1. 6th May 2013 CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N
English Language and the New NATO Education and Training (E&IT) Framework
6th May 2013
CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N

2. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

3. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

4. Education & Training ACT: Execution
Why the Change?
ACO:
Requirements
Education & Training ACT: Execution
Evaluation

5. Why the Change? past future Exer
Multiple Training- opportunities on one subject without linkage, defined interfaces, etc…
NSO
…..
NETF
PTEC
national Facility
COE
future
RA:
Shape J9
DH:
CIMIC COE
RA:
SHAPE GA
DH:
NCGMO
Training-opportunities structured by subject, each subject headed by one responsible entity (RA) and administered by his DH
CIMIC
Gender
…..

6. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

7. What are the major changes
Structured approach towards definition of Requirements
Global Programming
Defined Roles & Responsibilities (R&R) within subjects
Structured content wise approach
Quality Assurance

8. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

9. Training Integration Plan
Requirements
MC Endorse- ment & NAC Approval of Non NATO Entities’ Activities
Development + Programming
Approval
Bi-SC Coordination
NFS Coordination
Partner Coordination
SACEUR’s Annual
Guidance on ETEE
JULY
Programming Board I
Programming Board II
Training Synchronization
Conference (TSC)
Programming Board III
JUNE

10. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

11. E&T Landscape new E&T Landscape
Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH
Content wise Structure STP-TRA-TNA
Global Programming
new E&T Landscape
International Educational Standards - QA

12. Global Programming

13. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

14. E&T Landscape new E&T Landscape
Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH
Content wise Structure STP-TRA-TNA
Global Programming
new E&T Landscape
International Educational Standards - QA

15. Global Programming – R&R
Organizational Structure
Maritime
PTEC
Gender
INTEL
COE
NSO
nat Institute
BMD
NMIOTC
Logistics
CIMIC RA DH
Training
Subject

16. Global Programming – R&R
Requirements
E&T Solutions
SAGE
Sec Gen AMS
Current & Future Ops
COEs
PTECs
Nat E&T Institutions
NFS Req
…..
…..
NDC
Requirement Authority RA
Department Head DH
Future Ops
PARTNER assistance Req
NATIONS assistance Req
NMIOTC
JWC JFTC
NSO

17. Global Programming – R&R
JFT
Requirements
E&T Solutions
SAGE
Sec Gen AMS
Current & Future Ops
COEs
PTECs
Nat E&T Institutions
NFS Req
NDC
Requirement Authority RA
Department Head DH
Future Ops
PARTNER assistance Req
NATIONS assistance Req
NMIOTC
JWC JFTC
NSO

18. Global Programming – R&RDH
Training RA
DH DH
Training
Subject X
Subject Y
“there can only be one” RA
(high level entity within NATO)
Depending on complexity of a subject there can be more than one DH
(not limited to NATO entities, not necessarily a training facility)

19. Global Programming – R&R
JFT (Joint Force Trainer)
Directions and Guidance (D&G) for NATO E&T
Coordinates with SHAPE to propose RAs
Appoints DHs (in cooperation with RA)
Receives reports from annual Discipline Conference and provides D&G in response
Supports development of SAGE
Reacts on recommendations from RA/DH and provides D&G if necessary
Sets standards for QA-Process

20. Global Programming – R&R
JETE (Joint Education, Training and Exercises Division)
Coordinates E&IT processes
Supports developments of STPs, TRAs and TNAs
Provides assistance to Nations if requested
Provides experts to organize/lead the accreditation process

21. Global Programming – R&R
Gathers, defines and prioritizes the operational requirements
Defines NATO’s Level of Ambitions (LoA) for his discipline
Gives D&G to DH on desired end state of E&T within his area of responsibility
Keeps DH updated (concepts, doctrine, policy, procedures)
Reviews requirements and capabilities annually
Establishes links to RA’s and DH’s where disciplines influence each other, overlap or connect closely

22. Global Programming – R&RDH
Supports STP and TRA with expertise
Leads TNA for identified training gaps (needs to establish internal expertise to conduct TNA’s)
Establishes programme within subject
Conducts annual Discipline Conference
Recommends changes to RA
Does not need to conduct training itself
Does not give directions to training institutions

23. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

24. E&T Landscape new E&T Landscape
Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH
Content wise Structure STP-TRA-TNA
Global Programming
new E&T Landscape
International Educational Standards - QA

25. Global Programming - Content

26. Global Programming - Content
Content wise Structure
Strategic Training Plan
Training Requirements
Analysis
Training Needs Analysis
STP
holistic view
broad and general
TRA
1st Analysis
outcome: Programme
TNA
In Depth Analysis
outcome: Course

27. Global Programming - Content
STP (Strategic Training Plan)
Provides an holistic overview over a subject encompassing individual training, collective training, Key Leader Training and exercises
Aims to provide D&G for implementation of new capability or solution to operational shortfall
Define NATO’s level of ambition for the field/discipline
Link with NATO’s high level strategic objectives
STP

28. Global Programming - Content
TRA (Training Requirement Analysis)
Based upon approved STP
Aims at operationalizing the capability by identifying training gaps (Definition of the levels to be trained (pol-mil, strat, ops, tac) and matching this with the current training inventory)
Outcome: a) definition of levels to be trained b) decision upon Depth of Knowledge c) Inventory of existing courses d) gap Analysis
TRA

29. Global Programming - Content
TNA (Training Needs Analysis)
Based on result (Training gaps) of TRA
Specify requirements for trainings to fill identified gaps
Design and development of course
Conduct and validation of course
TNA

30. Global Programming Relationships, Procedures
Element RA DH
JETE
JFT MC
Product
STP
lead
support
recommend
approve
Adaptive and flexible plan to unite and synchronize training efforts
TRA
Lead/ approve
Academic plan including recommended solutions for identified gaps and redundancies
TNA
lead / approve
provide QA support and E&IT support
acknowledge
Defines learning and enabling objectives required to eliminate performance gaps, and systematically delivers a training opportunity
Discipline Conference
Discipline alignment plan

31. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

32. E&T Landscape new E&T Landscape
Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH
Content wise Structure STP-TRA-TNA
Global Programming
new E&T Landscape
International Educational Standards - QA

33. QA & NATO E&T Concept QA Programme covers:
Alignment to International Educational Standards
Ensuring highest possible quality in E&T institutions
Autonomy and flexibility of institutions
Continuous improvement of E&T quality
QA Programme covers:
Institution’s QA policies and directives
Curriculum Analysis, Design, Development and Implementation
Evaluation, monitoring and continuous improvement

34. QA & NATO E&T QA and course accreditation
2 criteria for course accreditation:
Course fulfills a NATO requirement
Institution meets QA standards

35. E&T Policy MC 458/2 CFI Concept 75-7 75-3 Bi-SC 75-2
MC 458/2: NATO’s Education, Training, Exercise and Evaluation (ETEE) Policy
Bi-SC 75-2: Education, Training, Exercise and Evaluation Directive (E&TD)
75-3
Bi-SC 75-3: Collective Training and Exercise Directive (CT&ED)
Bi-SC 75-7: Education and Individual Training Directive (E&IT)
75-7
CFI Concept
including E&T Concept

36. Agenda Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes?
Requirement Cycle
Global Programming
Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH)
Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA)
Quality Assurance
Future of English Language Training
wrap-up & ???

37. Future of English Language Training
NATO E&T vs National E&T
Focus Area (General Language – Terminology – Teacher’s Training)
RA – IS?
DH – BILC?
STP – TRA - TNA
Experts’ view needed!

38. ??? CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych UKR N  volodymyr.khilkevych@act.nato.int
+1(757)
DSN: