Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Operations Management Short-Term Scheduling Chapter 15

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Operations Management Short-Term Scheduling Chapter 15"— Presentation transcript:

1 Operations Management Short-Term Scheduling Chapter 15
Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

2 Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter, you should be able to : Identify or Define: Gantt charts Assignment method Sequencing rules Johnson’s rules Bottlenecks Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

3 Learning Objectives - continued
When you complete this chapter, you should be able to : Describe or Explain: Scheduling Sequencing Shop loading Theory of constraints Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

4 Strategic Implications of Short-Term Scheduling
By scheduling effectively, companies use assets more effectively and create greater capacity per dollar invested, which, in turn, lowers cost This added capacity and related flexibility provides faster delivery and therefore better customer service Good scheduling is a competitive advantage which contributes to dependable delivery You might stress to students that scheduling is what the end-customer actually sees. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

5 Short-Term Scheduling
Deals with timing of operations Short run focus: Hourly, daily, weekly Types Today Due Date B E Forward Scheduling Backward Scheduling Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

6 Short-Term Scheduling Examples
© T/Maker Co. Hospital Outpatient treatments Operating rooms University Instructors Classrooms Factory Production Purchases Students should be asked to provide additional examples. They should also be asked to identify any “unusual circumstances” which might pertain to their examples. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

7 Scheduling Decisions Organization Managers Must Schedule
Operating room use Patient admission Nursing, security, maintenance staffs Outpatient treatments Classrooms and audiovisual equipment Student and instructor schedules Graduate and undergraduate courses Production of goods Purchase of materials Workers Mount Sinai Hospital Indiana University Lockheed-Martin Factory Here you might ask students to identify the scheduling decisions for a business with which they are familiar. McDonalds, grocery store, and doctor’s office are useful examples. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

8 Scheduling Decisions Organization Managers Must Schedule
Chefs, waiters,bartenders Delivery of fresh foods Entertainers Opening of dining areas Maintenance of aircraft Departure timetables Flight crews, catering, gate, and ticketing personnel Hard Rock Cafe Delta Airlines Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

9 Capacity Planning, Aggregate Scheduling, Master Schedule, and Short-Term Scheduling
1. Facility size 2. Equipment procurement Long-term Aggregate Scheduling 1. Facility utilization 2. Personnel needs 3. Subcontracting Intermediate-term Master Schedule 1. MRP 2. Disaggregation of master plan Intermediate-term Students should be asked to identify three decisions at each level. Short-term Scheduling 1. Work center loading 2. Job sequencing Short-term Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

10 Forward and Backward Scheduling
Forward scheduling: begins the schedule as soon as the requirements are known jobs performed to customer order schedule can be accomplished even if due date is missed often causes buildup of WIP Backward scheduling: begins with the due date of the final operation; schedules jobs in reverse order used in many manufacturing environments, catering, scheduling surgery Students should be asked to consider how, using either process, they would modify the schedule when (a) an order is cancelled, (b) a priority, rush order is accepted, or (c) a delay is encountered. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

11 The Goals of Short-Term Scheduling
Minimize completion time Maximize utilization (make effective use of personnel and equipment) Minimize WIP inventory (keep inventory levels low) Minimize customer wait time While we would like to minimize customer wait time, an alternate goal might be to make customer wait time consistent - we could always ask them to come later. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

12 Choosing a Scheduling Method
Qualitative factors Number and variety of jobs Complexity of jobs Nature of operations Quantitative criteria Average completion time Utilization (% of time facility is used) WIP inventory (average # jobs in system) Customer waiting time (average lateness) Ask students to identify at least one example of a scheduling based on qualitative factors, and one one quantitative factors. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

13 Process-Focused Work Centers
High variety, low volume systems Products made to order Products need different materials and processing Complex production planning and control Production planning aspects Shop loading Job sequencing Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

14 Types of Planning Files
Item master file - contains information about each component the firm produces or purchases Routing file - indicates each component’s flow through the shop Work-center master file - contains information about the work center such as capacity and efficiency It is helpful to discuss the purpose of each of the planning files. What is the data used for? Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

15 Process-Focused Planning System
Aggregate Forecast & Resource Production Firm Orders Availability Planning Material Master Requirements Production Planning Scheduling No, modify CRP, MRP, or MPS It is helpful to actually walk the students through the steps illustrated in this slide. Capacity Shop Requirements Realistic? Floor Yes Planning Schedules Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

16 Input-Output Control Week Ending 6/6 6/13 6/20 6/27 7/4 7/11
Planned input 280 Actual input 270 250 285 Cumulative Deviation -10 -40 -35 Planned Output 320 Actual Output -50 -100 -150 -200 Cumulative Change in Backlog -20 -+5 Explanation: 270 input, 270 output, implies 0 change Explanation: 250 input, 270 output implies –20 change (20 standard hours less in the work center) Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

17 Gantt Load Chart Shows relative workload in facility Disadvantages
Does not account for unexpected events Must be updated regularly Work Center M T W Th F Metal Works Job 349 Job 350 Mechanical Job D Job G Electronics Job B Job H Painting Job C Job E Job I A characteristic of most of our project management and schedule management tools is that they require management attention for updating on a regular basis. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

18 Gantt Load Chart for Week of March 6
Shows relative workload in facility Disadvantages Does not account for unexpected events Must be updated regularly Day Work Center Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Metalworks Job 349 Job 350 Mechanical Job 406 Electronics Job 408 Painting Job 295 Center not available (for example, maintenance time, repairs, shortages) Processing Unscheduled Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

19 Gantt Scheduling Chart
Start of an activity Scheduled activity time allowed Point in time when chart is reviewed S T W F Day Job Job A Job B Job C Maintenance Now End of an activity Actual work progress Non-production time Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

20 Assignment Method Assigns tasks or jobs to resources
Type of linear programming model Objective Minimize total cost, time etc. Constraints 1 job per resource (e.g., machine) 1 resource (e.g., machine) per job Students should be asked to consider what other assumptions must be made when using the assignment model for job scheduling. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

21 Assignment Method – Type Setter Example
Job A B C R-34 $11 $14 $ 6 S-66 $ 8 $10 T-50 $9 $12 $7 Initial set-up Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

22 Empat Langkah Assignment
Kurangi setiap angka pada satu baris dengan angka yg terkecil, dan demikian juga untuk kolom. Hasil yg diperoleh adalah opportunity cost. Buat garis lurus vertikal dan horisontal untuk menutup angka nol dalam tabel. Jika jumlah garis lurus tsb telah sama dengan jumlah baris/kolom, maka penugasan telah optimal (lanjutkan ke langkah 4). Namun, jika belum (lanjutkan ke langkah 3). Kurangkan dg angka paling kecil untuk angka yg tidak tertutup garis sampai diperoleh nol. Kemudian kembali ke langkah 2 untuk memperoleh penugasan optimal. Tambahkan dengan angka yang sama pada angka pada perpotongan garis. Penugasan optimal akan berada pada lokasi nol. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

23 Step 1a & 1b Step 1a Step 1b Typesetter Job A B C R-34 5 8 S-66 2 3
S-66 2 3 T-50 Typesetter Job A B C R-34 5 6 S-66 3 T-50 2 Step 1a Step 1b Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

24 Step 2 Smallest uncovered number Typesetter Job A B C R-34 5 6 S-66 3
S-66 3 T-50 2 Smallest uncovered number Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

25 Step 3 Make assignments Typesetter Job A B C R-34 3 4 S-66 5 T-50 1
S-66 5 T-50 1 Make assignments Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

26 Sequencing Challenge Order release Job Packet Job XYZ
Which job do I run next? Dispatch List Order Part Due Qty XYZ ABC Production Control Production Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

27 Sequencing Specifies order jobs will be worked Sequencing rules
First come, first served (FCFS) Shortest processing time (SPT) Earliest due date (EDD) Longest processing time (LPT) Critical ratio (CR) Johnson’s rule The next seven slides provide additional discussion of these rules. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

28 Priority Rules for Dispatching Jobs
First come, first served The first job to arrive at a work center is processed first Earliest due date The job with the earliest due date is processed first Shortest processing time The job with the shortest processing time is processed first Longest processing time The job with the longest processing time is processed first Critical ratio The ratio of time remaining to required work time remaining is calculated, and jobs are scheduled in order of increasing ratio. FCFS EDD SPT LPT CR Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

29 First Come, First Served Rule
Process first job to arrive at a work center first Average performance on most scheduling criteria Appears ‘fair’ & reasonable to customers Important for service organizations Example: Restaurants Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

30 Shortest Processing Time Rule
Process job with shortest processing time first. Usually best at minimizing job flow and minimizing the number of jobs in the system Major disadvantage is that long jobs may be continuously pushed back in the queue. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

31 Longest Processing Time Rule
Process job with longest processing time first. Usually the least effective method of sequencing. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

32 Earliest Due Date Rule Process job with earliest due date first
Widely used by many companies If due dates important If MRP used Due dates updated by each MRP run Performs poorly on many scheduling criteria Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

33 Critical Ratio (CR) Ratio of time remaining to work time remaining
= Work days remaining Due date - Today' s date = Work (lead ) time remaining Process job with smallest CR first Performs well on average lateness Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

34 Advantages of the Critical Ratio Scheduling Rule
Use of the critical ratio can help to: determine the status of a specific job establish a relative priority among jobs on a common basis relate both stock and make-to-order jobs on a common basis adjust priorities and revise schedules automatically for changes in both demand and job progress dynamically track job progress and location Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

35 Criteria to Evaluate Priority Rules
You might point out (even though you have probably noted it before) that ratings or rankings of the different scheduling rules will differ depending upon the criteria used. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

36 Job Sequencing Example
Job Work Processing time in days Job Due Date (day) A 6 8 B 2 C 18 D 3 15 E 9 23 Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

37 FCFS Parameter Value Average completion time 15.4 days Utilization
36.4% Average number of jobs in the system 2.75 jobs Average job lateness 2.2 days Sequence A B C D E Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

38 SPT Parameter Value Average completion time 13 days Utilization 43.1%
Average number of jobs in the system 2.32 jobs Average job lateness 1.8 days Sequence B D A C E Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

39 EDD Parameter Value Average completion time 13.6 days Utilization
41.2% Average number of jobs in the system 2.43 jobs Average job lateness 1.2 days Sequence B A D C E Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

40 LPT Parameter Value Average completion time 20.6 days Utilization
27.2% Average number of jobs in the system 3.68 jobs Average job lateness 9.6 days Sequence E C A D B Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

41 Summary Rule Average Completion Time (days) Utilization (%)
Average Number of Jobs in the System Average Lateness (Days) FCFS 15.4 36.4 2.75 2.2 SPT 13.0 43.1 2.32 1.8 EDD 13.6 41.2 2.43 1.2 LPT 20.6 27.2 3.68 9.6 Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

42 Processing time in days
Critical Ratio (CR) Job Job Work Processing time in days Job Due Date (day) Critical Ratio A 6 8 0.75 B 2 0.33 C 18 0.44 D 3 15 0.20 E 9 23 0.39 Sequence A C E B D Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

43 Johnson’s Rule Used to sequence N jobs through 2 machines in the same order © 1995 Corel Corp. Saw Drill Job A Job B Job C Jobs (N = 3) Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

44 Johnson's Rule - Scheduling N Jobs on Two Machines
All jobs are to be listed, and the time each requires on a machine shown. Select the job with the shortest activity time. If the shortest time lies with the first machine, the job is scheduled first; if with the second machine, the job is scheduled last. Once a job is scheduled, eliminate it. Apply steps 2-3 to the remaining jobs, working toward the center of the sequence. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

45 Johnson’s Rule Steps 2 1 List jobs & activity times Select job with
shortest time Machine? Schedule FIRST LAST Eliminate job from list Jobs left? Break arbitrarily Ties? Yes 1 2 Stop No Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

46 Johnson’s Rule - Example
Job Work Center 1 (Drill Press) Work Center 2 (Lathe) A 5 2 B 3 6 C 8 4 D 10 7 E 12 Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

47 Johnson’s Rule - Example
Step 1 A Step 2 B A Step 3 B C A Step 4 B D C A Step 5 B E D C A Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

48 Graphical Depiction of Job Flow
Work center 1 Work center 2 Time => B E D C A B E D C A = Idle = Job completed Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

49 Limitations of Rule-Based Dispatching Systems
Scheduling is dynamic; therefore, rules need to be revised to adjust to changes in process, equipment, product mix, etc. Rules do not look upstream or downstream; idle resources and bottleneck resources in other departments may not be recognized Rules do not look beyond due dates You might point out to students that this is another case of models which are insufficiently robust to handle all factors. Ask students to consider how these limitations might be overcome. (Finite scheduling?) What is the role of information technology? Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

50 Finite Scheduling System
Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

51 Theory of Constraints Deals with factors limiting company’s ability to achieve goals Types of constraints Physical Example: Machines, raw materials Non-physical Example: Morale, training Limits throughput in operations Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

52 Theory of Constraints A Five Step Process
Identify the constraints Develop a plan for overcoming the identified constraints Focus resources on accomplishing the constraints identified in step 2 Reduce the effects of the constraints by off-loading work or by expanding capability Once one set of constraints is overcome, return to the first step and identify new constraints Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

53 Bottleneck Work Centers
Bottleneck work centers have less capacity than prior or following work centers They limit production output © 1995 Corel Corp. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

54 Techniques for Dealing With Bottlenecks
Increase the capacity of the constraint Ensure well-trained and cross-trained employees are available to operate and maintain the work center causing the constraint Develop alternate routings, processing procedures, or subcontractors Move inspections and tests to a position just before the constraint Schedule throughput to match the capacity of the bottleneck Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

55 The 10 Commandments for Correct Scheduling
Utilization of a non-bottleneck resource is determined not by its own capacity but by some other constraint in the system Activating a resource is not synonymous with utilizing a resource An hour lost at a bottleneck is an hour lost of the whole system An hour saved at a non-bottleneck is a mirage The transfer batch may not, and many times should not, be equal to the process batch Discussion should include not only a definition of the commandment but an explanation of how it impacts the production system. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

56 The 10 Commandments for Correct Scheduling
The amount processed should be verifiable and not fixed Capacity and priority need to be considered simultaneously, not sequentially Damage from unforeseen problems can be isolated and minimized Plant capacity should not be balanced The sum of the local optimums is not equal to the global optimum Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

57 Repetitive Manufacturing - Advantages of Level Material Use
Lower inventory levels, releasing capital for other uses Faster product throughput Improved component quality and hence improved product quality Reduced floor space requirements Improved communication among employees because they are closer together Smoother production process because large lots have not “hidden” the problems Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

58 Scheduling for Services
Appointment systems - doctor’s office Reservations systems - restaurant, car rental First come, first served - deli Most critical first - hospital trauma room Students should be asked to consider what special problems arise in scheduling services. Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

59 Cyclical Scheduling Plan a schedule equal in weeks to the number of people being scheduled Determine how many of each of the least desirable off-shifts must be covered each week Begin the schedule for one worker by scheduling the days off during the planning cycle (at a rate of 2 days per week on average) Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J

60 Cyclical Scheduling - Continued
Assign off-shifts for the first worker Repeat this pattern for each other worker, but offset by one week from the previous Allow each worker to pick his/her “slot” or “line” in order of seniority Mandate that any changes from the chosen schedule are strictly between the personnel wanting to switch Transparency Masters to accompany Heizer/Render – Principles of Operations Management, 5e, and Operations Management, 7e © 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J


Download ppt "Operations Management Short-Term Scheduling Chapter 15"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google