Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrianna Bradley Modified over 6 years ago
1
Assignment of Cataloging Staff Levels at Penn State: a Case Study
Presenter: Rebecca L. Mugridge
2
Cataloging Services 6 self-directed format-based work teams
38 employees including: Department Head Assistant Department Head 8 librarians 1 professional staff 27 support staff
3
Cataloging Services’ portfolio
Centralized processing for 21 of 24 campuses (law and medical libraries still have own technical services departments, as does the Pennsylvania College of Technology) Recently became responsible for government documents processing Manages ad hoc batch loading
4
Cooperative cataloging timeline
1995 OCLC enhance (maps) 2001 NACO independence personal names 2002 NACO independence corporate names 2005 NACO independence series 2006 OCLC enhance (monographs) 2007 OCLC enhance (visual materials) 2007 CONSER
5
Penn State’s Cataloging Services Organizational Chart
6
Teams Monographs (9 staff) Special Collections (4 staff (2.2 FTE))
Maps (3 staff, (2 FTE)) Music/AV (3 staff) CatMarking Team (4 staff) Serials (5 staff (4.63 FTE))
7
Virtual teams Authority Control Government Documents Metadata
8
Professional positions
Monographs Cat’g/Auth Cntl Librarian Music/AV Cataloging Librarian Special Collections Cat’g Librarian Manuscripts Cataloging Librarian Metadata Librarian Maps Cataloging Librarian Serials Cataloging Librarian Asian Studies Librarian (60%)
9
Staff Position Grade Levels
Grade 16 (4 staff) Grade 17 (5 staff) Grade 18 (6 staff) Grade 19 (2 staff) Grade 20 (6 staff) Grade 22 (1 staff)
10
Grade 16 High volume Copy cataloging Theses or template cataloging
Cataloging maintenance activities
11
Grade 17 Complex copy cataloging Non-book formats
Potential for OCLC enhance participation
12
Grade 18 Primarily complex copy cataloging Some original cataloging
NACO participation CONSER participation OCLC enhance participation
13
Grade 19 Primarily complex copy cataloging Some original cataloging
NACO participation CONSER participation OCLC enhance participation Training and revising
14
Grade 20 Primarily original cataloging Some complex copy cataloging
NACO participation CONSER participation OCLC Enhance participation Training and revising
15
Grade 22 Original cataloging Metadata support
Manages ad hoc batch loading projects
16
Conclusion Level of cataloging and format of material does influence the level of personnel assigned to perform the work at PSU Perhaps this is due more to the size of the staff rather than type of library. Size gives us: Flexibility Ability to differentiate types of work
17
For more information, feel free to contact:
Rebecca L. Mugridge Head, Cataloging and Metadata Services The Pennsylvania State University Libraries 126 Paterno Library University Park PA 16802 Phone: Fax:
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.