1. CINS Data Presentation
John Keltz
1/18/2017
APS Research & Evaluation

2. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

3. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

4. Cohort graduation rate
Short version: percentage of students in 2016 cohort who graduate in four years
2016 cohort is students who entered 9th grade in 2012
Mobile students are only attributed to their last school attended

5. Cohort graduation rate
2016 Cohort: all students who entered ninth grade in 2012, and therefore should graduate in 2016
All cohort 2016 students who graduate in four years
Cohort
Graduation Rate =
All cohort 2016 students who graduate in four years
All cohort 2016 students who drop out
All cohort 2016 students who are still enrolled + +
Not included in equation: students who transfer to another school

6. Graduation Rate 293 Graduates 293 Graduates 33 Dropouts
Grady 2016 Cohort
Grad Rate =
= 293/339 = %
293 Graduates
33 Dropouts
13 Still Enrolled + +
Above calculation does not include 193 transfers from Grady to a different school
Dropout codes
19 Unknown
9 Other adult education
5 (other reasons)

7. Grady Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity

8. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

9. Elementary Milestones Results

13. Middle School Milestones Results

17. High School Milestones Results

21. District Comparison Challenge index
Includes poverty, ELL, and mobility rates
Rates are combined according to formula that best predicts test scores
Explains 94% of variance in test scores
Does not include charters, but state comparison will

22. APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

23. APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

24. APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle
Inman has an additional 13% of students scoring proficient compared to Sutton

25. APS 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High
Inman has an additional 13% of students scoring proficient compared to Sutton
*High school challenge index does not include mobility

26. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

27. State Comparison Test scores vs needs index
Uses combination of variables that best predict test scores
Includes poverty, ELL, and race/ethnicity
Index created by Jarod Apperson
Challenge index explains 80% of variance at state level
Less than district model

28. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

29. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

30. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Elementary

31. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

32. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

33. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: Middle

34. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

35. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

36. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

37. Georgia 2016 Milestones Score vs Challenge Index: High

38. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

39. National Comparison
Reardon et. Al.
Milestones conversion

40. United States Poverty vs. Grade Level
Image from The Upshot, data from Reardon et al

41. United States Poverty vs. Grade Level
Atlanta
Public
Schools
Image from The Upshot, data from Reardon et al

42. Milestones National Percentiles
Scale score vs. national percentile, APS eighth grade Science Milestones, 2015

43. Milestones ELA Distribution: Georgia
Grade
Beginning
Developing
Proficient
Distinguished
Dev & Above
Proficient & Above 3
33.2%
31.8%
26.6%
8.4%
66.8%
35.0% 4
30.5%
34.2%
26.2%
9.1%
69.5%
35.3% 5
25.0%
34.3%
34.5%
6.2%
75.0%
40.7% 6
31.5%
29.2%
32.0%
7.2%
68.5%
39.2% 7
27.2%
34.4%
32.9%
5.6%
72.8%
38.5% 8
20.1%
35.9%
35.8%
8.2%
79.9%
43.9%

44. Milestones to National Conversion

45. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

46. CCRPI Components Components # of Elements Wt./ Pts. Elements
Achievement 3 50
Content Mastery
Post E/M/H School Readiness
Predictor for High School Graduation
Progress 4 40
4 core subject areas
Achievement Gap 10
Gap Size and Gap Progress
Challenge Points 2
(Max.)
ED/EL/SWD Performance
Exceeding the Bar
CCRPI is a complex system that includes many components.
However, many of the parts are determined by performance on the Georgia Milestones.

47. Elementary CCRPI

48. Middle School CCRPI

49. High School CCRPI

50. High School CCRPI

51. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

52. Percentiles State percentile rank of average Milestones score
Better for making comparisons across years

53. Inman Percentiles
*8th grade advanced math students are not included

54. Grady Percentiles

55. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

56. Progress Percentage of students making medium or high growth
Used in CCRPI
State average is 65

57. Inman Progress

58. Grady Progress

59. Content Graduation Rate Performance Comparison Performance Drill-Down
District
State
National
Performance Drill-Down
CCRPI
Percentiles
Progress
Resources

60. Resources APS R&E website APS Data Blog: APSgraphs.blogspot.com
APS home page > Departments > Research and Evaluation
Or: atlantapublicschools.us/research-and-evaluation
APS Data Blog: APSgraphs.blogspot.com