Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Correct Site Correct Patient Correct Procedure Documentation Audit

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Correct Site Correct Patient Correct Procedure Documentation Audit"— Presentation transcript:

1 Correct Site Correct Patient Correct Procedure Documentation Audit
Team Membership Paula Hindle, RN, MSN Mary Altier RN, MSN Vice President Chief Nurse Executive Nursing Quality Specialist Peggy Vorrier RN, MS Gigi Marinakos-Trulis Administrative Director Surgical Services Data Analyst Jo Quetsch RN MA-OM Jeri Katsaros RN, BSN Manager Operating Room Manager Same Day Surgery/PAR

2 Department Membership
Main Operating Room Labor and Delivery Newborn Nursery BICU, NICU, PICU 4SICU, 2WICU, 2CCU Special Procedures Cardiographics EP Lab Cardiac Cath Lab Pulmonary Function Lab Nuclear Medicine Ultrasound GI Lab Breast Imaging Dermatology Pain Clinic ENT Clinic Oak Brook Terrace 1 LOC Surgery Center Ambulatory Surgery Center Cancer Center Oral Health Center

3 Opportunity Statement
There is an opportunity at LUHS to assure compliance with the 2005 National Patient Safety Goal of the Universal Protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure and wrong patient surgery. Project goal: Improve the submission and documentation rates for compliance with proper consents, site verification and time-out procedures.

4 Most Likely Causes Identified
Knowledge deficit regarding use of tool Knowledge deficit regarding proper submission of form Lack of understanding of Universal Protocol Which surgeries/procedures are included in protocol Which surgeries/procedures require site marking Number of personnel required for a “time-out”

5 Solutions Implemented
Education sessions for key stakeholders regarding use of tool Random sampling of verification checklists performed quarterly: 4th quarter th quarter 2005 Quarterly reports to clinical departments

6 Data Analysis 9 data collection periods since inception
26-29 departments submitted forms for audits Total sheets audited N=13,696 Data elements measured: Consents signed, site marked, time-out completed.

7 Form Submissions The number of departments submitting forms for audit has increased by 77% since project inception.

8 Consents Properly Documented
Definition: Percent of appropriate documentation demonstrating the department is in compliance with the Operative and Invasive Procedure Verification policy. (# ) Data Source: Original data extracted from LUHS Site Verification Sheets by RN and Data Analyst. Analysis: LUHS performance is stable with a mean of 95%.

9 Site Verification Properly Documented
Definition: Percent of appropriate documentation demonstrating the department is in compliance with the Operative and Invasive Procedure Verification policy. (# ) Data Source: Original data extracted from LUHS Site Verification Sheets by RN and Data Analyst. Analysis: LUHS mean performance is at 81%. Recent month data demonstrates improvement.

10 Time Outs Properly Documented
Definition: Percent of appropriate documentation demonstrating the department is in compliance with the Operative and Invasive Procedure Verification policy. (# ) Data Source: Original data extracted from LUMC Site Verification Sheets by RN and Data Analyst. Analysis: LUHS performance is stable with a mean of 95%.

11 Next Steps Revision of form: 1st Quarter 2006 with implementation targeted for 3rd quarter 2006 collection period Revision of Operative procedure policy: Quarter In-service to all key stakeholders: both inpatient and Ambulatory sites regarding revised form/policy Monitor departments for compliance Quarterly reports to clinical departments provide feedback on performance


Download ppt "Correct Site Correct Patient Correct Procedure Documentation Audit"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google