Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
ACB ISED Canada Radio Certification
4/15/2018 ACB ISED Canada Radio Certification Michael Derby ACB Europe LPRA 18 May 2017
2
Introduction Presenter Michael Derby, ACB
American Certification Body – offices in USA, EU, Asia FCB for ISED Canada Certifications TCB for USA FCC Certifications RCB for Japan MIC Certifications CB for Hong Kong OFCA Certifications EU RE Directive Notified Body EU R&TTE Directive Notified Body EU EMC Directive Notified Body Compliance training
3
Introduction Michael Derby, ACB
Manufacturer (product development and EMC research) Test Lab (EMC, Radio, RF Exposure, Consultancy) Certification Body (product approvals) TCB Council; Chair, Vice-Chair EMCTLA; Secretary ETSI; Contributor Compliance Associations; Active member
4
Agenda Who is ISED Canada? Overview of ISED Canada certifications
Administrative changes in recent years Test labs and accreditations Changes to Radio Standards Specifications Some frequency band alignment plans Similarities and comparisons with FCC
5
Canada It’s not called “IC” anymore
“Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada” (ISED Canada) Some think of “North American” certification; but the USA and Canada are different countries They accept the same test procedures and in many cases the technical requirements are the same However, that is not within any kind of ‘rule’ There is no formal harmonisation
6
Canada ISED Canada To sell into Canada, a product must be authorised for use in Canada For radio transmitters, this is most commonly a certification authorisation Testing must be performed to the most recent applicable Radio Standard Specification and certification completed by a Certification Body RSSs are freely available online
7
Canada Certifications
ISED Canada Certifications Canada does not have a big book of rules like the FCC; nor a Directive like the EU Canada has Radio Specification Standards and radios are certified to those standards RSS-GEN described the general requirements RSS-1xx for licensed transmitters RSS-2xx for license exempt transmitters RSP-100 for Certification instructions RSS-102 for RF Exposure
8
Canada Certifications
ISED Canada Certifications Test to the standard Such as RSS-1xx or RSS-2xx Include the common requirements As per RSS-GEN Apply for Certification As per RSP-100 Labelled with ISED certification number Presently still “IC: “
9
Canada Certifications
FCC TCB completes the certification, on FCC website, and issues the final Grant as a ‘screen shot’ It is an FCC Grant, generated and sent by the TCB Product is certified immediately when TCB clicks ‘accept’ MIC CB completes the review and issues a certificate to the manufacturer It is a certificate generated by the CB Product is certified when the certificate is issued
10
Canada Certifications
ISED Canada Certification process ISED CB completes the review and issues a certificate to the manufacturer; while at the same time submitting a certification application to ISED Manufacturer gets a certificate generated by the CB ISED performs their own review The product is only certified when ISED lists the product on their website (Radio Equipment List – REL) It could be several days before the product is finally listed by ISED and it is not certified until that time
11
Canada Labelling Recent Administrative Changes
“Recent” means the last year or two In the past, “Model: “ was needed on product Now the ‘model’ has been renamed to HVIN HVIN (Hardware Version Identification Number) More like a model number, than a hardware version Must be on the product, such as on the label It’s the manufacturer’s name for that product Manufacturer cannot have multiple certifications (certification numbers) that use the same HVIN You cannot re-use that HVIN As with old “model number”
12
Canada Labelling PMN (Product Marketing Name)
The name it is advertised and ‘commonly known as’ Must be somewhere, such as the product, marketing material, user manual, company website, etc. FVIN (Firmware Version Identification Number) Applicable if it is relevant to compliance ‘Optional’ during certification process If applicable; it must accessible on the product
13
Canada Test Labs Testing to RSS-1xx or RSS-2xx
Testing for product certification Must be done on a test site listed with ISED Since 31st December 2016, accreditation is mandatory for listing or re-listing a lab e.g. Lab listed in November 2016 will require re-listing in November 2017 and will need accreditation then Right now; accreditation is basic, to ANSI C63.4 Right now; accreditation for SAR test not required
14
Canada Test Labs Accreditation for certification testing
ISED is closely watching the FCC! From 13th July 2017, all certification and DoC testing for FCC must be done at a recognised accredited test lab; with specific scope details All FCC certification applications with unaccredited testing must be complete by 13th October 2017 ISED is considering adopting the same approach No timeline suggested yet Would include RF/EMC and SAR
15
RSS updates Transition periods
New version issued effective immediately This has always been the way Can be problematic with big changes Recent examples saw transition periods A new idea, a little confusing at times Dates were not always clear
16
RSS updates Transition periods
Standards will now include transition periods Each standard will clarify transition dates, certification dates, grand-fathering, etc. Typically expected to be 6 months During the transition period, either old or new version can be used But not a combination of the two
17
RSS updates Transition periods
One time certification like FCC, or ‘real time’ up to date re-assessment like the EU? We are used to ‘one time certification’ in Canada Actually Canada law requires compliance to the latest standard, even for existing products! ISED risk assessment that avoids re-assessment Sometimes we do see re-assessments, e.g. RF Exposure The 5 GHz WLAN issue proves that the FCC is also not immune to this ‘mandatory re-assessment’ idea May allow important changes and flexible implementation of new rules
18
RSS updates Some common RSS updates RSS-247 issue 2 - DTS and FHSS
WLAN/Bluetooth/ZigBee, etc., from RSS-210 RSS-247 issue 2 was published February 2017 We are in the transition period, use issue 1 or 2 RSS-GEN issue General Requirements Revision is in progress Will include home kits and demonstration units Will include details of transition periods Will include labelling and test method details
19
RSS updates Some common RSS updates
RSS-220 issue Ultra-Wideband Devices Issue 2 is under review RSS-210 issue License Exempt SRD Plan to align with FCC for GHz equipment RSS-216 issue Wireless Power Transfer Being updated for limits and test standards Will refer to the future ANSI C63.30
20
RSS updates Some standards in revision, with a view to harmonise requirements with the FCC RSS-119 issue 13 Land Mobile and Fixed 758 MHz to 763 MHz, 788 MHz to 793 MHz, MHz to 768 MHz, 793 MHz to 798 MHz RSS-191 issue 4 27.5 GHz to GHz, 37 GHz to 40 GHz RSS-181 issue 2 1.705 to 50.0 MHz
21
RSS updates Some standards in revision, with a view to harmonise requirements with the FCC RSS-251 issue 2 Field Disturbance Sensors (76-77 GHz) 77 GHz to 81 GHz under review for harmonization 46.7 GHz to 46.9 GHz (vehicular) may be removed RSS-252 issue 1 Intelligent Transport Systems Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) for on-board unit may harmonise with FCC
22
RSS updates RSS-102 and RF Exposure Supplementary Procedure; SPR-002
Nerve Stimulation Exposure Limits Testing applies to all transmitters in the range 3 kHz to 10 MHz Has been mandatory since 1st March 2017 Caused problems for many manufacturers Very difficult to find a test lab that can do it!
23
Comparisons to the FCC Comparisons to the FCC
In recent years, radio standards were not aligned for license exempt transmitters ANSI C63.10 and C63.4 version number Now these are aligned At this time, licensed transmitters not aligned FCC uses ANSI/TIA-603-D ISED uses ANSI C63.26
24
Comparisons to the FCC Comparisons to the FCC
Still differences in test requirements for some 5 GHz WLAN devices Boosters RF Exposure assessment thresholds Threshold for determining if a test is needed Nerve Simulation RF Exposure tests 3 kHz to 10 MHz
25
Comparisons to the FCC Comparisons to the FCC
Module discussions for FCC and a more ‘holistic’ approach to compliance FCC emphasis on assessment of final product; in cases where a certified module is used FCC may amend modular KDB to clarify that testing on final system may be necessary ISED recognises and follows the FCC modular KDB and therefore this could affect products with modules installed for Canada too
26
Comparisons to the FCC Comparisons to the FCC
Module discussions for FCC and a more ‘holistic’ approach to compliance It’s a reminder that “modular approval” was intended as a solution to save the installer from the requirement to certify the final end product; but it was not intended to avoid any future testing Save on authorisation process, but still have responsibility for final product compliance
27
Questions? Contact:
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.