Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Influence of the loading path on the deformation mechanisms of magnesium alloys
K. Máthis1, J. Čapek1, B. Clausen2, T. Panzner3 1Charles University in Prague, Department of Physics of Materials, Ke Karlovu 5, Prague, Czech Republic 2Los Alamos National Laboratory, MST-8, NM 87545, Los Alamos, USA 3Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Neutron Scattering and Imaging, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
2
Motivation Deformation mechanisms are frequently studied for Mg alloys
a lot of interesting modeling results the experimental proof of theory is often not available Our goal Study of the influence of the loading path on the twinning evolution activity of the slip systems using advanced in-situ experimental methods Advantage: getting statistically relevant dataset
3
In-situ acoustic emission & neutron diffraction
Real-time, non-destructive techniques Suited for global monitoring – information from the entire volume ACOUSTIC EMISSION NEUTRON DIFFRACTION Twin nucleation Dislocation movement Twin growth Activity of slip systems
4
Neutron diffraction – uniaxial tests
LANSCE – Los Alamos Set up ∡ 45° loading direction and incident beam ∡ 90° incident and diffracted beam Axial and radial planes Complementary information about the changes in the microstructure
5
Neutron diffraction – biaxial tests
PSI – Villigen Multi-axial deformation Proportional (1:1) and non-proportional (2:1) tests Strain field monitored by digital image correlation (DIC) technique 1 detector Horizontally: Q || loading dir. Vertically: Q loading dir. S. Van Petegem et al., Acta Mater. 2016
6
In-situ neutron diffraction and twinning
Neutron diffraction – in-situ monitoring of twin growth Tension Active twinning system {10-12} change of intensities of peaks {00.2} and {10.0} estimation for twinned volume
7
In-situ neutron diffraction and twinning
Neutron diffraction – in-situ monitoring of twin growth Tension Active twinning system {10-12} change of intensities of peaks {00.2} and {10.0} estimation for twinned volume
8
Neutron diffraction – Twin volume estimation
2-bank Rietveld refinement assuming an axisymmetric texture Development of the axial distribution function for the peak during deformation J. Čapek et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 602 (2014) pp
9
Neutron diffraction – Twin volume estimation
2-bank Rietveld refinement assuming an axisymmetric texture Development of the axial distribution function for the peak during deformation J. Čapek et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 602 (2014) pp
10
Neutron diffraction – Twin volume estimation
2-bank Rietveld refinement assuming an axisymmetric texture Development of the axial distribution function for the peak during deformation J. Čapek et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 602 (2014) pp
11
Neutron diffraction – Twin volume estimation
2-bank Rietveld refinement assuming an axisymmetric texture Development of the axial distribution function for the peak during deformation J. Čapek et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 602 (2014) pp
12
Neutron diffraction – Twin volume estimation
2-bank Rietveld refinement assuming an axisymmetric texture Development of the axial distribution function for the peak during deformation J. Čapek et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 602 (2014) pp
13
In-situ neutron diffraction & disloc.
Diffraction peak line broadening caused by anisotropic strain field of dislocations Convolutional multiple whole profile (CMWP) analysis Mean crystallite size <x>area Dislocation density Parameters q1 & q2 - used for calculation of fraction of disl. in different slip systems Disl. contrast factor:
14
Source: M.D. Sangid, Acta Mater., 2011
Acoustic emission Dislocations – detection of avalanche-like motion of large number of dislocations Twin nucleation – collective motion of several hundred twin dislocations – well detectable Twin growth – slow process – not detectable Source: M.D. Sangid, Acta Mater., 2011
15
Basic principles of AE measurement
Classical approach Threshold level 1st level – exclusion of the background noise 2nd level – separating strong signals Dead-time The recording of an AE event terminates, when the signal does not cross the threshold during the dead-time
16
Basic principles of AE measurement
Classical approach – hit-based processing Amplitude, risetime, duration, energy, counts, count rate
17
Basic principles of AE measurement
Classical approach – hit-based processing Amplitude, risetime, duration, energy, counts, count rate How to discriminate the twinning and dislocation AE events? In Mg difficult – concurrent activity of def. mechanisms – overlapping…
18
Basic principles of AE measurements
DATA STREAMING – new approach The classical AE measurements – getting AE parameters in real-time BUT sensitivity on set-up parameters, problem with overlapping events Data streaming – continuous sampling and storing of the signal AE parameters from post-processing – no data loss, better fit of set-up parameters Large data files (~1 Gb/min), long computing time
19
Typical “window” size: 2 ms
Statistical analysis of AE data New method– adaptive sequential k-means (ASK) analysis Pomponi, Vinogradov, Mech. Syst. Sig Proc., November 2013 Analysis of streaming data – definition of analysis window (time interval) calculation of the power spectral density (PSD) for windows characteristic values of PSD used for clustering Typical “window” size: 2 ms
20
Statistical analysis of AE data
Calculation of PSD function – distribution of signals’ power over different freq.
21
Statistical analysis of AE data
New method– adaptive sequential k-means (ASK) analysis Pomponi, Vinogradov, Mech. Syst. Sig Proc., November 2013 Analysis of streaming data – definition of analysis window (time interval) calculation of the power spectral density (PSD) for windows characteristic values of PSD used for clustering
22
Statistical analysis of AE data
Output – statistically well separated “CLUSTERS”
23
Statistical analysis of AE data
Output – statistically well separated “CLUSTERS” Allocation of clusters to deformation mechanisms: Characteristic features – twinning – high energy – dislocation motion – low energy, broader frequency range Time appearance – e.g. noise at the onset of straining Supplementary experiments – neutron diffraction – digital image correlation etc. K. Máthis et al. Int. J. Plast. 72 (2015) pp
24
Statistical analysis of AE data
Output – time evolution of # of elements in particular clusters – information about DYNAMICS of deformation mechanisms
25
Statistical analysis of AE data
Output – time evolution of # of elements in particular clusters – information about DYNAMICS of deformation mechanisms Basal slip Twinning Noise
26
Output: dominant deformation mechanism in a given time range
Statistical analysis of AE data Output – time evolution of # of elements in particular clusters – information about DYNAMICS of deformation mechanisms Basal slip Twinning Noise Output: dominant deformation mechanism in a given time range
27
Loading mode dependence
of deformation mechanisms UNIAXIAL TESTS Pure Mg, random texture Tension, compression
28
Experimental – Pure Mg, Mg-Al
Specimen – Mg-Al magnesium alloys as-cast, random texture Mg + 1 wt.% Zr – grain size: 100 µm (pure Mg) Mg + 2 wt.% Al – grain size: 85 µm (Mg2Al) Pure Mg Strain rate 210-3 s-1 Testing mode and temperature Tension, Compression 20ºC Methods Acoustic emission, Neutron diffraction Mg2Al
29
Loading mode dep. - EPSC simulations
EPSC model – Voce empirical hardening law Model parameters in MPa t0 t1 q0 q1 Basal 4 2 200 125 Prismatic 19 8 250 100 Pyramidal 75 60 300 150 Twinning K. Máthis et al - Int. J. Plast.. (2015) DOI: /j.ijplas Good agreement of experimental and theoretical data
30
We will discuss the {𝟏𝟎 𝟏 2} 𝟏𝟎 𝟏𝟏 extension twinning
31
Twinning - EPSC simulations + AE
TWIN NUCLEATION K. Máthis et al - Int. J. Plast.. (2015) EPSC - Larger number of twin variants nucleated in tension
32
Twinning - EPSC simulations + AE
TWIN NUCLEATION K. Máthis et al - Int. J. Plast.. (2015) DOI: /j.ijplas Larger number of twin variants nucleated in tension – good agreement with the AE data (ASK analysis)
33
Twinning - EPSC simulations + ND
TWIN GROWTH Larger twinned volume in compression – good agreement with the ND data K. Máthis et al - Int. J. Plast.. (2015) DOI: /j.ijplas
34
Loading mode dependence of twinning
This part worked out in cooperation with Matthew Barnett EBSD – 1% strain Loading direction T1, C1 – ideally oriented for twinning – more variants in tension T2, C2 – lower Schmid factor for twinning – less variants in tension
35
Loading mode dependence of twinning
Tension Larger fraction of grains with SF > 0 BUT only 10% has SF > 0.4 Compression 25% of grains SF > 0.4 More grains with high SF
36
Loading mode dependence of twinning
Tension Larger fraction of grains with SF > 0 BUT only 10% has SF > 0.4 Compression 25% of grains SF > 0.4 More grains with high SF High SF – one or two variants nucleated in compression Up to six in tension Higher number of twins in tension (cf. AE)
37
Loading mode dependence of twinning
Tension Larger fraction of grains with SF > 0 BUT only 10% has SF > 0.4 Compression 25% of grains SF > 0.4 More grains with high SF High SF – one or two variants nucleated in compression Up to six in tension Higher number of twins in tension (cf. AE)
38
Loading mode dependence of twinning
Tension Larger fraction of grains with SF > 0 BUT only 10% has SF > 0.4 Compression 25% of grains SF > 0.4 More grains with high SF High SF twins tends to be thicker (more effective load transfer to twinning plane) Larger twinned volume in compression
39
Loading mode dep. - EPSC simulations + ND
2nd order pyramidal (<c+a>) slip More <c+a>-slip in compression – predicted by EPSC K. Máthis et al - Int. J. Plast.. (2015) DOI: /j.ijplas
40
Loading mode dep. - EPSC simulations + ND
2nd order pyramidal (<c+a>) slip More <c+a>-slip in compression – measured by ND!! K. Máthis et al - Int. J. Plast.. (2015) DOI: /j.ijplas
41
DISLOCATION ACTIVITY
42
Dislocations - EPSC simulations + AE
Common features – straining starts with basal slip, prismatic slip around yield point
43
Dislocations - EPSC simulations + AE
Common features – straining starts with basal slip, prismatic slip around yield point AE shows similar behavior
44
Dislocations - EPSC simulations + CMWP
Differences – less pronounced prismatic slip in compression cf. ND
45
Dislocations - EPSC simulations + CMWP
Differences – <c+a>-slip only in compression (exhausting of twinning) CMWP EPSC
46
EPSC modeling vs. ASK analysis of AE data
47
EPSC vs. AE REMARK EPSC Information about the relative activity of particular deformation mechanisms at a given stress level – concurrent activity included ASK analysis of AE data At a given time window (stress) only one AE source can be dominant If one source is dominant in several consecutive time window – the contributions of others decrease to zero! Comparison shown for pure Mg
48
EPSC vs. AE BASAL SLIP – activation of at low stresses;
decreasing activity above ~50 MPa
49
EPSC vs. AE NON-BASAL SLIP – dominant role at higher (>60 MPa) stresses
50
EPSC vs. AE TWINNING – onset of twinning at low applied stresses
decreasing activity with increasing stress
51
Loading mode dep. - Conclusions
More nucleated twins in tension BUT!! Larger twinned volume in compression due to fast growth of twin variants with high Schmid-factor for twinning
52
Loading mode dep. - Conclusions
More nucleated twins in tension BUT!! Larger twinned volume in compression due to fast growth of twin variants with high Schmid-factor for twinning More 2nd pyramidal slip (<c+a>) in compression exhausted twinning due to fast growth – need for a further mechanism
53
Loading mode dependence
of deformation mechanisms BIAXIAL TESTS Pure Mg, random texture 1:1, 2:1 mode Preliminary results
54
Digital image correlation
Higher deformation in the 2:1 mode
55
Acoustic emission and ND
Higher AE activity for 1:1 – more nucleated twins Intensity variation larger for 2:1 – larger twinned volume More grains involved in twinning for 1:1 BUT restricted growth – it will act against the macroscopic deformation
56
Acknowledgement The Czech Grant Agency, Grant Nr. 16-12075S
Daria Drozdenko – EBSD Matthew Barnett – SF dependence of twinning
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.