1. Make Every Vote Count 2015
Campaign Webinar 1

2. Presentation followed by question and answer
Type your questions into the question box on your control panel and raise your hand
We may not get to all the questions! 2

3. We will cover: What is Fair Vote Canada?
Why do we need proportional representation?
A brief look the problems with winner-take-all voting
Why make votes count? A look at the research
Make Every Vote Count 2015 campaign
How can you get involved? 3

4. Fair Vote Canada is a national, multi-partisan, grassroots citizens campaign for proportional representation!
We support proportional representation at all levels of government: federal, provincial, and municipal.
We have over 30 local teams, 35,000 signers on our Declaration of Voters’ Rights. 4

5. Your vote should count towards electing a representative you want.
Results should be proportional to the popular vote
(if a party gets 30% of the vote, they should get roughly 30% of the seats). 5

6. 6

7. winner-take-all voting
A few problems with
winner-take-all voting 7

8. An Electoral Math Lesson8 8 8

9. Bloc – 1.3 million votes = 49 seats Greens - 940,000 votes = 0 seats
2008 federal results:
Bloc – 1.3 million votes = 49 seats
Greens ,000 votes = 0 seats 9 9 9

10. 2008 Federal Election 1.3 Million votes = 49 Seats
Greens 940,000 votes = 0 Seats 10 10 10

11. Saskatchewan Federal 2011 Results
56% voted Conservative
Conservatives won 13 out of 14 seats
56% support = 92% seats 11 11

12. Alberta 2011 Federal Results
66% voted Conservative
Conservatives won 26 out of 27 seats
66% support = 96% seats 12 12

13. Quebec 2011 Federal Results NDP won 59 of the 75 seats in Quebec
Orange Crush?
NDP won 59 of the 75 seats in Quebec
43% popular vote = 78% seats 13 13

14. First-past-the-post PR
2008 Federal Results
First-past-the-post PR 23 49 28
117 37
143 57 77 81 14

15. 15

16. A “mandate” for our government?
2006: Elected on 36.27% of popular vote
2008: Elected on 37.65% of popular vote
2011: Majority government on 39.62% of the popular vote
1.96 % more of the vote = 23 more seats = 100% power 16 16

17. 17

18. Wasted votes 2011 = 7,280,599 Approx 50% each election
Liberal ,211,697
NDP ,117,112
Green   ,205
Conservative ,455,077
Bloc ,805
Other:   ,703 18

19. Kitchener-Waterloo 2008
36.1%
63.9% 19 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22

23. 23

24. 24

25. Problems with winner-take-all voting
Distorted results
Regional polarization
Wasted votes
Safe seats
Negative (strategic) voting
Campaigns aimed at a few swing votes in a few swing ridings
Adversarial politics
Low Voter Turnout
Suppression of minority views
Barrier to electing more women and minorities 25 25 25

26. 26

27. Why proportional representation?
A look at the evidence for making votes count 27

28. PR and Democracy Arend Lijphart – 36 countries over 55 yrs
voter turnout 7.5% higher
government policies closer to the
view of the median voter
citizens more satisfied with democracy
8% more women were elected 28

29. governments in 20 countries, with a major finding that:
McDonald, Mendes and Budge (2004) looked at 254 elections producing 471
governments in 20 countries, with a major finding that:
Proportional systems created governments which better reflected the views of the median voter 29

30. 30

31. PR and Income Inequality
"Consensual political institutions tend to reduce income inequalities whereas majoritarian institutions have the opposite effect" (Birchfield and Crepaz, 1998, p. 192)
Countries with proportional systems had lower income inequality - a “strong and significant effect” (Lijphart, 2012 p. 282) 31 31 31

32. Countries with PR systems scored 6 points higher on the Yale Environmental Performance Index, which measures 10 policy areas, incl. environmental health, air quality, resource management, biodiversity and habitat, forestry, fisheries, agriculture, climate change
(Lijphart, 2012)
PR and Environment 32 32 32

33. Countries with PR were faster to ratify the Kyoto protocol
the percentage of world total carbon emissions decreased in PR countries while it increased in other countries or remained static
(Cohen, 2010)
PR and Environment 33

34. Is this the face of Canada?
And not only are relatively few of us voting in Toronto elections, but look at the outcomes.
When you look at a picture of the Toronto City Council, are you seeing the face of Toronto?
In one of the world’s most culturally diverse cities, 9 of 10 council members are white – 8 of 10 are men.
Is this the face of Canada? 34 34 34

35. PR and Women
Almost any country with 30% or more women in its upper legislature uses a form of PR
Countries with PR elect 8% more women on average 35

36. 36

37. 37

38. PR and Economy
Countries with moderately proportional systems were less likely to have deficits and more likely to have fiscal surpluses
(Carey and Hix, London School of Economics, 2009) 38

39. PR and Economy
Knutsen (2011) looked at 107 countries from 1820 to “country years” and
found that:
Both proportional and semi-proportional systems produced higher economic growth than plurality-majoritarian - "a strong, significant effect" (p.86) 39

40. PR and Stability
Between 1945 and 1998, countries using first-past-the-post averaged 16.7 elections, while countries using proportional systems averaged 16 elections (Pilon, 2007)
Hugh Segal: Proportional Representation and Economic Policy 40

41. 41

42. 42

43. 43

44. 2. Implementing the model in time for the following election.
To determine the best model of Proportional Representation for Canada, we call on federal parties and candidates to commit to:
1. Conducting a citizen-led consultation process immediately following the next federal election.
2. Implementing the model in time for the following election. 44

45. We must elect a majority of MPs to the House of Commons in 2015 who are committed to making our votes count. 45

46. Where Do the Parties Stand Now?46

47. Don’t support PR (last support for PR was a Progressive Conservative Party Resolution in 2002)47

48. 48

49. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT immediately after the next election, an all-Party process be instituted, involving expert assistance and citizen participation, to report to Parliament within 12 months with recommendations for electoral reforms including, without limitation, a preferential ballot and/or a form of proportional representation, to represent Canadians more fairly and serve Canada better. 49

50. 50

51. 51

52. Key Liberal MPs for PR: Joyce Murray
Stephane Dion 52

53. 53

54. Scott Simms is now in favour of adding proportionality to our system
Interesting fact:
The last 3 Liberal Democratic Reform Critics – Stephane Dion, Carolyn Bennett and Mauril Belanger – have all been in favour of PR. 54

55. 55

56. 56

57. 57

58. NDP Democratic Reform Critic Craig Scott is doing a tour across Canada explaining MMP and getting feedback from Canadians. 58

59. Elizabeth May did a “Save Democracy from Politics” tour last year.
The Charter of Global Greens includes proportional representation as one of their principles
Elizabeth May did a “Save Democracy from Politics” tour last year.
The Green Party of Canada and Fair Vote Canada were both intervenors in a court case against first-past-the-post 59

60. 60

61. 61

62. Key components of Make Every Vote Count 2015
Working with allies to make electoral reform an election issue
Getting the word out to Canadians through the work of our supporters, media and social media
Encouraging supporters to work for candidates who support PR 62

63. How can you get involved?63

64. 64

65. Help us get to 100,000 signatures on the Declaration of Voters’ Rights
Share: 65

66. Donate 66

67. Help us on the ground in your riding in 2015!67

68. Liberals for Fair Voting Conservatives for Fair Voting
Join a FVC caucus:
Greens for Fair Voting
NDP for Fair Voting
Liberals for Fair Voting
Conservatives for Fair Voting
Women for Fair Voting
Fair Vote Youth 68

69. Thank you for helping to Make 2015 the Last Unfair Election!69