Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBasil Hancock Modified over 6 years ago
1
The Greenhouse Gas Connection to Sustainable Resource Management
2
In This Lesson By the end of this lesson students will be able to:
(Knowledge) Identify the fundamental principles and practices relating to SRM greenhouse gas emissions and reductions (Knowledge) Identify market impacts for recovered products and material and the associated GHG reduction impacts (Comprehension) Explain why communities are adopting community greenhouse gas protocols including SRM (Knowledge) Identify tools and metrics to measure and compare GHG impacts to sustainable management programs
3
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
4
Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Potentials
6
GHG Emission Sources And Sinks
7
Lifecycle Assessment: Principles and Practice
USEPA, 2006
8
WASTE management vs. MATERIALS management
Disposal Recovery Product Lifecycle
9
RECYCLING AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
Disposal Recycle Recovery Reuse Repair
10
Waste Reduction Model (WARM)
WARM can quantify and communicate GHG Benefits Metric tons of Carbon Equivalent (MTCE) Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2E) Energy benefits – British Thermal Units (BTU)
11
WARM Background WARM compares the emissions and offsets resulting from a material in a baseline and an alternative management pathway in order to provide decision-makers with comparative emission results. WARM does not include emissions from the use phase of a product’s life, since use does not have an effect on the waste management emissions of a product.
12
WARM Formula The general formula for net GHG emissions for each scenario modeled in WARM: Net GHG emissions = Gross manufacturing GHG emissions - (Increase in carbon stocks + Avoided utility GHG emissions)
13
Materials Management Decisions Affecting GHG Reduction:
Energy consumption (specifically combustion of fossil fuels) and the resulting GHG emissions associated with material extraction, manufacturing, transporting, and end-of-life management of the material or product . Non-energy-related manufacturing emissions, such as the carbon dioxide (CO2) released when limestone used in steel manufacturing is converted to lime, or the perfluorocarbons (PFCs) generated during the aluminum smelting process.
14
Materials Management Decisions Affecting GHG Reduction:
Methane (CH4) emissions from decomposition of organic materials in landfills. CO2 and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from waste combustion. Carbon sequestration and storage, which refer to natural or manmade processes that remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it for long periods or permanently.
15
Recycling and Composting Emissions Protocol: July 2013
16
Relationships to WARM Use WARM factors, EXCEPT
Carbon storage only in forests 0.75 landfill gas capture (consistent with community protocol) Includes compost emission reduction for chemical fertilizer displacement
17
For Avoided Disposal, by Disposal Facility Type
Overall Reductions From using recycled inputs instead of virgin inputs (mixed recyclables) For Avoided Disposal, by Disposal Facility Type Landfill with no gas collection Landfill with gas collection but no energy recovery Landfill with gas collection and energy recovery Combustion facility -2.8 -1.75 -0.47 -0.28 0.42 All reductions are shown as MTCO2E (metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
18
Calculating GHG Emissions
T = tons EF = emission factor MTCO2E = Metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent T * EF = MTCO2E
19
http://www. arb. ca. gov/cc/protocols/localgov/pubs/recycling_method
20
Recycling Emission Reduction Factors (Table 11)
Material Total Upstream Emission Reductions (a) Remanufacture Transportation Emissions (b) Forest Carbon Seq. (c) Recycling Efficiency (d) RERF (a-b+c) *d Aluminum 14 0.07 0.93 12.9 Steel 1.7 0.16 0.98 1.5 Glass 0.2 0.02 0.88 HDPE 1.1 0.09 0.77 0.8 PET 2 0.15 1.4 Corrugated cardboard 1.3 0.1 4.2 5 Magazines/3rd class mail 0.5 0.67 0.3 Newspaper 1 2.9 0.89 3.4 Office paper 2.4 4.8 0.6 4.3 Telephone books 1.2 2.7 Dimensional lumber N/A 0.21 Mixed Plastics 0.13
22
Compost Emission Factors (Table 8)
Emissions Emission type Emission (MTCO2E/ton of feedstock) Transportation emissions (Te) 0.008 Process emissions (Pe) Fugitive CH4 emissions (Fe) 0.078 Fugitive N2O emissions (Fe) 0.025 Total 0.119
23
Compost Emission Reduction Factors (Table 8)
Emission reductions Emission reduction type Emission reduction (MTCO2E/ton of compost) Conversion factor Final Emission reduction (MTCO2E/ton of feedstock) Increased Soil Carbon Storage (Csb) N/A 0.26 Decreased Water Use (Wb) 0.04 0.5 0.02 Decreased Soil Erosion (Eb) 0.25 0.13 Decreased Fertilizer Use (Fb) Decreased Herbicide Use (Hb) Total 0.54 Overall 0.42
24
California Legislation Connecting GHG Reduction and Recycling
Connections to AB 341 Connections to AB 32 AB % recycling by 2020 = reduced disposal & GHGs 22 million tons removed from disposal; equals 20 – 30 MMTCO2e reduction Waste Management Sector Plan identifies activities to help achieve 75% recycling by 2020 Purpose: To reduce the level of statewide greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 to 1990 levels AB Scoping Plan update includes a comprehensive and sustainable waste management system Waste Management Sector Plan identifies activities to achieve significant GHG reductions
25
Waste Management Sector Plan – GHG and waste reduction goals
2020 Goal: Achieve the AB % recycling goal and associated 20 to 30 MMTCO2e reduction 2035 Goal: Achieve Net-Zero GHG emissions from the entire Waste Sector and associated GHG reductions 2050 Goal: Achieve a 25% reduction in direct GHG emissions from 2035 levels Waste Management Sector Plan – GHG and waste reduction goals
28
Cap and trade investment plan
$50 million approved to CalRecycle through 2015/2016 with another $35 proposed in the 2015/2016 budget New Grant & Loan Programs for Greenhouse Gas Reductions from Organics and Manufacturing with Recyclable Materials (Fibers, Plastic, and Glass)
29
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Waste Diversion
2 Grant Programs ($20 million) Organic materials ($15 million) Received over 50 applications requesting over $118 million Fiber, Plastic, and Glass ($5 million) Received 19 applications requesting over $35 million
30
As a class or individual activity complete Worksheet #14 to estimate GHG reductions and equivalent resource savings by a business that implements Zero Waste. Discuss Results.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.