Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NURS 560, Fall 2015 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NURS 560, Fall 2015 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis"— Presentation transcript:

1 NURS 560, Fall 2015 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis
Motivation Concepts NURS 560, Fall 2015 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis

2 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

3 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

4 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

5 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Defintions Processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal. Robbins & Judge, 2014, p. 20 Intensity – how hard you try Direction – intensity toward organizational goal Persistence – how long can it be maintained Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior, (12th ed.). Boston: Pearson Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

6 Samuel Merritt University
MOTIVATION You have to learn to crawl before you can shop Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved N 560, Fall 2015

7 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Memories What motivates you to succeed – do well? Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

8 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Classification Need Theories Maslow - Hierarchy McClelland – Achievement/Affiliation McGregor – X (negative) and Y (positive) Herzberg Hygiene factors Motivating factors Self-Determination and Cognitive Evaluation Theory Goal-setting theory Equity Theory/Organizational Justice Expectancy Theory Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

9 Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

10 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
McClelland - Needs Need for Achievement - nAch Need for Power - nPow Need for Affiliation – nAff Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

11 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
McGregor Theory X and Y Theory X Managers believe: Theory Y Managers believe: Workers inherently dislike work Must be directed Must be coerced into performing it NOTE: Little proof that X and Y theories and Maslow’s hierarchy lack empirical support Employees view work as natural as rest or play Average employee accepts and even seeks responsibility McGregor advocated participation, responsible and challenging jobs, good group relations Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

12 Dr. Mileva Saulo, All rights reserved.
Theory Z William Ouchi Ford Foundation Worker Exchange Project Humanistic approach from Japan develops better ways to motivate people collective decision-making long term employment slower promotions indirect supervision Quality Circles mentoring promotes quality & productivity Dr. Mileva Saulo, All rights reserved.

13 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

14 Two Factor Theory – Motivation-Hygiene
Satisfiers - Motivators Dissatisfiers - Hygiene Job Security Org. Financial stability Achievement Recognition Work itself Responsibility Advancement Growth Policy & Administration Lack of career future Dislike of position Supervision Relationship with supervisor Work conditions Salary Relationships with peers Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

15 Self-Determination & Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Level of autonomy Intrinsic Incentives Work that gives meaning to my life Extrinsic Incentives Tied to values, goals, outcomes Job Engagement Investment of physical, cognitive, & emotional energies Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

16 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Goal Setting Theory Specific acts as stimulator Feedback essential Participation in goal setting Contingencies Belief it can happen Simple better than complex Culture bound Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

17 Self-Efficacy Theory Social Cognitive/Learning
Belief in capability – for low esteem, bring goal and self-efficacy together Absence of personality factors Increase by: Did I do it in the past? Enactive mastery Watch someone else – Vicarious modeling Someone convinces you, you can – Verbal persuasion Arousal Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

18 Bandura – Self-Efficacy
Enactive mastery Gain the relevant experience Vicarious modeling Watch someone else Verbal persuasion Someone convinces you that you have what you need to succeed Arousal “Psyched-up” to perform Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

19 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Equity Theory Reward equal to relevant others – equity Ratio of work/reward = under rewarded  tension, unjust Referrent Self made, outside Other inside, outside Variables Gender; Length of tenure; Level in organization Amount of education or professionalism Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

20 Inequity, Employees, Choice
Change input – Reduce/Cease effort Change outcomes Distort perception of self-others Choose different referent Leave the field Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

21 Concepts of Justice - Fairness
Perception Multidimensional Distributive Organizational Procedural Process – present point of view about desired outcomes Explanation – clear reasons about outcome Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

22 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Organizational Justice: Overall perception of what is fair in the workplace. Example: I think this is a fair place to work (Robbins & Judge, 2012, p. 110) Distributive Justice Procedural Justice Interactional Justice Definition: Perceived fairness of outcome Example: I got the pay raise I deserved Definition: Perceived fairness of process used to determine outcome Example: I had input into the process to give raises and was given a good explanation of why I received the raise I did. Definition: Perceived degree to which one is treated with dignity and respect Example: When telling me about my raise, my supervisor was very nice and complementary. Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

23 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
Expectancy Theory Effort: Effort  Good performance  Reward  Personal goals met Will maximum effort be rewarded? Good performance Will it lead to organizational rewards? Reward: If rewarded, are they personally attractive? Robbins & Judge, 2012 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

24 CAVEAT EMPTOR Theories are often Culture Bound
Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

25 APPLICATION More on 12 November
Motivating by Changing the Work Environment Word Re-design Magnet Hospitals ASK: What motivates your colleagues? How do nurses feel about all nurses earning the same salary based on time in role? What mechanisms are there to reward performance Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved

26 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved
For Our Next Meeting ASK: What motivates your colleagues? How do nurses feel about all nurses earning the same salary? What mechanisms are there to reward performance excellence – going beyond what is required? Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis, All Rights Reserved


Download ppt "NURS 560, Fall 2015 Dr. Mileva Saulo Lewis"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google