Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Penetrant Testing
2
Penetrant Properties Surface Tension and Wetting ability
P = 2S Cos W A good penetrant should have high surface tension and a small contact angle
3
Affects the rate at which penetrant enters a defect
Viscosity Affects the rate at which penetrant enters a defect The more viscous the penetrant the slower it enter openings OIL GREASE
4
PENSKE MARTEN CLOSED CUP TEST
Flash Point Temperature recorded Flash point The minimum temperature at which liquid will gives off enough vapour which will flash with an application of small flame sparkplug thermometer vapour Closed container Liquid under test water PENSKE MARTEN CLOSED CUP TEST Heat
5
Typical Penetrant Tank
Penetrant Properties Specific Gravity Penetrant has Lower SG than water : 0.9 Reason: If penetrant used in tank water will be on the bottom Typical Penetrant Tank Water Penetrant Wire mesh Contaminants Drainage
6
Specific Gravity Checked using a HYDROMETER Water Penetrant Scales
Balast / weight Water Penetrant
7
Penetrant Line
8
Penetrant Properties Volatility
High volatility = High rate of evaporation A good penetrant has low volatility
9
Penetrant Properties Chemical inertness
Maximum levels for sulphur, halogens and sodium are specified Sulphur and halogens may cause stress corrosion or intergranullar corrosion Halogens: Very reactive elements. Examples: Chlorine Iodine Bromine Fluorine
10
Penetrant Properties Solubility
Penetrant must hold sufficient dye in solution at ambient or high temperatures Solvent Ability Must be able to remove penetrant from specimen
11
Penetrant Properties Tolerance to Contaminants Health Hazard Toxicity
Odour Skin contact Availability and Cost
12
System classification
PENETRANT Colour contrast Fluorescent Dual REMOVAL Water washable Solvent Post emulsifiable
13
Penetrant Systems PENETRANT Colour contrast Fluorescent Dual REMOVAL
Solvent Water washable Post emulsifiable DEVELOPERS Dry powder Aqueous Non-Aqueous
14
Control Checks Overall system performance
15
Overall System Performance
Quench cracked aluminium alloy block Chromium plated cracked test panel Cracked test piece
16
ARB BLOCK- Aeronautical Registration Board Block
COMPARATOR BLOCK ARB BLOCK- Aeronautical Registration Board Block Two sided aluminum block which been quenched – to produce thermal cracks May be used to check/compare performance of penetrant chemicals (penetrant, emulsifier, developer)
17
Two different penetrant applied on each section of block
How to use the ARB block Two different penetrant applied on each section of block NEW OLD The excess penetrant is removed and developer applied Indication are observed Now process is repeat with the penetrant applied to different section OLD NEW OLD PENETRANT IS WEAK OLD PENETRANT IS OK
18
TAM panel or SHERWIN panel
CHROMIUM PLATED BLOCK TAM panel or SHERWIN panel Section for checking effectiveness of cleaning Section for checking sensitivity Cleaning not effective Less sensitive
19
Control Checks Overall system performance
Water wash temperature and pressure Colour intensity Penetrant remover Developer UV lamp output UV monitor Water tolerance
20
Control Checks - Frequency
Daily Weekly Monthly Annual Overall system performance Water wash temperature and pressure Colour intensity Penetrant remover Developer UV lamp output UV monitor Water tolerance
21
Maintenance Checks Tank levels Equipment cleanliness
Airline cleanliness Processing units UV lamp maintenance Clean tanks
22
Penetrant Systems PENETRANT Colour contrast Fluorescent Dual REMOVAL
Solvent Water washable Post emulsifiable DEVELOPERS Dry powder Aqueous Non-Aqueous
23
BS EN 571 Removal Penetrant Type I Fluorescent Method A Water
Type II Colour contrast Type III Dual Method A Water Method B Lipophilic Emulsifier Method C Solvent Method D Hydrophilic Method E Water and solvent
24
BS EN 571 Removal Developer Form a Dry Method A Water
Form b Water soluble Form c Water suspendable Form d Solvent based Form e Peelable Method A Water Method B Lipophilic Emulsifier Method C Solvent Method D Hydrophilic Method E Water and solvent
25
BS EN 571 Fluorescent Solvent removable Solvent based developer Type I
Method C Form d
26
Mil-L-25135 Group I Solvent removed,Visible
Group II Post emulsified,Visible Group III Water washable,Visible Group IV Water washable,Fluorescent(L) Group V Post emulsified,Fluorescent(M) Group VI Post emulsified,Fluorescent(H) Group VII Solvent removed,Fluorescent
27
Mil-L-6866 Type I Fluorescent Type II Visible Method A Water
Method B Post emulsifiable Method C Solvent Type II Visible Method A Water Method B Post emulsifiable Method C Solvent
28
Selection of System Nature of discontinuities (size and type)
Geometry and intricacy Surface condition Component material Size and position Equipment and expertise available Cost Number of components to be tested
29
Selection of System Inspection of a large number of threaded components What method will you select and why ? Fluorescent water washable with dry powder developer Fluorescent for mass inspections Water washable more suited than solvents to batch inspections Post emulsifiable difficult to remove from threads
30
Selection of System Inspection of turbine blades for fatigue cracks
What method will you select and why ? Fluorescent post emulsifiable with non-aqueous developer Fluorescent more sensitive than colour contrast Post emulsifiable more sensitive than water washable Non-aqueous developer most sensitive
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.