1. Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016
Katie Deal

2. Today’s Call Introductions ESEA and changes to Title I, Part D
Updates from the US Department of Education
Q&A
Closing

3. U.S. Department of Education Office of Safe and Healthy Students (OSHS)
ESEA & Changes to Title I, Part D
Norris E. Dickard, Group Leader, Healthy Students
Earl Myers, Program Manager, Neglected and Delinquent Education

4. AKA- TIPD/Neglected or Delinquent Program Administered by: OESE/OSHS
Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk
AKA- TIPD/Neglected or Delinquent Program
Administered by: OESE/OSHS
2 Parts/2 Programs
Subpart 1: State Agency (SA) Program
FY 2016 Funding: $46,423,650
Subpart 2: LEA Program
FY 2016 Funding: $118,204,889

6. Sec. 1401: Purpose and Program Authorization
PURPOSE — It is the purpose of this part —
to improve educational services for children and youth in local, tribal, and State institutions for neglected or delinquent children and youth so that such children and youth have the opportunity to meet the same challenging State academic standards that all children in the State are expected to meet;
to provide such children and youth with the services needed to make a successful transition from institutionalization to further schooling or employment; and
to prevent at-risk youth from dropping out of school, and to provide dropouts, and children and youth returning from correctional facilities or institutions for neglected or delinquent children and youth, with a support system to ensure their continued education and the involvement of their families and communities.

7. Some Terminology Changes
Vocational = career and technical
Challenging State academic content standards and challenging State student achievement standards = Challenging State academic standards
Program goals, objectives, and performance measures = program objectives and outcomes
Pupil services = specialized instructional support services

8. TIPD, Subpart 1: Key Changes
Sec. 1414: (State Plan) What’s New!
Prioritize students attaining a regular high school diploma, to the extent feasible.
Assist in transition “from correctional facilities to locally operated programs” is now “between correctional facilities and locally operated programs.”
Provide new assurances on a.) procedures to ensure timely re-enrollment/re-entry ; b.) opportunities for students to participate in credit-bearing coursework.

9. TIPD, Subpart 1: Key Changes
Sec. 1414: (SA Applications) What’s New!
Describe procedures to provide, to extent practicable, for assessment upon entry to a correctional facility.
Describe how an SA will encourage facilities to coordinate with LEAs or alternative education programs, not just prior to, but after, incarceration to ensure assessments and records are shared to facilitate transitions.

10. TIPD, Subpart 1: Key Changes
Sec. 1414: (SA Applications) What’s New!
Provides an assurance that the State agency will work with children and youth who dropped out of school before entering the correctional facility or institution for neglected or delinquent children and youth to encourage the children and youth to reenter school and attain a regular high school diploma once the term of the incarceration is completed or provide the child or youth with the skills necessary to gain employment, continue the education of the child or youth, or attain a regular high school diploma or its recognized equivalent if the child or youth does not intend to return to school.
Provides an assurance that certified or licensed teachers and other qualified staff are trained to work with children and youth with disabilities and other students with special needs taking into consideration the unique needs of such students.

11. TIPD, Subpart 1: Key Changes
Sec. 1414: (SA Applications ) What’s New!
Describes how the SA will, to the extend feasible:
(A) note when a youth has come into contact with both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems; and
(B) deliver services and interventions designed to keep such youth in school that are evidence-based (to the extent a State determines that such evidence is reasonably available).

12. TIPD, Subpart 1: Key Changes
Sec. 1415: (SA Use of Funds) New!
Pay-for-Success Initiatives
www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/pay-for-success
Providing targeted services for youth who have come in contact with both the child welfare system and juvenile justice system

13. TIPD, Subpart 1: Key Changes
Sec. 1416: (Institution-Wide Projects)
Plan to describe how academic records are shared jointly between the State Agency operating an institution and LEA to facilitate transitions.
Sec. 1418: (Transition Services reservation)
May be used to support projects that facilitate the transition of children and youth between State-operated institutions, or institutions in the State operated by the Secretary of the Interior, and schools served by local educational agencies or schools operated or funded by the Bureau of Indian Education.

14. TIPD, Subpart 2: Key Changes
Sec. 1421: (Purposes) 1 of 3 amended
(3) to operate programs in local schools, including schools operated or funded by the Bureau of Indian Education, for children and youth returning from correctional facilities, and programs which may serve at-risk children and youth.

15. TIPD, Subpart 2: Key Changes
Sec. 1423: (LEA Applications) New!
A description of formal agreements, regarding the program to be assisted, between the LEA and correctional facilities and alternative school programs serving children and youth involved in the juvenile justice system, including such facilities operated by the Secretary of the Interior and Indian tribes.
A description of the program operated by participating schools to facilitate successful transitions.

16. TIPD, Subpart 2: Key Changes
Sec. 1424: (LEA use of funds) What’s New!
Programs for at-risk Indian children and youth, including such children and youth in correctional facilities in the area served by the local educational agency that are operated by the Secretary of the Interior or Indian tribes; and
Pay for success initiatives
NOTE: a local educational agency may now use a subgrant received under this subpart to carry out the activities described directly or through subgrants, contracts, or cooperative agreements.

17. TIPD, Part 2: Key Changes Sec. 1426 (Accountability) the SEA may—
reduce or terminate funding for projects under this subpart if a local educational agency does not show progress in the number of children and youth attaining a regular high school diploma or its recognized equivalent;
require correctional facilities or institutions for neglected or delinquent children and youth to demonstrate, after receiving assistance under this subpart for 3 years, that there has been an increase in the number of children and youth returning to school, attaining a regular high school diploma or its recognized equivalent, or attaining employment after such children and youth are released.

18. Definitional Change Sec. 1432 (Definitions) 1 of 4 changed
AT-RISK.—The term ‘‘at-risk’’, when used with respect to a child, youth, or student, means a school aged individual who is at-risk of academic failure, dependency adjudication, or delinquency adjudication, has a drug or alcohol problem, is pregnant or is a parent, has come into contact with the juvenile justice system or child welfare system in the past, is at least 1 year behind the expected grade level for the age of the individual, is an English learner, is a gang member, has dropped out of school in the past, or has a high absenteeism rate at school.

20. Q & A

21. Earl Myers, Program Manager, Neglected and Delinquent Education
Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting, June 2016
Earl Myers, Program Manager, Neglected and Delinquent Education

22. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
In light of declining overall numbers in secure state operated facilities due to policy, national juvenile justice reforms and practice shifts, a reconfiguration of Subpart 1 dollars should be considered to better assist the local based Subpart 1 facilities.

23. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
The timing of the October count for Subpart 2 produces relatively low numbers resulting in LEAs receiving lower funds.

24. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
More guidance is needed in regards to supporting the needs of frontier states and rural communities that have few resources.

25. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
In regards to youth detention centers that are run by American Indian or Alaskan Native tribes, can the tribe be treated as a State agency and be eligible to receive Subpart 1 funds instead of funneling money to LEAs through Subpart 2?

26. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
Since small Native American reservations lack the necessary ancillary services, can SEAs have the option of working with tribes via Subpart 1 and/or Subpart 2?

27. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
In regards to Subpart 2 funding, can a State elect to accept an amount that is less than they may be authorized based on allocations?

28. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
Please provide guidance on “supplement not supplant” requirements for Subpart 2. Although the guidance for Subpart 1 is clear, there are no such requirements for Subpart 2.

29. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
In ESSA, there seems to be a shift away from at-risk youth towards youth who are incarcerated. It would help to have clarity around this shift and what kind of impact it might have on state programs for at risk youth.

30. Responses to Questions Asked or Comments Made at NDTAC Meeting
Clarity is needed regarding homeless and other highly vulnerable youth. It would be very useful to have flexibility about how to use Title I, Part D funds at the SEA level.