1. March 9, 2015 52 Days to Demo Day Syllabus Oral 3 feedback
Demo Day Requirements/Prep
Final Report

2. ME 4973 Syllabus

3. Results: strong driver for grades
ME 4972 (Fall)
ME 4972 (Spring)
Communication
40%
20%
Written Reports
Oral Presentations
Professional Performance*
Effort/Attendance
Commitments
Technical Performance*
Techncial Performance*
30%
Problem Solving
Creativity
Results
Project Evaluation*
Demo Day
* includes faculty, instructors and sponsor feedback

4. Oral 3 Team Grades
Team progress and relevant results presented

5. Oral 3 Grades
Individual Grade – presentation skill and contribution

6. Oral 3 General Comments
In general , disappointing level of results shown
Very Poor Attendance (<30%)
Don’t turn your back on the audience
Look like you are interested in the project
Make sure all axes labels are legible No need to have 6 digits on your results (sig figs)
Explain, what do analysis results mean (for your project)

7. Oral 3 Comments
No results; basic description of test rig, no details; no details of testing plan.
Cannot read axes on graphs. What are the “.. factors” you refer to? What 𝜅 range do you expect to be in? Where will the sensor go in Experiment 1? Small amount of results, no experimental results or DOE results, and experimental rig not well thought out/presented. Don’t understand the utility of the results shown, seems like not much work yet.
Show many Ansys graphs with pretty colors, no idea how those colors got there, what they mean. Contours between nodes – how do they get there? Some Ansys results, rig built, not tested.

8. Oral 3 Comments
Showed good CFD results including effect of mesh independence
Generally pretty nice presentation, nice results so far but not enough yet. No error bars presented for results. Why were testing parameters chosen as they were?
Ask for help…

9. Experiments status 3/9

10. Demo Day Requirements Follow up on these requirements ME7 Capewell NoNo
120v
Compressed air supply - at least 40 psi needed.
ME8
CLARCOR EMS
DC Power Supply capable of a range of 7-16 Volts.
ME10
CT Corsair (Craig McBurney)
YES
see EE team
We are a multidiscipline team. The ECE team already requested the electricity required (208V 3-phase).
ME12
Legrand
yes
Shop Air, 100PSi compressor. Computer with monitor for motion simulation
ME17
Pratt & Whitney No Y
Strain gage box
ME28
UTC Aerospace Systems
Yes
90 VDC
ME36
Zachry Nuclear Engineering No
Yes (1)
Need water to fill system (either something like a garden hose or bucket)
Follow up on these requirements

11. Demo Day Requirements
Don’t assume your request will automatically be filled – check with Mr. Mealy
5 teams did not provide their summary requirements
You are responsible for a computer and monitor
6 foot table, 2 – 30”x40” poster boards w/ stands
Posters
15”x24” can be printed in ME Lab see Steve White
Larger require outside printer
Adhesive provided

12. Your Priorities for Senior Design
1. Execute your project
Achieve results
Meet the project objectives
2. Design and construct a great display –May 1
Don’t embarrass yourself, sponsor, department
Be proud of your work
3. Complete the final report
Document your work
Provide a legacy for future teams

16. Remember
Effort is necessary BUT You are judged on results

17. Experiment Status 2/18

18. February 18, 2015 Syllabus Brochure Material Experiment Status
Brian Montanari – President Habco

19. Oral 3 Format Title Slide – 1 slide name, teams faculty sponsor, logos
2. Problem Statement – what are you being asked to do/deliver
Define the project – 1 slide
3. Analysis Results to date – 3-4 slides
A. CAD Models (by itself is not enough)
B. Analyses Results (Ansys or other)
meshes (critical locations)
boundary conditions
pictures, models and results (graphs/figures)
C. FBDs, hand calculations - Results
D. Comparison to test data

20. Oral 3 Format including initial testing to help with final rig design
4. Test rig or experiment – 2 -3 slides
A. design/schematic – how does this address the problem
sizing of components – power required, sizing….
B. Models/CAD drawings, pictures, videos….
C. Instrumentation –
what is being measured, what is range and accuracy
required
D. Your test Matrix (DOE if applicable) – range of variables be tested
E. Test results to date – comparison with analytical predictions
including initial testing to help with final rig design

21. Results Example – Team 25

22. Oral 3 Format Project Schedule –now to completion
6. Your risk analysis –
mitigation for highest risks

23. Peer Assessment – Last Slide
7. Peer Assessment - clicker
Team is executing to plan (schedule
Presented results look encouraging
High probability they will meet the project objectives
B. Team is having some problems in executing ,but
They know the issues and have a plan to recover.
Moderate probability they will meet project objectives.
C. Team is having serious problems in executing.
No plan to recover
Low probability they will meet project objectives

24. For the Oral Report Presentation on a flash drive/other
ONE hard color copy of presentation (Stapled)
Into team folder