the highlighted portions in yellow contained in document r-mdie-policy-bit-definitions.doc, and instruct the editor to incorporate the changes into the draft.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 0.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

29. Second: Rajneesh Kumar Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 1. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Instruct the editor to delete from the draft the embossed portion in slide 14 in document r-pmk-r1-key-distribution-security-analysis.ppt,.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Rajneesh Kumar
Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

30. Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Move to instruct the editor to apply the proposed changes (option #2) from 11-06/1805r0 to the r draft and to accept the comment 20 in LB87 with the resolution of “Accepted. Addressed with the acceptance option #2 of 11-06/1805r0”.
By: Jouni Malinen
Second: Frank Ciotti
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

31. Second: Henry Ptasinski Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 0. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Move to resolve comment #1240 as “Accepted. Text changes in r-d3-minor-corrections.ppt”
By: Kapil Sood
Second: Henry Ptasinski
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 0.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

32. Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Hold weekly IEEE TGr teleconferences at 11:00 ET starting December 6th, 2006 and continuing through the end of March 2007, for a duration of two hours on December 20th, 2006 and January 10th, 2007, and one hour on the other dates.
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Bill Marshall
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Passes
Scheduled for Thursday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

33. Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain - 3. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Hold a IEEE TGr ad-hoc meeting February 21th through February 23nd, 2007.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain - 3.
Passes
Scheduled for Thursday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

34. Result: Yes - 13; No - 1; Abstain - 6. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Move to resolve comment #725 as “Rejected. In most applications of TGr the Mobility Domain is expected to include numerous BSSs and the additional 802.1X authentications when moving to a new Mobility Domain is acceptable”
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Pat Calhoun
Result: Yes - 13; No - 1; Abstain - 6.
Passes
Tuesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

35. Result: Yes - 16; No - 1; Abstain - 1. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: Motion to request technical editor to create an updated IEEE r draft 3.1.
By: Dorothy Stanley
Second: Bill Marshall
Result: Yes - 16; No - 1; Abstain - 1.
Passes
Wednesday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

36. Result: Yes - 15; No - 1; Abstain - 3. Passes
November 2006
MOTION: To accept r-d3-comments.xls as the comment resolutions of LB87 comments
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Bob Miller
Result: Yes - 15; No - 1; Abstain - 3.
Passes
Thursday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

37. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
November 2006
MOTION: Move to request the IEEE Working Group Chair to allow the draft of IEEE r to be distributed to selected security experts for the purposes of an external security review of the draft.
By:
Second:
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

38. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
November 2006
MOTION:
By:
Second:
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

39. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
November 2006
MOTION: Moved: Instruct the technical editor to rename r draft 3.1 as r draft 4.0. Having addressed all comments arising from LB87, Task Group r resolves to forward r draft 4.0 to the working group for the purpose of conducting a 15-day working group recirculation letter ballot.  The purpose of the working group recirculation letter ballot is to forward the draft to sponsor ballot. –The text of the motion to be presented to the working group will be “Move to authorize a 15-day Working Group Recirculation Letter Ballot of r draft 4.0, asking the question “Should the r draft 4.0 be forwarded to sponsor ballot?””
By:
Second:
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Thursday
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

40. November 2006
References
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair