Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices"— Presentation transcript:

1 Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices
F&A Negotiations Lupe Valencia, University of Washington Shelly Benson, University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign Shannon Fisher, Kansas State University Mira L. Levine, MAXIMUS Adrienne Clifton, MAXIMUS Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices General Conference: 11/2 – 11/4, 2016

2 Learning Objectives CAS & ONR Contact Information Understanding the Negotiation Process Summary of University Experiences Negotiation Experience & Issues DS-2 Update Things to review before the submission and before the negotiation

3 Cost Allocation Services (CAS)
Formerly known as the Division of Cost Allocation Services (DCA) Four regional offices in New York, NY, Bethesda, MD, Dallas, TX, and San Francisco, CA Negotiates the majority of Universities

4 Cost Allocation Services (CAS)
Electronic Submission of F&A & Fringe Proposals 25MB limit, may have to send Financial Statements and the F&A Proposal separately if you reach the limit. Submit to:

5 Office of Naval Research (ONR)
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) conducts the audit of the F&A Cost Rate Proposal ONR conducts the negotiation Negotiates for 45 Universities Electronic Submission is currently not available

6 The Negotiation Process
F&A Proposals are due 6 months after your fiscal year end FYE June 30th, due December 31st FYE August 31st, due February 28th If you need an additional 90 days to complete your proposal, you can request an extension by ing the CAS Branch Chief: Or by contacting Linda Shipp from ONR: or

7 The Negotiation Process
Once proposals are submitted, you should receive notice of receipt. For CAS, proposal reviews are on a first in, first out basis. Will receive 2-3 rounds of data request/questions May or may not include a site visit to validate space and equipment Phone negotiation (after site visit) New rates established 12 months and beyond

8 The Negotiation Process
Once proposals are submitted, you should receive notice of receipt. For ONR, they will send the proposal to DCAA so they can begin their audit. DCAA will have numerous requests DCAA will typically have multiple on-site visits (entrance conference, equipment validation, space validation, exit conference) ONR will come on-site for the negotiation New rates established 6 months to 12 months and beyond

9 W W FY13 Base Current Rates Proposed Rates OR - $352M OSA - $24M OR –
UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON FY13 Base OR - $352M OSA - $24M Current Rates OR – FY % FY 18 55% FY % OSA – 37% Proposed Rates OR – 55.87% includes 1.3% UCA OSA – 38.48% W

10 W W Space inventory conducted prior to and during base year
UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON Space inventory conducted prior to and during base year Space survey only conducted every base year 100 departments surveyed, additional reviews conducted based on varying MTDC thresholds and/or lab space ASF W

11 W Status of Submission Negotiation Process Negotiations Issues
UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON Submitted November 2014 Status of Submission Completed May 2016 Negotiation Process New buildings coming online Specialty rate related Negotiations Issues W

12 W Negotiation Questions: Standard CAS request Building component lives
UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON Negotiation Questions: Standard CAS request Building component lives Department paid O&M O&M expensed vs. capitalized W

13 W Utility Cost Adjustment (UCA)
UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON Utility Cost Adjustment (UCA) Automatically granted 1.3% UCA for base year 2013 W

14 W Disclosure Statement (DS-2)
UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON Disclosure Statement (DS-2) Updates Submitted: Mostly UG related. Pending final discussions. W

15 FY14 Base OR - $247M Inst – $433M OSA - $64M Current Rates OR – 58.6% Inst – 45.8% OSA – 25.4%, 28.6%, 31.9% Proposed Rates OR – 63.4% (plus .37% for projection) UCA – 1.3% (.54% actual calculation) Inst – 45.4% OSA – 31.4%

16 DRU MTDC Threshold: OR >= $2M and INST < $250K
MRU MTDC Threshold: OR >= $1M and INST > $250K 41 Departments Surveyed Alternative Space Methodology Used

17 Negotiated Rates June 28, 2016 Submitted February 2015
Status of Submission Submitted February 2015 Negotiation Process Negotiated Rates June 28, 2016 Negotiations Issues Electronic versus Paper Buildings going Off-Line College Administration

18 Audit/Negotiation Questions:
Many audit requests (DCAA) Library, College Admin, Dept Admin, Space Surveys, Fringe Benefit Distributions, Buildings, Allocations, O&M, Service Rates, projections, effort cost share, depreciation, and more. Sample sizes larger/short timelines Internal controls Three auditors/audits at same time

19 Utility Cost Adjustment (UCA)
Room Types Included: Research Lab and Research Lab Service Greenhouse Space Automatically granted 1.3% UCA for 2014 base year only.

20 Disclosure Statement (DS-2)
Version 3 (effective 7/1/07) – not audited Version 4 (effective 7/1/10) – not audited Version 5: (effective 10/1/13) – Updated for change in Library organization structure, related cost pools and allocations Version 6: (effective 7/1/16) – Updated for UG and move from 24% Admin Allowance to 26% Admin CAP

21 FY15 Base OR - $43.1M OSA - $29.2M AG - $39.9M Current Rates OR – 50% OSA – 35% AG – 43% Proposed Rates OR – 56.8% UCA – 1.16% OSA – 35.21% AG – 46.31%

22 Have used departmental S&W’s the last three cycles
No campus-wide space survey Functional use of space based on S&W Have used departmental S&W’s the last three cycles

23 Biosecurity Research Institute (BSL-3, BSL3Ag building)
Surveyed Research Labs and Support Rooms in Biosecurity Research Institute (BSL-3, BSL3Ag building) Space Ownership Verified by Departments Acquired One New Research Building, Other Major Renovations Since 2010

24 Additional data requested in July Initial rate offer in October
Status of Submission Submitted March 28, 2016 Negotiation Process Additional data requested in July Initial rate offer in October Negotiations on-going

25 Utility Cost Adjustment (UCA)
Room Types Included: Research Lab and Research Lab Service Greenhouse Space No follow up questions, so far.

26 Disclosure Statement (DS-2)
Updated and submitted April 2016: Updated for UG and F&A Proposal Changes

27 Things to Review Before the Submission
Financial Statement Comparison

28 Things to Review Before the Submission
Cost Group Comparison

29 Things to Review Before the Submission
Space ASF Comparison

30 Things to Review Before the Submission
Research Component Comparison

31 Things to Review Before the Submission
Effective Rate of Recovery

32 Things to Review Before the Submission
What a point is worth

33 Things to Consider Before the Negotiation
How many years should you negotiate for? 3-4 years is typical Do you have any new research intensive buildings coming on-line? Other factors: new financial system, staff retiring, etc… Would you prefer a fixed or stepped rate adjustment? Good Negotiator

34 Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices
Questions Comments Thank You!! F&A Negotiations Lupe Valencia, University of Washington Shelly Benson, University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign Shannon Fisher, Kansas State University Mira L. Levine, MAXIMUS Adrienne Clifton, MAXIMUS Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices General Conference: 11/2 – 11/4, 2016


Download ppt "Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google