1. Multi-factorial analysis of occupational outage doses dispersion in the French NPPs 1998-2002
C. Lefaure, L . D’Ascenzo, P. Crouail, CEPN G. Cordier, J. Lebeau, A. Rocher, G. Machicoane, EDF

2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Since 1992, at EDF, many efforts in reducing occupational radiological exposures.
Without knowing what are most important factors
In depth statistical analysis of influence of factors explaining outage doses dispersion in France,
To determine which are still potential levers for continuing dose optimisation.

3. METHOD
First step: data from 137 outages (1998 – 2000);
Second step: extension to 2001 and 2002, has allowed data from 226 outages.
11 qualitative variables and
39 quantitative variables

4. reactors design features (10 variables),
METHOD
reactors design features (10 variables),
characteristics of the operation of the plants (15 variables), and
characteristics of the shutdown (15 variables),
and of the outages themselves (13 variables)
Many variables similar to those requested in the ISOE level 2 questionnaire
(materials and components, primary water chemistry and contamination levels, hot spots…)
Conception
Fonctionnement du réacteur; mise à l’arrêt; arrêt de tranche

5. METHOD
Analysis of the qualitative variables influence on outage doses,
Analysis of correlations between doses and each quantitative variable. A well as quantitative analysis of the evolutions,
Use of STATGRAPHICS Plus software.
Sample as a whole; each type of French PWR ; each major type of outages (simple refuelling outage (ASR), short maintenance outage (VP) and long ten years outage (VD)

6. QUALITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Bache RRA bore

7. QUALITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Very important impact of the design
Type of reactor (30%)
statistically significant impact of SG tubes material and fabrication, and SG channel head electropolishing
no relationship with MOX fuel, which let consider that there is no significant impact of the MOX fuel on the source term

8. QUALITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Impact of “reactor boron and water make up system” type
Two types of covers (on the 900 MWe) with air or nitrogen
No noticeable impact
Impact of hot spots presence: ± 30 % extra dose
Normalisation of doses by 1.3
Bache RRA bore

9. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Time spent in controlled area is by far the most important variable (cc >.7) at all levels of analysis
Should be important to follow other variables influencing the time spent: mishaps, reworks, fortuitous works…
Comfort the expectations from ISOE when issuing a book on “work management”
Time spent better approximates the exposed workload than length of outage in terms of days
Bache RRA bore

10. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Most other variables impacts hidden by the time spent
Use the dose index to go further
Ratio « outage dose divided by time spent »
Impact of other variables become significant to explain the dispersion of the dose index.
Bache RRA bore

11. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
The radiological state of the primary circuit (average of dose rates measured following EPRI SMRP recommendations)
Not as powerful as “time spent”, for explaining dose dispersion (role of auxiliary circuits)
But for ten years outages
Bache RRA bore

12. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
cobalt 60 very important during the first cycles
it remains a significant pollutant impacting dose rates and doses with ageing of the units as seen in the study for the 900 MWe units.
importance of stellite reduction programmes for that type of reactors
importance of reducing CO59 content in the steels at both design and modification stages.

13. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
other radio-elements potentially contributing to dose through gamma emissions, become also significant contributors for the 1300 MWe units as cobalt is less important.
It re-emphasises the importance of a circuit purification strategy not only focussed on cobalt, but adapting the chemical specifications according to the type of pollutant (Ag, Sb…).
EDF has developed such a strategy that will be now implemented.

14. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
The time spent in the controlled area by the health physicists: an important variable for the 900 MWe units.
The highest the time, the lowest are the doses with quite good correlations whatever the type of outage (ASR, VP or VD).
Why not for the 1300MWe ?
Average time +66% with smaller dispersion
How to increase time spent in the 900 Mwe units?

15. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Time spent by the managers was also introduced as a variable
Unfortunately, the correlations are quite good but positive
It does not mean that the presence of the mangers is not useful,
It just demonstrate that the longer are the outages, the highest the time spent in the controlled area by the managers and the highest the outage doses.

16. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
In a first time (three first years), the time spent in the controlled area by the individuals in charge of decontamination has appeared important for the 1300 MWe units.
Not any more the case with two more years.
It corresponds to an important reduction of the dispersion of the time spent during the different outages (by more than a factor 3).

17. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
number of rapid and important “load modifications” during the cycle, were introduced to check if the corresponding water movements may have introduced a significant oxidation and therefore an increase of the dose rates and doses.
Correlations are no more significant with these variables than wih the qualitative variable “reactor boron and water make up system” type .
This comforts the conclusions of EMMEC measurements performed by the French Atomic Energy Commission that these load modifications cannot be significantly related to the outage doses.

18. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
Another variable for checking the impact of the corrosion: the number of days during the cycle with pH lower than 6.9.
Expected that the higher that number, the higher the acidity, the corrosion in the primary circuit, the higher the dose rates nearby the primary circuit
in most situations no significant correlation with either the dose index or the radiological state of primary circuit have been observed
but for the 1300 MWe during short outages only during the first period of the analysis ( ) with both the radiological state of primary circuit and the dose index
Bache RRA bore

19. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES ANALYSIS
that sub-sample shows an important increase of the average number of days between 1999 and 2000 (from 12 days to 23) with an increase of the dispersion, while it remains stable from 2000 to 2002.
even if some phenomenon’s are obvious (impact of acidity on corrosion…) the discrepancies between the units on the selected indicators are often not enough important to show significantly that they play a role for explaining the dispersion in terms of outage doses or dose index
Bache RRA bore

20. CONCLUSION
just examples of what can be done with such a study, both in France and at the international level with ISOE2 data
It has pointed out interest of mixing qualitative and quantitative variables; descriptive statistical analysis with the analysis of correlation dispersions as well as there evolution
Bache RRA bore