Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byChristopher Davidson Modified over 7 years ago
1
Telemedicine to Expedite Patient Transfer-the Cell Phone Experience
Lowell Satler, MD Director Of Cardiac Catheterization Lab Washington Hospital Center Washington, DC
2
I/we have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Lowell F. Satler, MD I/we have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
3
Telemedicine to Expedite Patient Transfer-the Cell Phone Experience
Lowell Satler, MD Director Of Cardiac Catheterization Lab Washington Hospital Center Washington, DC Better Triage
4
Hospital fibrinolysis: Onset of symptoms of STEMI
Options for Transport of Patients With STEMI and Initial Reperfusion Treatment Hospital fibrinolysis: Door-to-Needle within 30 min. Not PCI capable Call 9-1-1 Call fast EMS on-scene Encourage 12-lead pre-hospital ECGs Onset of symptoms of STEMI 9-1-1 EMS Dispatch Inter-Hospital Transfer PCI capable GOALS 5 min. 8 min. EMS Transport Options for Transportation of STEMI Patients and Initial Reperfusion Treatment: Goals Reperfusion in patients with STEMI can be accomplished by the pharmacologic (fibrinolysis) or catheter-based (primary PCI) approaches. The overarching goal is to keep total ischemic time within 120 minutes (ideally within 60 minutes) from symptom onset to initiation of reperfusion treatment. The medical system goal is to facilitate rapid recognition and treatment of patients with STEMI such that door-to-needle (or medical-contact-to-needle) for initiation of fibrinolytic therapy can be achieved within 30 minutes or door-to-balloon (or medical-contact-to-balloon) for PCI can be achieved within 90 minutes. These goals should not be understood as “ideal” times, but rather the longest times that should be considered acceptable for a given system. Systems that are able to achieve even more rapid times for treatment of patients with STEMI should be encouraged. Note “medical contact” is defined as the “time of EMS arrival on scene” after the patient calls EMS/9-1-1 or the “time of arrival at the emergency department door” (whether PCI-capable or non-PCI-capable hospital) when the patient self-transports. Patient EMS Prehospital fibrinolysis EMS-to-needle within 30 min. EMS transport EMS-to-balloon within 90 min. Patient self-transport Hospital door-to-balloon within 90 min. Dispatch 1 min. System delay
6
Currently Available System: STEMI Management Solution
How does it work? EMS Transmits Data via Broadband Hospital Receives Data via internet Care Teams Share Data and Act on Data
7
Prehospital ECG transmission
Advantages Limitations Improves system performance-allows team to prepare cath lab and secures additional staff interventionalist Reorganizes ED priorities Creates rapid pathway through ED-identification, authorization Fails to establish two way communication for feedback and interaction May not link “walk-ins” to CODE HEART Team response
8
Defibrillator WOW Desktop Cell phone
9
EMR HIPPA Compliant
10
Code Heart
17
Cloud storage and retrieval
LiveCast CODE Heart WIFI Cloud storage and retrieval 4G Monitor multiple live streams Comprehensive real-time feed statistics Auto-archiving for download and editing
18
STEMI+PCI: WHC (Jan 2013) DTB 52’ DTB 115’ DTB 62’ DTB 42’
2/5: Chandler; 32 min door-lab, 41 min lab-start; 13 min start-PCI. Delay with interventionalist arrival (Waksman) DTB 42’
19
DTB
20
STEMI System Activations CHap Activations versus Standard Activations (3/14/2011 to 3/31/2012)
470 STEMI System Activations (Transfers 288) 83 CHap Activation (Transfers 37) 49 STEMI (Transfers 25) 47 PCI (Transfers 24) 2 No PCI (Transfers 1) 34 Not STEMI (Transfers 12) 2 PCI (Transfers 1) 32 No PCI (Transfers 11) 387 Standard Activation (Transfers 251) 193 STEMI (Transfers 145) 178 PCI (Transfers 134) 15 No PCI (Transfers 11) 194 Not STEMI (Transfers 106) 45 PCI (Transfers 30) 149 No PCI (Transfers 76) CHap Activation Standard Activation CHap PCI Standard PCI
21
Quality measures for STEMI management
CHap (n=47) Minutes mean [95%CI] Standard (n=178) p Value Door to balloon time 102.6 [ ] 149.4 [ ] <0.0001 First call to balloon 70.2 [ ] 92.3 [ ] 0.0002 CathLab arrival to balloon 37.8 [ ] 36.9 [ ] 0.706 CathLab arrival to case start 16.7 [ ] 15.9 [ ] 0.655 Electrocardiogram to first call 34.8[ ] 96.7 [ ] 0.091 Case start to balloon 21.1 [ ] 21.0 [ ] 0.948
22
Recent Changes EDs have lower threshold for trigger CODEHEART protocols desire to meet expected time standards borderline ECG “troponinitis”
23
Enhances real time two way communications between providers
In the last months, the CodeHeart app has been activated 300 times-only 30 True STEMI’s were identified Enhances real time two way communications between providers
24
62 yo male; DM, Hypertension; new onset CP
25
57 yo female; CP for 2 hours; elevated lipids known FH (sister with recent MI
26
76 yo male, intermettent CP for last week; now SOB
27
42 yo strong FH with coughing x 2 weeks; woke up this morning with ongoing CP
28
82 yo with fatigue; recently discharged after subdural 2 weeks ago; SOB this AM; trop 0.3
29
59 yo diabetic with abdominal and epigastric pain for 2-3 hours
30
Interest in post-resuscitation care has risen with the development of treatment modalities that can affect long-term survival rates even when begun after the systematic ischemia/reperfusion insult associated with cardiac arrest. Mild therapeutic hypothermia has become the foundation for improvement of neurologically favorable survival after cardiac arrest. Reperfusion therapy, specifically early percutaneous coronary intervention, is becoming an important adjunct to therapeutic hypothermia. Identifying which post– cardiac arrest patient had an occluded or unstable coronary vessel is difficult because such events are not reliably predicted by precedent symptoms or standard electrocardiographic analysis. Increasing clinical experience suggests that resuscitated cardiac arrest victims without an obvious noncardiac etiology should undergo emergency coronary angiography and, where indicated, percutaneous coronary intervention.
31
“Dumas et al. (38), reporting for the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) registry, on 435 cardiac arrests taken directly to coronary angiography status after resuscitation, found no differences in age, initial rhythm, or other common risk factors between those with ST-segment elevation (n 134) or those without ST segment elevation (n 301). Those without ST-segment elevation had a variety of ECG findings, including St segment depression (29%), conduction abnormalities (20%), and nonspecific changes (9%), with some even being normal (11%). Significant coronary lesions were found in 58% of those without ST-segment elevation, and nearly one-half of these had PCI (78 of 176). Hospital survival was significantly higher in patients with successful PCI versus those having no or unsuccessful PCI. This was true for patients with and without ST-segment elevation. Multivariable analysis showed successful PCI to be an independent predictor of good outcome, regardless of the initial post– cardiac arrest electrocardiographic pattern. These investigators concluded that immediate PCI (combined with therapeutic hypothermia) results in improved survival for OHCA patients with no obvious noncardiac cause, whether or not their electrocardiogram manifests ST-segment elevation”.
32
Prompt initiation of mild hypothermia in unresponsive patients
Critical Care Pathway for Post Cardiac Arrest Patients with Return of Spontaneous Circulation Prompt initiation of mild hypothermia in unresponsive patients Cardiac Arrest with ROSC First Documented Rhythm? VT / VF PEA / Asystole Most patients are unlikely to benefit from invasive cardiac intervention ST Elevation or Hemodynamic instability No ST Elevation nor Hemodynamic instability ECG after ROSC Code Heart CCU ST Elevation No ST Elevation Consult with interventionalist for further management Consider admission to MICU
33
Critical Care Pathway for Patients with Moderate to High Acuity Illness Other Than Cardiac Arrest or STEMI Referred to WHC Cardiologists (usually presumptive NSTEMI) Patient at OSH Patient brought by EMS Clinical Triage by WHC Cardiologist Is it clear that patient will benefit from urgent invasive cardiac intervention? WHC ED Yes No or Uncertain Is chief clinical problem clearly due to cardiac disease? ED Team assumes patient care with prompt consultation with Fellow and/or Cardiologist for rapid final disposition Yes No or Uncertain Direct Admit to Cath Lab Clinical instability? Yes No Uncertain Admit to CCU Admit to other Unit at WHC Triage in MedStar by Cardiology Fellow
34
Prehospital ECGs & Activation Conclusions
An EMS-based PH ECG protocol involving prehospital interpretation without physician oversight, direct cardiac catheterization laboratory activation, and ED bypass resulted in significant reductions in median DTB and FMCTB intervals for those identified as STEMI in the prehospital setting. Nestler DM et al: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 4: , 2011
35
Delays to reperfusion Patient delay System Delay Treatment delay
Arrival At PCI center Symptom onset Contact to health care system Arrival at local hospital Departure from local hospital PPCI Patient delay System Delay Treatment delay
36
Conclusions – Emergency medical services transportation to the hospital is underused among contemporary ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Nevertheless, use of EMS transportation is associated with substantial reductions in ischemic time and treatment delays. Community education efforts are needed to improve the use of emergency transport as part of system-wide strategies to improve ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction reperfusion care.
37
Conclusions Continue to optimize system performance
IC should have an important role in communication with the EMS and the Referring ED and review the ECG to better identify and select optimal use of emergency angiography Follow algorithms for out OHCA to avoid treatment of the futile patient Encourage broader programs of education regarding patient awareness and recognition, promoting use of EMS transport to ED to further shorten patient and system delay to treatment
38
Thank you!
39
STEMI Stroke Trauma Dermatology Home Monitoring
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.