1. Chapter 54 Community Ecology
A biological community is an assemblage of populations of various species living close enough for potential interaction

2. Concept 54.1: Community interactions are classified by whether they help, harm, or have no effect on the species involved
Ecologists call relationships between species in a community interspecific interactions
Examples are competition, predation, herbivory, symbiosis (parasitism, mutualism, and commensalism), and facilitation
Interspecific interactions can affect the survival and reproduction of each species, and the effects can be summarized as positive (+), negative (–), or no effect (0)
Interspecific competition (–/– interaction) occurs when species compete for a resource in short supply
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 2

3. Ecological Niches and Natural Selection
The total of a species’ use of biotic and abiotic resources is called the species’ ecological niche
An ecological niche can also be thought of as an organism’s ecological role
Ecologically similar species can coexist in a community if there are one or more significant differences in their niches
Strong competition can lead to competitive exclusion, local elimination of a competing species
The competitive exclusion principle states that two species competing for the same limiting resources cannot coexist in the same place
Resource partitioning is differentiation of ecological niches, enabling similar species to coexist in a community
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 3

4. Spacial partioning A. distichus perches on fence posts and other
Figure 54.2
A. distichus perches on
fence posts and other
sunny surfaces.
A. insolitus usually
perches on shady
branches.
A. ricordii
Spacial partioning
Figure 54.2 Resource partitioning among Dominican Republic lizards.
A. insolitus
A. aliniger
A. christophei
A. distichus
A. cybotes
A. etheridgei 4

5. A species’ fundamental niche is the niche potentially occupied by that species
A species’ realized niche is the niche actually occupied by that species
As a result of competition, a species’ fundamental niche may differ from its realized niche
For example, the presence of one barnacle species limits the realized niche of another species
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 5

6. EXPERIMENT High tide Chthamalus Chthamalus Balanus realized niche
Figure 54.3
EXPERIMENT
High tide
Chthamalus
Balanus
Chthamalus
realized niche
Balanus
realized niche
Ocean
Low tide
RESULTS
High tide
Figure 54.3 Inquiry: Can a species’ niche be influenced by interspecific competition?
Chthamalus
fundamental niche
Ocean
Low tide 6

7. Both species are normally nocturnal (active during the night)
The common spiny mouse and the golden spiny mouse show temporal partitioning of their niches
Both species are normally nocturnal (active during the night)
Where they coexist, the golden spiny mouse becomes diurnal (active during the day)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 7

8. Predators, Prey, and Defense
Predation (+/– interaction) refers to interaction where one species, the predator, kills and eats the other, the prey
Some feeding adaptations of predators are claws, teeth, fangs, stingers, and poison
Prey display various defensive adaptations
Behavioral defenses include hiding, fleeing, forming herds or schools, self-defense, and alarm calls
Animals also have morphological and physiological defense adaptations
Cryptic coloration, or camouflage, makes prey difficult to spot
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 8

9. Video: Seahorse Camouflage
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 9

10. Müllerian mimicry, two or more unpalatable species resemble each other
Animals with effective chemical defense often exhibit bright warning coloration, called aposematic coloration
Predators are particularly cautious in dealing with prey that display such coloration
In some cases, a prey species may gain significant protection by mimicking the appearance of another species
In Batesian mimicry, a palatable or harmless species mimics an unpalatable or harmful modelIn
Müllerian mimicry, two or more unpalatable species resemble each other
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 10

11. Figure 54.5 Examples of defensive coloration in animals.
(a) Cryptic coloration
(b) Aposematic
coloration
Canyon tree frog
Poison dart frog
(c) Batesian mimicry: A harmless species mimics a harmful one.
(d) Müllerian mimicry: Two unpalatable species
mimic each other.
Hawkmoth
larva
Cuckoo bee
Yellow jacket
Green parrot snake
Figure 54.5 Examples of defensive coloration in animals. 11

12. Herbivory
Herbivory (+/– interaction) refers to an interaction in which an herbivore eats parts of a plant or alga
It has led to evolution of plant mechanical and chemical defenses and adaptations by herbivores
Symbiosis
Symbiosis is a relationship where two or more species live in direct and intimate contact with one another
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 12

13. Mutualistic symbiosis, or mutualism (+/+ interaction),
In parasitism (+/– interaction), one organism, the parasite, derives nourishment from another organism, its host, which is harmed in the process
Parasites that live within the body of their host are called endoparasites
Parasites that live on the external surface of a host are ectoparasites
Mutualistic symbiosis, or mutualism (+/+ interaction),
is an interspecific interaction that benefits both species
A mutualism can be
Obligate, where one species cannot survive without the other
Facultative, where both species can survive alone
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 13

14. (a) Acacia tree and ants (genus Pseudomyrmex)
Figure 54.7
(a) Acacia tree and ants (genus Pseudomyrmex)
Figure 54.7 Mutualism between acacia trees and ants.
(b) Area cleared by ants at the base of an acacia tree 14

15. Commensalism
In commensalism (+/0 interaction), one species benefits and the other is neither harmed nor helped
Commensal interactions are hard to document in nature because any close association likely affects both species
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 15

16. Facilitation (/ or 0/) describes an interaction where one species can have positive effects on another species without direct and intimate contact
For example, lichen makes the soil more hospitable for other plant species
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 16

17. Species diversity of a community is the variety of organisms that make up the community
It has two components: species richness and relative abundance
Species richness is the total number of different species in the community
Relative abundance is the proportion each species represents of the total individuals in the community
Two communities can have the same species richness but a different relative abundance
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 17

18. A B C D Community 1 Community 2 A: 25% B: 25% C: 25% D: 25% A: 80%
Figure 54.10 A B C D
Community 1
Community 2
Figure Which forest is more diverse?
A: 25%
B: 25%
C: 25%
D: 25%
A: 80%
B: 5%
C: 5%
D: 10% 18

19. Communities with higher diversity are
More productive and more stable in their productivity
Better able to withstand and recover from environmental stresses
More resistant to invasive species, organisms that become established outside their native range
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 19

20. Trophic Structure
Trophic structure is the feeding relationships between organisms in a community
Food chains link trophic levels from producers to top carnivores
A food web is a branching food chain with complex trophic interactions
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 20

21. A terrestrial food chain A marine food chain
Figure 54.13
Carnivore
Quaternary
consumers
Carnivore
Carnivore
Tertiary
consumers
Carnivore
Carnivore
Secondary
consumers
Carnivore
Herbivore
Figure Examples of terrestrial and marine food chains.
Primary
consumers
Zooplankton
Plant
Primary
producers
Phytoplankton
A terrestrial food chain
A marine food chain 21

22. Humans Smaller toothed whales Baleen whales Sperm whales Elephant
Figure 54.14
Humans
Smaller
toothed
whales
Baleen
whales
Sperm
whales
Elephant
seals
Crab-
eater
seals
Leopard
seals
Birds
Fishes
Squids
Figure An Antarctic marine food web.
Carniv-
orous
plankton
Euphau-
sids
(krill)
Cope-
pods
Phyto-
plankton 22

23. Species with a Large Impact
Certain species have a very large impact on community structure. Such species are highly abundant or play a pivotal role in community dynamics
Dominant species are those that are most abundant or have the highest biomass
-Dominant species exert powerful control over the occurrence and distribution of other species
-For example, sugar maples have a major impact on shading and soil nutrient availability in eastern North America; this affects the distribution of other plant species
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 23

24. Keystone Species and Ecosystem Engineers
Keystone species exert strong control on a community by their ecological roles, or niches
In contrast to dominant species, they are not necessarily abundant in a community
Field studies of sea stars illustrate their role as a keystone species in intertidal communities
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 24

25. Number of species present
Figure 54.17
EXPERIMENT
RESULTS
Figure Inquiry: Is Pisaster ochraceus a keystone predator? 20 15
With Pisaster (control)
Number of species
present 10
Without Pisaster
(experimental) 5
1963
’64
’65
’66
’67
’68
’69
’70
’71
’72
’73
Year 25

26. Ecosystem engineers (or “foundation species”) cause physical changes in the environment that affect community structure
For example, beaver dams can transform landscapes on a very large scale
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 26

27. Disturbances, species diversity, and composition
Decades ago, most ecologists favored the view that communities are in a state of equilibrium (the equilibrium model)
Recent evidence of change has led to a nonequilibrium model, which describes communities as constantly changing after being buffeted by disturbances
A disturbance is an event that changes a community, removes organisms from it, and alters resource availability
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 27

28. Characterizing Disturbance
A high level of disturbance is the result of a high intensity and high frequency of disturbance
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis suggests that moderate levels of disturbance can foster greater diversity than either high or low levels of disturbance
High levels of disturbance exclude many slow-growing species
Low levels of disturbance allow dominant species to exclude less competitive species
In a New Zealand study, richness of invertebrate taxa was highest in streams with an intermediate intensity of flooding
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 28

29. Index of disturbance intensity (log scale)
Figure 54.20 35 30 25
Number of taxa 20 15
Figure Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. 10
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
Index of disturbance intensity (log scale) 29

30. The Yellowstone forest is an example of a nonequilibrium community
Figure 54.21
The large-scale fire in Yellowstone National Park in demonstrated that communities can often respond very rapidly to a massive disturbance
The Yellowstone forest is an example of a nonequilibrium community
Figure Recovery following a large-scale disturbance.
(a) Soon after fire
(b) One year after fire 30

31. Ecological Succession
Ecological succession is the sequence of community and ecosystem changes after a disturbance
Primary succession occurs where no soil exists when succession begins
Secondary succession begins in an area where soil remains after a disturbance
Succession is the result of changes induced by the vegetation itself
Early-arriving species and later-arriving species may be linked in one of three processes
Early arrivals may facilitate appearance of later species by making the environment favorable
They may inhibit establishment of later species
They may tolerate later species but have no impact on their establishment 31

32. Island Equilibrium Model
Species richness on islands depends on island size, distance from the mainland, immigration, and extinction
The equilibrium model of island biogeography maintains that species richness on an ecological island levels off at a dynamic equilibrium point
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 32

33. (far island) (near island) (far island) (small island) Immigration
Figure 54.27b
(far island)
(small island)
Immigration
Extinction
(large/ near island)
Extinction
Rate of immigration or extinction
(large island)
Immigration
(near island)
(far island)
(small island)
(far island)
Figure The equilibrium model of island biogeography.
Small island
Large island
Number of species on island 33

34. Number of plant species Area of island (hectares)
Figure 54.28
RESULTS
Studies of species richness on the Galápagos Islands support the prediction that species richness increases with island size
400
200
100
Number of plant species
(log scale) 50 25 10
Figure Inquiry: How does species richness relate to area? 5 10
100
103
104
105
106
Area of island (hectares)
(log scale) 34

35. Contrasting views of community structure are the subject of continuing debate.
The interactive hypothesis of community structure depicts a community as an assemblage of closely linked species locked into association by mandatory biotic interactions. The community functions as an integrated unit, as a superorganism.
The individualistic hypothesis of community structure depicts a community as a chance assemblage of species found in the same area because they happen to have similar abiotic requirements for rainfall, temperature, or soil type.
The individualistic hypothesis is generally accepted by plant ecologists. 35

36. Contrasting views of community structure are the subject of continuing debate.
Further debate arises when these ideas are applied to animals.
The rivet model of communities is a reincarnation of the interactive model and suggests that most animal species are associated with particular other species in the community. Reducing or increasing the abundance of one species in a community will affect many other species.
The redundancy model proposes that most animal species in a community are not closely associated with one another. Species operate independently, and an increase or decrease in one species in a community has little effect on other species. In this sense, species in a community are redundant. If a predator disappears, another predatory species will take its place as a consumer of specific prey.
The rivet and redundancy models represent extremes; most communities have some features of each model. 36