1. Teaching Innovation Conference Arkansas Tech University May 5, 2016
Exploring Free Technology Tools to Flip Classroom in the Light of TPACK Framework
Aileen Watts
Arkansas Tech University
Mohamed Ibrahim
Arkansas Tech University
Teaching Innovation Conference Arkansas Tech University May 5, 2016

2. Framework Flipped Classroom Dynamics TPACK
Tools for Classroom Dynamics
Applications

3. Flipped classroom
Lecture-based Teaching:
Mostly static
Passive

5. TPACK

6. Tools to “Flip” your instruction

7. Tools to “Flip” your instruction
Google Video Notes

8. Google Video Notes

9. Google Video Notes

11. Google Video Notes

13. Padlet Online collaboration Common Core Word Work (Phonics) Lessons
Digital Literacy Options
Online collaboration

14. Other Student Work Examples
Online collaboration

15. Tools to “Flip” your instruction
Students’ Examples:
Live Broadcast

16. Wikis (PBWorks and Wikispaces)
Service Learning Projects
School Resources
Final Class Projects
Online collaboration

17. Edmodo
Social Networking

18. Voicethread Teacher Interviews
Class Discussions
Student Responses

19. Other Student Examples
VoiceThread
Other Student Examples

20. Vocaroo Online Podcast http://vocaroo.com/
Online Podcast

21. Quizlet and Related Digital Assessments
Quizzes, flashcards, practice, etc. (Smartboard)
Tablets, Computers, Cell Phones
Kahoot
Socrative
Metimeter

22. Other Student Work Examples
Digital Flashcards

23. Tools to “Flip” your instruction
Interactive Video Learning

24. Educreations Chapter Discussion Questions Teaching Philosophy
Teaching Philosophy

25. Other Student Work Samples
Online White Board

26. Blackboard Ultra

27. Tools to “Flip” your instruction
Voting
Quizzes
Online Google Forms

28. Google Hangout

29. Blogger and Blogspot Webquests School Visit Reflections
School Visit Reflections
UDL Lesson Plans
Exceptionalities Projects

30. Tools to “Flip” your instruction
Online Animation

31. Free Websites E-Folio - Google Sites Summative Projects - Protopage
Summative Projects - Protopage
Professional - Wix

32. Tools to “Flip” your instruction
Screen capture

33. Content Creation Professional Content Teacher-created Screencasts
YouTube, Khan Academy, TedTalks, TedEd
Teacher-created Screencasts
Camtasia
Screencast-o-matic (Free!)
Teacher-created Video
Webcam
IPhone or I Pad

34. Tools to “Flip” your instruction

35. Effects of the Flipped Classroom
OBJECTIVES: To investigate:
The implications of the use of flipped classroom teaching strategy on:
Preservice teachers’ learning outcomes
Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy
Preservice teachers’ perception

36. PARTICIPANTS 60 preservice teachers (39 undergraduates, 21 graduates)
Students non-science majors
Students from four different majors:
Bachelor of professional studies
Early childhood education
Middle-level education
Secondary education

37. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Will the flipped teaching strategy improve pre-service teachers’ learning outcomes compared to lectures-based teaching strategy in a technology integration and language arts course?
Will the flipped teaching strategy improve pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in a technology integration and language arts course?
What is the perception of pre-service teachers regarding the use of flipped teaching strategy in a technology integration and language arts course?

38. RESULTS
First question: “Will the flipped teaching strategy improve preservice teachers’ learning outcomes compared to lectures-based teaching strategy in a technology integration course?”
A paired-samples t-test conducted to compare students mean test scores in the flipped and lecture-based
The analysis show that there were significant differences in the students’ mean test scores in flipped teaching method compared to lecture-based

39. Paired-samples t-test
Table 1 The Mean scores and standard deviations for the paired-samples t-test results of the all test in flipped and traditional teaching strategies
Paired Differences t Df
Sig. (2-tailed)
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Lower
Upper
Pair 1
Chapter 5_15
3.258
2.160
.388
2.466
4.050
8.399 30
.000
Pair 2
Chapter 6_15
8.065
4.980
.894
6.238
9.891
9.017
Pair 3
Chapter 7_15
2.222
2.100
.404
1.391
3.053
5.498 26
Pair 4
Chapter 8_15
3.345
2.075
.385
2.556
4.134
8.681 28
Note: Means with different subscripts differ significantly at p<.001

40. RESULTS
Second question: Will the flipped teaching strategy improve preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in a technology integration and language arts course?
A paired-samples t-test conducted
The analysis show that there were significant differences in the students’ self-efficacy mean scores after flipped teaching strategy compared to no lecture teaching strategy

41. Paired-samples t-test
Table 2 The Mean scores and standard deviations for the paired-samples t-test results of students’ self-efficacy before and after the use of flipped teaching model
Paired Differences t df
Sig.
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower
Upper
Before - After
19.927
-4.652 36
.000
Note: Significant at p < level

42. RESULTS
Second question: What is the perception of pre-service teachers regarding the use of flipped teaching strategy in a technology integration and language arts course?
Collect data from 60 students through answering 12 questions to assess their perception on the flipped teaching strategy
The results were agree 452 (62.9%), disagree 104 (14.5%) and neither agree or disagree were 163 (22.7%)

44. Questions? Mohamed Ibrahim Aileen Watts Arkansas Tech University
Aileen Watts
Arkansas Tech University