Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byErica Carpenter Modified over 6 years ago
1
Data measurement, probability and Spearman’s Rho
Statistics Data measurement, probability and Spearman’s Rho
2
Learning Aims By the end of this session you are going to totally ‘get’ levels of significance and why we do statistical tests!
3
Just a recap …. On your whiteboards.. On your own…
What is the IV? What is the DV? What is a directional hypothesis? What is a non-directional hypothesis? What is the mean? What is the median? What is the mode? What are these 3 tests called? What we manipulate What we measure Prediction – direction Usually based on previous research Prediction – no direction Average Middle value Most common Descriptive statistics
4
Levels of measurement - DV
These are quantitative measures of data which are of extreme importance when conducting statistical tests There are 4 levels of measurement
5
Also known as levels of data
Nominal: Counting into categories, e.g. there are 4 men and 4 women in the room Ordinal: Results are put in order, they are ranked. E.g. we could rank the place that each horse came in a race
6
Levels of measurement Interval: Data is defined as being a specific measure, this can be measured on an instrument, there are equal intervals between each piece of data. E.g. We can record the exact temperature using a thermometer. (can be minus) Ratio: This is like interval data except the scale has a meaningful value of zero. E.g. time and length – YOU DO NPT NEED THIS.. This data can be classed as Interval
7
Why do we need to conduct statistical tests?
Statistical tests tell us the significance of a set of findings- did the IV really effect the DV or were the findings a fluke?! The more significant a finding is the more effect the IV had on the DV
8
Probability: We need to use inferential statistics to tell us if the result that we have found is due to chance or not To establish if our results are reliable we have to look at the probability of a result being due to chance or not The minimum accepted level of probability commonly used in psychology is 5%, this is represented as 0.05 If the level of significance achieved from a test is equal to or less 0.05 than the results are said to be significant This would mean that we are 95% sure that the IV caused the change in the DV
9
Probability: Can be expressed as: A proportion: a 1 in 5 chance. As a percentage: 20% More commonly expressed as a decimal in psychology: 0.2. In psychology: 10%=0.10, 5%=0.05, 1%=0.01 and 0.1%=0.001 To go from % to decimal divide by 100, move decimal place 2 spaces to the left. Remember the more stringent (lower) the level of significance you set the more significant the results are
10
Observed value: Every time you perform a statistical test you get an OBSERVED VALUE This observed value tells you the extent to which your results are valid, you then have to compare this observed value to a table of CRITICAL VALUES to see of your results are significant or not To be significant the observed value should be greater or less than the critical value depending on the type of test Note that there will be a different table of values for different statistical tests
11
Interpreting results:
Usually in psychology if the results are significant it means that the probability of the result being due to chance is 5% or less P<0.05 means the results are significant- so we would accept the experimental hypothesis and reject the null hypothesis
12
Interpreting results:
P is used to represent “the probability that is due to chance” > =means greater than < =means less than ≥ means greater than or equal to ≤ means less than or equal to SO……………… P<0.05 means that the probability that the result is due to chance is less than 5%
13
Type 1 and type 2 errors: These can occur because:
The 5% level of significance has been accepted as it represents a reasonable balance between the chances of making a type 1 or type 2 error These can occur because: Level of probability accepted is either too lenient (too high) or too stringent (too low)
14
Type 1 and type 2 errors Type 1 error: Type 2 error:
Occurs when we conclude that there IS a significant difference when there is NOT This can happen if the accepted level of probability is set TOO LENIENT Significance level set at 20% Type 2 error: Occurs when we reject the experimental hypothesis and accept the null when there IS a difference This can happen if the probability level is TOO STRINGENT Significance level set at 1%
16
Deciding on a statistical test
You must decide the following: Are you trying to find out if your samples are related (correlate) or different? What design you have used- related, non related, matched pairs What level of measurement you have used You can use the following table to help decide:
17
See handout… What test to use? Looking for a difference
Looking for a correlation
18
What test to use? rho Looking for a difference Chi-square Sign Test
LOOKING FOR A CORRELATION Groups will be separate DATA LEVEL INDEPENDENT GROUPS DESIGN REPEATED MEASURES DESIGN NOMINAL Chi-square Sign Test ORDINAL Mann-Whitney U test Wilcoxon test Spearman’s rho INTERVAL OR RATIO Unrelated t test Related t test Pearsons r
19
What test to use? rho Looking for a difference Chi-square Sign Test
LOOKING FOR A CORRELATION Groups will be separate DATA LEVEL INDEPENDENT GROUPS DESIGN REPEATED MEASURES DESIGN NOMINAL Chi-square Sign Test ORDINAL Mann-Whitney U test Wilcoxon test Spearman’s rho INTERVAL OR RATIO Unrelated t test Related t test Pearsons r
20
Test your understanding!
Using your newly found knowledge identify the test that would be suitable for the following: An experiment with nominal data and an independent groups design Ordinal data on both measures in a study to see if two measures are associated An experiment with and independent groups design in which the DV is measured on a ordinal scale A study using a correlational technique in which one measure is interval and the other is ratio. An experiment in which all participants were tested with alcohol and without alcohol on a memory test An experiment in which reaction time was tested using an independent subject design
21
ANSWERS An experiment with nominal data and an independent groups design chi-squared test Ordinal data on both measures in a study to see if two measures are associated Spearman’s rank correlation / Rho An experiment with and independent groups design in which the DV is measured on a Ordinal scale Mann-Whitney U test A study using a correlation technique in which one measure is interval and the other is ratio Pearsons r An experiment in which all participants were tested with alcohol and without alcohol on a memory test Wilcoxon’s T test An experiment in which reaction time was tested using an independent subject design Unrelated T-Test
22
PRACTICAL: What goes in a results section?
Measure of central tendency (mean) Measure of dispersion (range) Graph (all elements need to be present!) Statistical test Raw data goes in your Appendix
23
Our example for today…. You should relate each of these steps to your practical
Aim: A psychologist is investigating the relationship between sleep and cognitive function. Hypothesis is that “There will be a positive relationship between hours of sleep the night before a test and the score on the test”. What would her null hypothesis be? What kind of hypothesis is this?
24
Our raw data for today: Participant Hours of sleep Test score (%) A 3
Appendix Participant Hours of sleep Test score (%) A 3 12 B 6 71 C 9 83 D 4 46 E 5 38 F 13 94 G 10 100 H 1 15 I 8 32 J 87 Which stats test do you think we’ll be using? What type of data is this? What is the research design?
25
First things first… Produce a graph to visually present this information What does your graph suggest about the relationship between these two variables? You should have this already for your practical! Participant Hours of sleep Test score (%) A 3 12 B 6 71 C 9 83 D 4 46 E 5 38 F 13 94 G 10 100 H 1 15 I 8 32 J 87 Scattergraph required
27
Measures of central tendency and dispersion
You then need to calculate the mean for both sets of data, and the range What can you conclude from these calculations? Again you should have this already for your practical! Hours of sleep Test score (%) Mean Range
28
Spearman’s Rho Using your colourful, informative table, why would we use this test? A correlation / relationship ordinal data
29
Spearman’s Rho Used to check for statistical significance between two variables To calculate the correlation coefficient, you need values for two different variables (e.g. hours of revision and average test scores, or ugliness and fear) ! You do not need to calculate the test by hand… but you need to understand what the process is
30
Step Rank the scores for both variables from lowest to highest
Additional info Step Rank the scores for both variables from lowest to highest Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) A 3 12 B 6 71 C 9 83 D 4 46 E 5 38 F 13 94 G 10 100 H 1 15 I 8 32 J 87
31
Step Rank the scores for both variables from lowest to highest
Additional info Step Rank the scores for both variables from lowest to highest Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) A 3 2 12 1 B 6 5 71 C 9 7 83 D 4 46 E 38 F 13 10 94 G 8 100 H 15 I 32 J 87
32
Step Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) d A 3 2 12 1 B 6 5
Additional info Now calculate the difference (d) in ranks for each student (hours of sleep – test score = d) Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) d A 3 2 12 1 B 6 5 71 C 9 7 83 D 4 46 E 38 F 13 10 94 G 8 100 H 15 I 32 J 87
33
Additional info Step Now calculate the difference (d) in ranks for each student (hours of sleep – test score = d) Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) d A 3 2 12 1 2-1 = 1 B 6 5 71 5-6 = -1 C 9 7 83 7-7 = 0 D 4 46 3-5 = -2 E 38 4-4 = 0 F 13 10 94 10-9 = 1 G 8 100 8-10 = -2 H 15 1-2 = -1 I 32 6-3 = 3 J 87 9-8 = 1
34
Additional info Step Now square the difference (d) to produce d2, and add up this column to create Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) d d2 A 3 2 12 1 B 6 5 71 -1 C 9 7 83 D 4 46 -2 E 38 F 13 10 94 G 8 100 H 15 I 32 J 87 Total
35
Step Additional info Now square the difference (d) (multiple by itself) to produce d2, and add up this column to create Participant Hours of sleep Rank Test score (%) d d2 A 3 2 12 1 B 6 5 71 -1 C 9 7 83 D 4 46 -2 E 38 F 13 10 94 G 8 100 H 15 I 32 J 87 Total 22
36
r Step The calculation: N = number of participants
Additional info Step The calculation: N = number of participants For our example, that’s 10 r
37
Additional info Step r So… Becomes… r 10 x 102 X 22
38
r Step r = + 0.867 Calculate the observed value of r 6 x 22 = 132
Additional info Step Calculate the observed value of r 6 x 22 = 132 10 x (100 – 1) = 990 132/990 = 0.133 r = r 10 x 102 X 22 This is your observed value – the one which you have calculated. What type of correlation does it suggest?
39
WHAT’S A CRITICAL VALUE?!
Additional info Step Compare your observed value to the critical value to find out whether your results are statistically significant (and if you can reject the null hypothesis!) WHAT’S A CRITICAL VALUE?! WHAT’S THE P VALUE?
40
Additional info Step Compare your observed value to the critical value to find out whether your results are statistically significant (and if you can reject the null hypothesis!) In order to find the critical value that you compare to, you need to know the answers to these questions: Is your hypothesis directional or non-directional Does that mean it’s one-tailed or two-tailed? What level of significance does Psychology use? How many participants did we have in our experiment? (how many animals) The stats package you will use for your practical does this all for you!
41
Step Additional info Compare your observed value to the critical value to find out whether your results are statistically significant (and if you can reject the null hypothesis!) Level of significance for two-tailed test 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.01 Level of significance for one-tailed test N 0.025 0.005 7 714 786 0.893 0.929 8 643 738 0.833 0.881 9 0.600 0.700 0.783 10 0.564 0.648 0.745 0.794 11 0.536 0.618 0.709 0.755 12 0.503 0.587 0.671 0.727
42
Additional info Step Compare your observed value to the critical value to find out whether your results are statistically significant (and if you can reject the null hypothesis!) Level of significance for two-tailed test 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.01 Level of significance for one-tailed test N 0.025 0.005 7 714 786 0.893 0.929 8 643 738 0.833 0.881 9 0.600 0.700 0.783 10 0.564 0.648 0.745 0.794 11 0.536 0.618 0.709 0.755 12 0.503 0.587 0.671 0.727
43
SPEARMANS RHO = Observed > Critical to be significant
Step Observed value = Critical value = SPEARMANS RHO = Observed > Critical to be significant
44
Step How to write this up: The results are significant
suggesting there is a strong positive relationship between hours of sleep and scores on a test. The observed value (+0.867) is greater than the critical value (+0.564) at p<0.05, one-tailed, N=10. Therefore, we can reject the null hypothesis.
45
In the exam You will NEVER have to calculate the test
But you do need to be able to use the observed value to decide whether the result is significant, and write a concluding statement. Have a go with some past paper questions on the rest of this slide
46
So…your data… On the Blog, I will put the Excel package so you can run Spearmans Rho yourselves. This is what you need to do…. Spearmans practice (Bennett) Spearmans practice for PP.xls
47
Exam Practice Jan 2012
49
Jan 2013
51
June 2010
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.