1. Content of the Corotsky Databases (Present Status)
S. Charpinet (LA2T/OMP)
M. Deleuil (LAM)
J. Cuvilo (CESR/OMP)
J.-C Meunier (LAM)
J. Platzer (LA2T/OMP)
E. Bourrec (LA2T)
G. Vauclair (LA2T)

2. What is behind Corotsky ?
The tool Corotsky is being developped by GMV as part of the Spanish contribution to COROT
The databases behind CorotSky →
See the document « Content Description of the Corotsky Asteroseismology and Exoplanet Search Databases » available from the Corotsky web page at CNES:
Stars brighter than V=9.5
Centre/Anticentre directions
~12,000 stars
Large amount of data from catalogs and dedicated GBO
Mostly Implemented
Stars with 9.5 ≤ V ≤ 17
Centre/Anticentre directions
~4,000 objects
Stars of interest for additional programs
Partly Implemented
Stars with 12 ≤ V ≤ 16
Centre/Anticentre directions
~10,000,000 stars from cat.
BVRI data + identification for ~3,000,000 stars from GBO around principal targets
Partly Implemented

3. The Seismology Database: Data From Catalogues
The Core of the Database :
Contains all the stars referenced in the CDS/SIMBAD database :
Brighter than V=9.5
Within the 15° cones around the Center / Anticentre directions (Scenario 4)
11,911 stars
Parameters from Catalogues :
Main sources: Simbad / Hipparcos
Values, errors, sources
Parameter
Source
Identifiers
SIMBAD
RA (2000)
DEC (2000) V
B-V
SIMBAD/HIP
Spectral Type
Proper Motion
Parallax
HIPPARCOS
Vrad
SIMBAD/GBO
Teff Mv

4. The Seismology Database: Determination of Stellar Parameters
Strömgren photometry :
Observations at Obs. of Sierra Nevada
(R. Garrido et al.)
Stars V ≤ 8 (~ 1000 objects; Scenario 4)
Stars V ≤ 9.5 (around principal targets)
Photometric data available from the GAUDI database (E. Solano; LAEFF)
High resolution spectroscopy :
Observations at/with OHP/ELODIE,
LaSilla/FEROS, TNG/SARG, …
(C. Catala, E. Poretti et al.)
Spectra available from the GAUDI database (E. Solano; LAEFF)
3rd party contributions :
Templogg Mv, Teff, log g, [Fe/H]
(R. Garrido, A. Kaiser et al.)
Tgmet (C.Soubiran)
Mv, Teff, log g, [Fe/H]
(OHP, FEROS?, SARG?)
Detailed Analysis (P. Magain et al.)
Teff, log g, [Fe/H]
Ha line wings (C. Van’t Veer)
Teff
LSD (C. Catala)
Vrad, Vsin i, SB2
(OHP, FEROS, SARG)
if Vsin i > 200 km/s (A.-M. Hubert)
Vsin i
Mv, Teff, log g, [Fe/H]
(various sources)

5. The Seismology Database: Adopted Teff, Mv, log g & [Fe/H]
Teff Adopted :
For each star in the database, a value is adopted according to the data available and by order of priority (P) of the method used for the determination. P
Method
Conditions / Comments
Source
Rec.
Impl.
# of stars
# adopted 1
Detailed analysis
Magain et al.
yes 5
5 (100%)
Bruntt et al. no 2
IR SED
4000 K ≤ Teff ≤ 9000 K
Ribas et al.
4701
4696 (99.8%) 3
Be stars line fitting
Neiner et al. 48
44 (91.7%) 4
OB stars line fitting
Lefever et al.
Hα line wings
5500 K ≤ Teff ≤ 8500 K
Van’t Veer et al.
248
16 (6.5%) 6
Literature
Soubiran et al.
164
100 (61%) 7
OB stars Geneva Phot.
Aerts et al.
184
160 (87%) 8
Strömgren / Templogg
V ≤ 8 (full corot eyes)
Kaiser et al.
yes†
1115
517 (46.4%)
V ≤ 9.5 (near P. targets) 9
Spectroscopy / Tgmet
Teff ≤ 8000 K, Vsini ≤ 30
yes‡
417
8 (1.9%) 10
Strömgren HM 11
V-I Conversion
(obsolete ?)
Charpinet et al. 12
B-V / Allen
11082
5562 (50.2%)
† : old calibration; new calibration under test ‡ : from OHP data only

6. The Seismology Database: Adopted Teff, Mv, log g & [Fe/H]
MV Adopted :
For each star in the database, a value is adopted according to the data available and by order of priority (P) of the method used for the determination. P
Method
Conditions / Comments
Source
Rec.
Impl.
# of stars
# adopted 1
Literature
Soubiran et al. no 2
Parallax Δπ/π ≤ 10%
Charpinet et al.
yes
415
415 (100%) 3
Be stars line fitting
Neiner et al. 48
44 (91.7%) 4
OB stars line fitting
Lefever et al. 5
Strömgren / Phystar
Jordi et al. 6
OB stars Geneva Phot.
Aerts et al.
184
165 (89.7%) 7
Strömgren / Templogg
V ≤ 8 (full corot eyes)
Kaiser et al.
yes†
903
511 (56.6%)
V ≤ 9.5 (near P. targets) 8
Spectroscopy / Tgmet
Teff ≤ 8000 K, Vsini ≤ 30
yes‡
411
101 (24.6%) 9
Strömgren HM 10
Par. 10 < Δπ/π % ≤ 30
1240
898 (72.4%) 11
AV Ribas
Catala et al.
4139
3264 (78.9%) 12
Parallax Default
Δπ/π ≥ 30%
10265
6522 (63.5%)
(no value)
812
† : old calibration; new calibration under test
‡ : from OHP data only

7. The Seismology Database: Adopted Teff, Mv, log g & [Fe/H]
Log g Adopted :
For each star in the database, a value is adopted according to the data available and by order of priority (P) of the method used for the determination. P
Method
Conditions / Comments
Source
Rec.
Impl.
# of stars
# adopted 1
Detailed analysis
Magain et al.
yes 5
5 (100%)
Bruntt et al. no 2
Be stars line fitting
Neiner et al. 48
44 (91.7%) 3
OB stars line fitting
Lefever et al. 4
Literature
Soubiran et al.
141
134 (95%)
OB stars Geneva Phot.
Aerts et al.
184
161 (87.5%) 6
Strömgren / Templogg
V ≤ 8 (full corot eyes)
Kaiser et al.
yes†
1016
775 (76.3%)
V ≤ 9.5 (near P. targets) 7
Spectroscopy / Tgmet
Teff ≤ 8000 K, Vsini ≤ 30
yes‡
417
43 (10.3%) 8
Strömgren HM 9
IR SED
4000 K ≤ Teff ≤ 9000 K
Ribas et al.
4701
4344 (92.4%)
(no value)
6414
† : old calibration; new calibration under test ‡ : from OHP data only

8. The Seismology Database: Adopted Teff, Mv, log g & [Fe/H]
[Fe/H] Adopted :
For each star in the database, a value is adopted according to the data available and by order of priority (P) of the method used for the determination. P
Method
Conditions / Comments
Source
Rec.
Impl.
# of stars
# of adopted 1
Detailed analysis
Magain et al.
yes 5
5 (100%)
Bruntt et al. no 2
OB stars line fitting
Lefever et al. 3
Literature
Soubiran et al.
136
132 (97%) 4
Strömgren / Templogg
V ≤ 8 (full corot eyes)
Kaiser et al.
yes†
534
502 (94.0%)
V ≤ 9.5 (near P. targets)
Spectroscopy / Tgmet
Teff ≤ 8000 K, Vsini ≤ 30
yes‡
380
56 (14.7%) 6
Strömgren HM 7
IR SED
4000 K ≤ Teff ≤ 9000 K
Ribas et al.
4701
4350 (92.5%)
(no value)
6875
† : old calibration; new calibration under test ‡ : from OHP data only

9. The Seismology Database: Star Type Catalogues
Stars of specific interest :
Primary candidates
Variable stars
Peculiar stars …
Catalogues that define star types in the database
Current status :
Implementation of the VISAT catalogues (Obs. Vienna; W. Weiss et al.) for the seismology channel
26 referenced startypes

10. Cross-identification
The AP-Exo Table :
9.5 11 17 mV
Sismo Database
Complete down
to V=9.5
Simbad
Exoplanet Database
EXODAT near principal targets only
USNO-A2 (Corot eyes → reference)
AP-Exo Table
Lists of specific objects from APWG
11 ≤ V ≤ 17 19
contamination
Saturating
stars
for Exo
Bright AP
Stars
From APWG
9.5 ≤ V ≤ 11
Cross-identification
with USNO-A2 +
Inclusion in
(and EXODAT)

11. The AP-Exo Table :
Type of star: e.g., eclipsing binary, sdB star, PMS star, …
(whatever is relevant for Corot)
Preferred Name
for the star
(only one name)
B and R photometry as
provided by the USNO-A2
catalog (for consistency checks)
Ref.name V
Startype(s)
USNO-A2 Number
RA (°)
DEC (°) B R …
KPD
13.83
sdB star
13.6
13.9
Cross-identification with USNO-A2.
Provides the link with the Exoplanet database effectively used to select targets in the Exoplanet field.
Coordinates as provided by the
USNO-A2 Catalog.
Ensures homogeneity of the coordinates
In the AP-Exo Table.

12. To do list for the Sismo / AP-Exo DBs
Seismology Database :
1. Implement missing methods for star fundamental parameter determinations
Detailed analysis (Bruntt et al.) : no data received (1st quarter 2005?)
OB Star Line Fitting (Lefever et al.) : no data received (1st quarter 2005?)
MV from literature (C. Soubiran ?) : no data received
Strömgren / phystar (Jordi et al.) : no data received (1st quarter 2005?)
2. Complete the DB description document.
Contribution of each group/person who provided fundamental parameters: write a short description
(~ 1 page) of the method employed, including references to any related published work.
AP-Exo table implementation :
1. Implement the new lists of AP potential targets cross-identified with USNO-A2
2. Migrate the brightest AP stars (9.5 < V < 11) to the seismology database