1. What’s New in School Construction?
Presented by:
Jay Harris, John Brown, Luke Deets,
Brian Johanning, Rob Pitkin
Saturday, October 7th
3:40PM - 4:30PM

2. Brian Johanning, MBA, DBIA Jay Harris Rob Pitkin
John Brown, AIA, DBIA
Hollis + Miller Architects
Luke Deets
McCownGordon Construction
Brian Johanning, MBA, DBIA
Shafer, Kline & Warren
Jay Harris
Platte County School District
Rob Pitkin
Horn, Aylward and Bandy, LLC

3. 4 approved methods of construction
Design - Bid - Build (General Contractor (GC))
Construction Management “Agency”
Construction Management “At Risk”
Design-Build

4. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB 2376 / Phase I Evaluation Points assigned in phase I of the evaluation process shall not carry forward to phase II of the process. All qualified design-builders shall be ranked on points given in phases II and III only.

5. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB 2376 / Phase II Evaluation Up to twenty percent of the points awarded to each design-builder in phase II may be based on each design-builder's qualifications and ability to design, contract, and deliver the project on time and within the budget of the political subdivision; The submitted designs shall be evaluated and assigned points in accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal. Phase II shall account for not less than forty percent of the total point score as specified in the request for proposal.

6. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB 2376 / Phase III Evaluation Phase III shall account for not less than forty percent of the total point score as specified in the request for proposal Cost proposals shall be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal. In evaluating the cost proposals, the lowest responsive bidder shall be awarded the total number of points assigned to be awarded in phase III. For all other bidders, cost points shall be calculated by reducing the maximum points available in phase III by one percent or more for each percentage point by which the bidder exceeds the lowest bid and the points assigned shall be added to the points assigned for phase II for each design-builder;

7. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB 2376 / Threshold
Definitions
Civil works projects, such as roads, streets, bridges, utilities, water supply projects, water plants, wastewater plants, water distribution and wastewater conveyance facilities, airport runways and taxiways, storm drainage and flood control projects, or transit projects
(b) Non-civil works projects, such as buildings, site improvements, and other structures, habitable or not, commonly designed by architects in excess of seven million dollars;

8. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB A design criteria consultant shall be employed or retained by the political subdivision to assist in preparation of the request for proposal, perform periodic site visits, prepare progress reports, review and approve progress and final pay applications of the design-builder, review shop drawings and submissions, provide input in disputes, help interpret the construction documents, perform inspections upon substantial and final completion, assist in warranty inspections, and provide any other professional service assisting with the project administration. The design criteria consultant may also evaluate construction as to the adherence of the design criteria. The consultant shall be selected and its contract negotiated in compliance with sections to unless the consultant is a direct employee of the political subdivision.

9. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB2376 / Stipend 15. As an inducement to qualified design-builders, the political subdivision shall pay a reasonable stipend, the amount of which shall be established in the request for proposal, to each prequalified design-builder whose proposal is responsive but not accepted. Such stipend shall be no less than one-half of one percent of the total project budget. Upon payment of the stipend to any unsuccessful design-builder, the political subdivision shall acquire a nonexclusive right to use the design submitted by the design-builder, and the design-builder shall have no further liability for the use of the design by the political subdivision in any manner. If the design-builder desires to retain all rights and interest in the design proposed, the design-builder shall forfeit the stipend.

10. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
2016 HB 2376 / Sunset 20. The authority to use design-build and design-build contracts provided under this section shall expire September 1, 2025

11. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
in HB 2376
Two step selection process:
Step1: qualifications
Step 2: additional information plus fees and general conditions
Best Value selection
Maximum 60% on price (no minimum), Public ‘Rip/Read’
Minimum 40% Quals
Shall interview 2

12. Missouri Legislative Update 2017
in HB 2376 (Cont.)
Threshold for use: $2m for civil works; $3m for all other projects
may self-perform if it submits bids in same sealed proposal as other trades
Sealed trade bids publicly opened

13. 4 approved methods of Construction
Design - Bid - Build
CMa
CMr
Design-Build

14. 1
General Contractor
A system of contracting by which an architect prepares drawings, competitive bids are received and a construction contract is awarded.
School District
General Contractor
Sub
Design Team

15. ADVANTAGES: General Contractor1
ADVANTAGES: General Contractor ✔
Generally a lower cost per square foot
Most recognized delivery method
Single point construction responsibility
Allows more local GC’s to submit a bid
Less monthly paperwork for the District

16. DISADVANTAGES: General Contractor1
DISADVANTAGES: General Contractor ✗
No contractor design phase input
Difficult to control who bids the work
Subcontractors can be difficult
More site observation required
Could be more change orders

17. Construction Management “Agency”3
Construction Management “Agency”
A system involving the contractor (CM – Agency) during the program planning stage, under a separate contract from the architect, allowing for significant input on the project.
School District
Design Team
Construction Manager
Sub

18. ADVANTAGES: CM – Agency3
ADVANTAGES: CM – Agency ✔
Qualification based selection
CM is a member of the School District Team
Bid packages allow for more local participation
Generally better on follow-up issues

19. DISADVANTAGES: CM – Agency3
DISADVANTAGES: CM – Agency ✗
Possible higher construction costs
Large number of construction contracts (CM cannot self perform work)
Potential “Scope Gaps”
CM may not really be a Construction Manager

20. Construction Management “At Risk”2
Construction Management “At Risk”
School District
Construction Manager
Sub
A system involving the contractor (CM – At Risk) during the program planning stage, under a separate contract from the architect, allowing for significant input on the project.
Design Team

21. ADVANTAGES: CM – At Risk2
ADVANTAGES: CM – At Risk ✔
Qualification based selection
Early and frequent cost input from CM
CM is a member of the School District Team
Normally fewer change orders
Fewer design/construction issues
Value engineering early in the process

22. DISADVANTAGES: CM – At Risk2
DISADVANTAGES: CM – At Risk ✗
Possible higher construction costs
CM / AE roles must be well defined early in the project

23. Integrated Design-Build Team4
Design-Build
Owner
Integrated Design-Build Team
Design-Build drives the integration of design, engineering and construction processes. There is one contract for design and construction.

24. ADVANTAGES: Design-Build4
ADVANTAGES: Design-Build ✔
Single point of responsibility
Potential Cost Savings
Earlier Project Completion
Owner involvement
Earlier Cost Visibility

25. DISADVANTAGES: Design-Build4
DISADVANTAGES: Design-Build ✗
Need for earlier requirement definition
Subcontractor Compliancy

26. Overall delivery comparisonGC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility
Allows for phased “Fast Tracking”
Checks + Balances project approach
Earliest known project pricing GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility
Allows for phased “Fast Tracking”
Checks + Balances project approach
Earliest known project pricing
Subcontractor review process GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility
Allows for phased “Fast Tracking”
Checks + Balances project approach
Earliest known project pricing
Subcontractor review process
Single source for project bonding
Stretches District dollars ✔✔
✔✔✔ GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility
Allows for phased “Fast Tracking”
Checks + Balances project approach GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility
Allows for phased “Fast Tracking”
Checks + Balances project approach
Earliest known project pricing
Subcontractor review process
Single source for project bonding GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔ GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract GC
CMa
CMr DB GC
CMa
CMr DB
Qualifications based selection ✗ ✔
Provides preconstruction services
Owner holds one construction contract
Single source responsibility
Allows for phased “Fast Tracking”

27. Design-Build for Schools
250,000 SF High School
10 buildings
Stadium seating, and other site developments
Owner: Catholic Diocese of San Diego in Carmel Valley

28. Design-Build for Schools
T. C. Williams High School Alexandria, VA
LEED Gold: 3-Story 462,000 SF school + 143,000 SF garage
DBIA National Winner 2009

29. Design-Build for Schools
Episcopal High School Jacksonville, Florida
31,500 SF Design-Build Facility
650-Seat performing arts auditorium
Offices, rehearsal rooms, set shop and professional stage

30. Design-Build for Schools
Pleasant City Elementary School West Palm Beach, Florida
70,000 SF Design-Build
490-student elementary school
Designed and constructed in 12 months

31. Panel Discussion

32. Thank You! Platte County R-3 School District 816.858.5420
Horn, Alyward and Bandy, LLC
Hollis + Miller Architects McCownGordon Construction Shafer, Kline & Warren