Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Beef Judging ANS4615
2
Beef Judging Key to beef judging requires accurate grading skills
Successful evaluation of quality and yield grading is essential Generally, carcasses ranked on value
3
Beef Carcasses - emphasis
Challenge is weighing relative differences quality and cutability Judges should recognize optimum levels of quality and cutability and understand how to balance traits Normally prefer Choice YG 3.5 or better carcasses over Select YG 1’s or 2’s However, Select carcasses will/can place over Choice if the Choice carcass is YG 3.6 or higher
4
Beef Carcass-common decisions
Common class: 1 = Select YG 1 or 2 1 = Choice YG 4 2 = Choice YG 1’s or 2’s Select carcass places over YG 4 in the bottom pair due to superior cutability Top pair Choice carcasses are sorted based on subtle differences in cutability and or quality
5
Beef Carcass-common decisions
Strict cutability class containing all Choice or all Select Quality class usually contains pairs similar in cutability but different in quality Additional scenarios Trimness differences with similar muscling Muscling differences with similar trimness Fat, heavy muscled carcass versus trim, thinly muscled carcass
6
Beef Carcass-common decisions
Advanced maturity grades (C,D,E) are not utilized in beef carcass classes B maturity may be included with A maturity classes B maturity with Slight or Small marbling is USDA Standard and should be considered in the bottom pair
7
Terminology Trimness Ribeye
Lower Rib Round Sirloin Short loin Loin edge Rib Chuck Brisket KPH Cod/udder Muscling Ribeye Round Sirloin Loin Rib Chuck Quality Marbling, color Texture, firmness
9
Beef Wholesale Cuts The continued use of boxed beef by the industry dictates that students master the ability to critically evaluate primal and subprimal cuts of beef Classes in intercollegiate judging: Rounds, Ribs, Full loins, Short loins
10
Beef Rounds - emphasis Placed on trimness first then muscling
Quality does not play a major role in ranking Quality may be used to break pairs when cutability is near identical
11
Beef Rounds-common situations
Similar in trimness and placed on muscling Similar in muscling, placed on trimness A combination of trimness and muscling
12
Terminology Trimness Muscling Quality Round face Rump face Cushion
Center section Heel Cod Flank edge Pelvic fat Muscling Rump face Knuckle face Cushion Center section Heel Shank Quality Marbling, color, Texture, firmness
14
Beef Rib emphasis Generally, placed on value
However, no lower palatability endmeats (Rounds or Chucks) Quality is very important and is emphasized heavily Ribs with advanced maturity and those grading USDA Standard should be considered in bottom pairs
15
Beef Ribs– common situations
A common class 1 = Select YG 1 or 2 1 = Choice YG 4 2 = Choice YG 1 or 2’s Most instances the Select places over the Choice YG 4 in the bottom pair and the top pair is sorted on subtle differences in cutability or quality
16
Beef Ribs– common situations
Strict cutability class containing all Choice or all Select Quality class usually contains pairs similar in cutability but different in quality Additional scenarios Trimness differences with similar muscling Muscling differences with similar trimness Fat, muscular carcass versus trim, thinly muscled carcass
17
Terminology Muscling Quality Trimness Ribeye Blade face Back
Marbling, color Texture, firmness Trimness Ribeye Lower rib Blade face Back Rib ends Seam
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.