Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySandra Bruce Modified over 7 years ago
1
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1
2
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
Design Randomisation* 2 : 1 Open-label W48 306 HIV+ ≥ 18 years ARV with PI+r + ≥ 2 NRTIs or NNRTI + ≥ 2 NRTIs (exclusion of patients on TDF + FTC + EFV) No history of prior virologic failure HIV-1 RNA < 200 c/mL > 3 months Creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min N = 97 Continue Stable Baseline Regimen (SBR) N = 203 Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV qd fdc (single tablet) fdc = fixed drug combination * Randomisation stratified on the use of PI or NNRTI (53% patients on PI, 47% on NNRTI) Objective Non inferiority in the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (Intent-to-treat analysis, non completer = failure, TLOVR algorithm) ; lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference = -15%, 80% power AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
3
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
ARV-trial.com AI Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV Baseline characteristics and patient disposition Continuation of SBR N = 97 TDF/FTC/EFV N = 203 Median age, years 43 Female 14% 11% HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL 98% 96% CD4 cell count, median/mm3 515 517 Duration of current ARV regimen, median years 3.1 2.6 Current ARV therapy as first regimen 88% Hepatitis B or C coinfection 1% 7% Background NRTI at enrolment: TDF/ZDV/ABC 40% / 32% / 23% 37% / 42% / 23% Discontinuation before W48, n (%) 12 (12%) 22 (11%) For adverse event 1 10 For virologic failure AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
4
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
ARV-trial.com AI Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV Outcome at Week 48 Virologic response (ITT, NC = F, TLOVR) for the whole population and by prior treatment stratum SBR TDF/FTC/EFV 88 89 HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL % 20 40 60 80 100 95% CI for the difference = -5.9 ; 11.1 < 200 c/mL 95% CI for the difference = -6.7 ; 8.8 85 87 95% CI for the difference = -3.1 ; 21.8 95% CI for the difference = ; 8.4 Prior NNRTI Prior PI 82 92 83 N= 97 203 45 95 52 108 AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
5
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
Other endpoints Virologic failure SBR, N = 1 (1.03%) TDF/FTC/EFV, N = 3 (1.48%) No significant changes in CD4 cell counts within or between treatment arms Nervous System and Psychiatric Symptoms Nervous System Symptoms = SBR: 13% vs TDF/FTC/EFV: 22% Psychiatric Symptoms = SBR: 8% vs TDF/FTC/EFV: 28% Study drug discontinuation, N = 5, all in TDF/FTC/EFV group (prior PI stratum) Renal Adverse events Discontinuation for increase in creatinine, N = 1, on TDF/FTC/EFV Grade 1 treatment-emergent creatinine elevations = SBR: 3% vs TDF/FTC/EFV: 2%. No Grade ≥ 2 elevation of creatinine AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
6
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
Changes in glomerular filtration rate* (mL/min/1.73 m2) TDF/FTC/EFV SBR 203 97 200 182 188 181 95 89 92 87 196 129 58 127 120 121 57 51 54 50 125 20 40 60 80 100 4 12 24 36 48 Study week * Evaluated by the MDRD equation AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
7
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
Fasting lipid changes Overall, no significant differences were seen between treatment arms for fasting total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol No change in HDL cholesterol overall or in the prior NNRTI stratum Significant increase in HDL cholesterol in the TDF/FTC/EFV group vs SBR group for patients in the prior PI regimen For triglycerides, decrease of levels were significantly higher in the TDF/FTC/EFV group and was greatest in the prior PI stratum Patients’ questionnaires Preference of TDF/FTC/EFV over the previous regimen TDF/FTC/EFV regimen considered easier than SBR (p < 0.001) Patients in the TDF/FTC/EFV group had more symptoms of dizziness or light-headedness compared with the SBR, at W4 (p = 0.018) Improvement in diarrhoea and loose bowel movements in the TDF/FTC/EFV group for patients with prior PI-based regimen (p = 0.002) AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
8
AI266073 Study: Switch PI or NNRTI to TDF/FTC/EFV
Conclusions Patients with stable ARV treatment and virologically suppressed on NNRTI- or PI-based therapy maintained high rates of virological suppression after simplification to a single-tablet regimen of TDF/FTC/EFV TDF/FTC/EFV was virologically non inferior to maintenance of prior suppressive ARV regimen Patients on prior PI-based therapy were more likely to experience transient nervous system and psychiatric symptoms ; for 2% of patients, these adverse events were treatment-limiting AI266073 DeJesus E, JAIDS 2009;51:163-74
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.