Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hua G, Hier M, Forest VI, Mlynarek A, Payne R.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hua G, Hier M, Forest VI, Mlynarek A, Payne R."— Presentation transcript:

1 Hua G, Hier M, Forest VI, Mlynarek A, Payne R.
One-year experience after adapting to the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines for differentiated thyroid cancer at the Jewish General Hospital Hua G, Hier M, Forest VI, Mlynarek A, Payne R. Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada Introduction Results Conclusions In the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines for differentiated thyroid carcinoma, several new recommendations pertaining to the indications for biopsy of a thyroid nodule were suggested. The guidelines now recommend abstaining from performing a biopsy in thyroid nodules <1.5cm unless the ultrasound examination identifies suspicious characteristics – whereas the previous 2009 guidelines recommended a biopsy for all nodules ≥1cm. Fig. 1 Algorithm for evaluation and management of patients with thyroid nodules based on US pattern and FNA cytology; ATA Thyroid Nodule/DTC Guidelines 2015. This study suggests that, at our institution, patients with nodules <1.5cm who are selected for thyroidectomy are at a higher risk for malignancy and more aggressive disease when compared to patients with larger nodules. These findings may be a result of adapting to the 2015 ATA guidelines for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Contact: Richard J. Payne, MD, MSc, FRCSC Jewish General Hospital and McGill University 3755 Côte Ste Catherine, Suite E903 Montreal, QC H3T 1E2 Canada Table 1. Patient and Nodule Characteristics of the Study Cohort Variable All Nodules ≥1.5cm Nodules <1.5cm p-value Total (%) 313 258 (82.43) 55 (17.57) - Mean age (range), years (20-89) (20-89) (24-75) 0.1761 Sex (%) Male 72 (23.00) 60 (23.26) 12 (21.82) Female 241 (77.00) 198 (76.74) 43 (78.18) 1.0000 Mean nodule size on U/S (range), cm 2.836 ( ) 3.203 ( ) 1.115 ( ) <0.0001 Bethesda Classification (%) I (Non-diagnostic) 8 (2.56) 8 (3.10) 0 (0) 0.3588 II (Benign) 33 (10.54) 31 (12.02) 2 (3.64) 0.0880 III (AUS/FLUS) 74 (23.64) 67 (25.97) 7 (12.73) 0.0366 IV (FN/SFN) 34 (10.86) 32 (12.40) 0.0589 V (Suspicious for malignancy) 67 (21.41) 58 (22.48) 9 (16.36) 0.3688 VI (Malignant) 97 (30.99) 62 (24.03) 35 (63.64) Extent of Surgery (%) Hemi-/Subtotal Thyroidectomy 147 (46.96) 133 (51.55) 22 (40.00) Total Thyroidectomy 166 (53.04) 125 (48.45) 33 (60.00) 0.1382 Final Pathology (%) Benign 85 (27.16) 79 (30.62) 6 (10.91) Malignant 228 (72.84) 179 (69.38) 49 (89.09) 0.0024 Single nodule 137 (43.77) 113 (43.79) 24 (43.64) Multifocal disease 176 (56.23) 145 (56.20) 31 (56.36) Aggressive Features 65 (20.77) 47 (18.22) 18 (32.73) 0.0266 AUS/FLUS: atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN/SFN: follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm. “Aggressive Features” denote the presence lymph node metastasis and/or extra-thyroidal extension. References Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2016;26(1):1-133. Roti E, degli Uberti EC, Bondanelli M, Braverman LE. Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study. European journal of endocrinology. 2008;159(6): Roh JL, Kim JM, Park CI. Central cervical nodal metastasis from papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: pattern and factors predictive of nodal metastasis. Annals of surgical oncology. 2008;15(9): Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Inoue H, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, et al. An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World journal of surgery. 2010;34(1):28-35. Giordano D, Gradoni P, Oretti G, Molina E, Ferri T. Treatment and prognostic factors of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. 2010;35(2): Chow SM, Law SC, Chan JK, Au SK, Yau S, Lau WH. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid-Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and multifocality. Cancer. 2003;98(1):31-40. Table 2. Nodule Characteristics Stratified by Size and Bethesda Classification n Malignant (%) Aggressive Features (%) Bethesda Nodules <1.5cm Nodules >1.5cm p-value I 8 0.3588 0 (-) 4 (50.00) - 0 (0) II 2 31 0.0880 5 (16.13) 1.0000 III 7 67 0.0366 3 (42.86) 39 (58.21) 0.4570 3 (4.48) IV 32 0.589 2 (100) 21 (65.63) V 9 58 0.3688 9 (100) 48 (82.76) 0.3353 3 (33.33) 12 (20.69) 0.4075 VI 35 62 <0.0001 35 (100) 62 (100) 15 (42.86) 32 (51.61) 0.5261 Total 55 258 49 (89.09) 179 (69.38) 0.0024 18 (32.73) 47 (18.22) 0.0266 Aim The aim of this study was to present the experience at the Jewish General Hospital since the guidelines’ implementation. Fig. 2 Artist’s Rendition of a Thyroid Gland; verymom.com. Methods Of 313 patients, 228 (72.8%) were malignant on final pathology. 55 of 313 (17.6%) had a nodule <1.5cm. These smaller nodules were also more likely to present aggressive features than larger ones (32.7% vs. 18.2%; p=0.0266). Nodules <1.5cm were more likely to be malignant on biopsy (63.6% vs. 24.0%; p<0.0001) and on final pathology (89.1% vs. 69.4%; p=0.0024), compared to nodules ≥1.5cm. 46 of 46 (100%; 95% CI [0.908, 1.000]) nodules <1.5cm with Bethesda IV-VI were malignant on final pathology, compared to 131 of 152 (86.2%) of nodules ≥1.5cm with Bethesda IV-VI (p=0.0047). A retrospective study of 313 consecutive patients undergoing thyroidectomy from 2015 to 2016 was performed. Patients’ final pathology was compared to their thyroid nodule size on pre-operative ultrasound, biopsy result, age, sex, and extent of surgery.


Download ppt "Hua G, Hier M, Forest VI, Mlynarek A, Payne R."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google