Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tunnel FETs Peng Wu Mar 30, 2017.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tunnel FETs Peng Wu Mar 30, 2017."— Presentation transcript:

1 Tunnel FETs Peng Wu Mar 30, 2017

2 Outline Introduction Challenges Experimental results Conclusion

3 Outline Introduction Challenges Experimental results Conclusion

4 Introduction With continuous scaling down, energy consumption has become a headache for IC industry VDD scaling limited by leakage current Pdynamic=CVDD2f Pleakage=VDDIOFF MOSFETs: fundamental limitation 300K due to switching mechanism: thermionic emission over a barrier VDD IOFF (exponetial) Requires a different switching mechanism Ionescu, A. M. et al., Nature, 479,

5 Introduction Band-to-band tunneling (BTBT)
Thermal tail in Fermi distribution cut off by energy filter: carriers effectively cooled down Dmitri Nikonov, in Beyond CMOS

6 Outline Introduction Challenges Experimental results Conclusion

7 Challenges Projections vs. Realities
Low ION (cannot turn on effectively) Bad slope / high IOFF (cannot turn off effectively)

8 Challenges ON-current:
Limited by transmission through tunneling barrier Ionescu, A. M. et al., Nature, 479, (Direct bandgap) use optimized structure (e.g. GAA nanowire) and high-K dielectric for tight gate control; use heterojunction λ: tunneling distance → m*, Eg: material properties → use material with small Eg and m*, e.g. III-V Si: not suitable for TFETs (large Eg and m*, indirect bandgap requires phonon-assisted tunneling → low transmission)

9 Challenges OFF-current Trap-assisted tunneling (TAT)
Traps: impurities, dangling bonds, surface roughness, etc Need to reduce Dit Redwan N. Sajjad et al., IEEE TED 63 (11),

10 Challenges OFF-current Trap-assisted tunneling (TAT) Band-tail effect
Heavy doping in source M. Abul Khayer et al., J. Appl. Phys. 110, (2011)

11 Challenges OFF-current Trap-assisted tunneling (TAT) Band-tail effect
Direct S-D tunneling For scaled device P. Wu et al., Proc. of SISPAD, (2015),

12 Challenges OFF-current Trap-assisted tunneling (TAT) Band-tail effect
Direct S-D tunneling Gate control GAA nanowire TFET Better electrostatic control for smaller diameter

13 Outline Introduction Challenges Experimental results Conclusion

14 Experimental results First sub-60mV/dec TFET: PRL 2004
Channel: carbon nanotube 300K

15 Experimental results: Si TFET
Si TFET (UC Berkeley) VLSI 2010 Source: NiSi/n+ Si Channel: i-Si (40nm SOI) Drain: p-Si Minimum SS: 46mV/dec Problem: low ON-current Kanghoon Jeon et al., VLSI 2010

16 Experimental results: III-V TFET
IEDM 2013 Source: p+ GaAs0.18Sb0.82 Channel: i In0.9Ga0.1As Drain: n+ In0.9Ga0.1As Large ION: VDS=0.5V Problem: bad SS (>200mV/dec)

17 Experimental results: III-V TFET
IEDM 2016 (Best TFET result so far) 20nm Source: p++ GaAsSb Channel: n- InAs Drain: n++ InAs ION: 10uA/um SS: 48mV/dec

18 Experimental results: III-V TFET
IEDM 2016 (Best TFET result so far) Stoichiometry not clear for GaAsSb Growth condition: Bulk GaSb/InAs forms broken-gap Nanowire from broken-gap to staggered-gap 20nm Source: p++ GaAsSb Channel: n- InAs Drain: n++ InAs Herbert Kroemer, Physica E 20 (2004) 196–203 Lind, E. et al., IEEE JEDS 3 (2014)

19 Experimental results: III-V TFET
IEEE EDL 2016 (Same Lund University group)

20 Experimental results: 2D TFET
Nature 2015 Source: p-Ge Channel: Bi-layer MoS2 (Drain: MoS2 n-Schottky contact) Minimum SS: 3.9mV/dec Average SS: 31.1mV/dec (4 decades) Scale bar: 5um Problem: scaling? ~20umx10um What about 100nmx1um?

21 Experimental results: summary
Si TFET: Advantages: most developed process → good gate control, low Dit, compatible with current foundry process Disadvantages: bad intrinsic material properties (large m*, Eg, indirect bandgap) → low ION III-V TFET: Advantages: low Eg, low m*, easy to form heterojunction Disadvantages: control of trap-assisted tunneling and band-tail effect 2D material: Advantages: ultra-thin body, no body-thickness fluctuation, no dangling bonds Disadvantages: process needs to be developed (material growth, high-K dielectric, doping method)

22 Conclusion Tunnel FET: a "drop-in" replacement of MOSFET for low-power applications Similar switch operation → require less effort in circuit design Ion lower than MOSFET → not suitable for high-performance applications Still challenges to be solved Slope not as steep as predicted Ion lower than required


Download ppt "Tunnel FETs Peng Wu Mar 30, 2017."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google