Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRachel Sparks Modified over 6 years ago
1
Dr. Alice Ortmann University of South Alabama Dauphin Island Sea Lab
Identifying likely sources of fecal contamination in Little Lagoon, Alabama Dr. Alice Ortmann University of South Alabama Dauphin Island Sea Lab Image: AL.com, Mobile Press Register
2
Project Background Water quality sampling suggested an issue with fecal coliforms (FCB) in Little Lagoon Not correlated with any measured variables
3
Sea Grant Funded Project
Identify the source of the fecal contamination so an appropriate management plan can be developed Contamination from humans higher health risk can be managed Contamination from wildlife low health risk much harder to manage
4
Use two DNA-based approaches to identify sources
Comparison of E. coli communities within the lagoon to communities in inflowing water. Quantify total Bacteroidales in the lagoon and determine what percentage came from humans, dogs and cows.
5
Sample Sites within Little Lagoon
Gulf of Mexico Bon Secour Bay Pass 5 4 3 2 1 Sample each site from March 2011-February 2012 Collect 40 ‘random’ samples throughout the year for E. coli analysis Google Earth Image
6
Approach Collect ~20 L of water Quantify FCB (LLPS)
Remove large particles and concentrate cells to 1 ml PCR amplify 2 genes from E. coli Generate fingerprints with DGGE Compare fingerprints from different locations Quantify total Bacteroidales (BacUni) Quantify host specific genes Determine which host contributes the most genes Approach
7
FCB were often above the regulatory limit during the study
8
E. coli communities through out the lagoon are simple and well mixed
Standard mdh communities from Little Lagoon
9
Lagoon communities are significantly different than inflow communities
10
E. coli communities analysis does not indicate a specific source of contamination
Inflow sites included: small pond sediment streams drainage freshwater vs. saltwater E. coli and close relatives can survive in aquatic environments, so these may represent naturally occurring organisms
11
Use qPCR to identify the host of the Bacteroidales
They are a family (multiple species) of Bacteria that live in animal guts obligate anaerobes do not grow in aquatic environments high abundances in feces quantitative PCR (qPCR) sensitive with good detection very specific, using DNA sequences
12
We used four different assays to determine the host of Bacteroidales
BacUni → detect all members of the Bacteroidales regardless of their host BacHum → detect only Bacteroidales from human hosts BacDog → detect only Bacteroidales from dog (maybe cat) hosts BacCow → detect only Bacteroidales from cow (maybe horse) hosts
13
Bacteroidales genes were detected at all sites throughout the year
**8 samples missing from analysis
14
The abundance of BacUni did not correlate with the abundance of FCB
15
Bacteroidales from cows and dogs was much lower than BacUni estimates
***BacDog, extremely high: Site1 January and Site5 February 1.6 106
16
Together, they represent a small fraction of the total Bacteroidales
17
And they do not correlate well with FCBs
18
BacHum was always detected in Little Lagoon
19
BacHum was also not correlated with the abundance of FCB
20
Most of the time, a small number of the BacUni could be accounted for by human Bacteroidales
21
A significant amount of Bacteroidales genes are not accounted for by humans, dogs or cows
22
Bacteroidales analysis suggests human fecal contamination at low levels
Like reflects the fact there are humans using the lagoon Maximum estimate: 0.08 g of fecal material/L Local maximums: reflect recent use Humans not likely the source of the large increases in FCB Estimates do not correlate with FCB Naturally occurring strains/relatives of E.coli
23
Acknowledgements Daniel Presley-E. coli analysis and qPCR
Chris Lee-new BacUni analysis Justin Liefer-sample collection LLPS-sample collection analysis Lei Wang and Natalie Ortell-working with Chris Image from:
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.