Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
On behalf of the VIP Collaboration
On the Pauli Exclusion Principle search with VIP: some thoughts about data analyses Catalina Curceanu LNF-INFN On behalf of the VIP Collaboration FQT2015 Frascati, 23 – 25 September 2015
2
An experiment to test the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) for electrons in a clean environment (LNGS) using atomic physics methods – the VIP experiment
3
Theories of Violation of Statistics
O.W. Greenberg: AIP Conf.Proc.545: ,2004 “Possible external motivations for violation of statistics include: (a) violation of CPT, (b) violation of locality, (c) violation of Lorentz invariance, (d) extra space dimensions, (e) discrete space and/or time and (f) noncommutative spacetime. Of these (a) seems unlikely because the quon theory which obeys CPT allows violations, (b) seems likely because if locality is satisfied we can prove the spin-statistics connection and there will be no violations, (c), (d), (e) and (f) seem possible………….. Hopefully either violation will be found experimentally or our theoretical efforts will lead to understanding of why only bose and fermi statistics occur in Nature.”
4
THE VIP COLLABORATION M. Bragadireanu, T. Ponta “Horia Holubei” National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering - Bucharest, Romania M. Laubenstein Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso dell’INFN - Italy M. S. Bartalucci, S. Bertolucci, M. Catitti, C. Curceanu (Petrascu) , S. Di Matteo, C.Guaraldo, M. Iliescu, D. Pietreanu, D. L. Sirghi, F. Sirghi, L. Sperandio, O. Vazquez Doce Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell’INFN - Frascati, Italy J.-P. Egger Univ. of Neuchâtel - Neuchâtel, Switzerland E. Milotti Univ. Degli Studi di Trieste and INFN Sezione di Trieste - Trieste, Italy M. Cargnelli, T. Ishiwatari, J. Marton, E. Widmann, J. Zmeskal STEFAN MEYER Institute for Subatomic Physics - Vienna, Austria
5
Experimental method: n=2 n=2 n=1 n=1 2p –>1s transition violating
Search for anomalous X-ray transitions when bringing “new” electrons n=2 n=1 n=2 n=1 2p –>1s transition violating Pauli principle Energy 7.7 keV Normal 2p –>1s transition Energy 8.04 keV Messiah Greenberg superselection rule
6
Experimental method: n=2 n=2 n=1 n=1 2p –>1s transition violating
Search for anomalous X-ray transitions when bringing “new” electrons n=2 n=1 n=2 n=1 2p –>1s transition violating Pauli principle Energy 7.7 keV Normal 2p –>1s transition Energy 8.04 keV Messiah Greenberg superselection rule
7
The pre-VIP experiment limit: Ramberg and Snow (RS) Phys. Lett
The pre-VIP experiment limit: Ramberg and Snow (RS) Phys. Lett. B238 (1990) 438 Search for anomalous electronic transitions in Cu induced by a circulating current (“new” external electrons, which interact with the valence electrons), namely transition from 2p to 1s already filled by 2 electrons
9
The parameter Ignatiev & Kuzmin model creation and destruction operators connect 3 states - the vacuum state - the single occupancy state - the non-standard double occupancy state 0 1 2 through the following relations: The parameter quantifies the degree of violation in the transition . It is very small and for 0 we can have the Fermi - Dirac statistic again. 1 2
10
this b can be simply related to the q parameter of the quon theory of Greenberg and Mohapatra
quon algebra is a sort of weighted average between fermion and boson algebra: or also
11
The VIP experiment VIP is a much improved version of the previous (RS) experiment: sensitive, large-area, X-ray detectors: CCD di DEAR (non-triggerable…) clean, low-background experimental area (LNGS) large “electron reservoir”
12
The VIP setup
13
The VIP setup Cu Target
14
Test site and final location:
Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare LNGS
17
VIP setup at LNGS
19
Final setup at LNGS
21
VIP spectra at LNGS
22
VIP limit at LNGS (Foundation of Physics 41 (2011) 282) PEP violation
Probability: We have thus improved the limit obtained by Ramberg & Snow by a factor 400 (Foundation of Physics 41 (2011) 282)
23
The (RS) analysis proceeds by assuming that conduction electrons behave like particles in a gas, and that capture can only proceed when electrons collide with atoms. This totally neglects the quantum nature of the conduction band, and there has been repeated criticism. Given the entangled wavefunction of the conduction electrons, and the indistinguishability of the electrons, how can “new” or “fresh” electrons exist? The question can be answered in the positive if electrons can be distinguished on the basis of a sort of “effective locality”, but how can this be?
24
A possible answer is provided by decoherence of electron wavefunctions in conductors
25
Experimentally, one finds that in real conductors there is a dependence on the environment that causes decoherence, and that this destroys the expected quantum interference of the electron paths inside conductors. This decoherence is usually parameterized by an exponential factor which multiplies the interference terms and gradually suppresses them as the system evolves in time. The conclusion is that after a time of the order of the decoherence time the electron wavefunctions are effectively decoupled and the environment acts on electrons by enforcing an effective locality.
26
Decoherence appears to be related to something really fundamental, it is not just thermal effects
from P. Mohanti: "Of Decoherent Electrons and Disordered Conductors", Lecture Notes for NATO ASI, Norway ( 2001) Published in “Complexity from Microscopic to Macroscopic Scales: Coherence and Large Deviations”, NATO ASI, Edited by A. T. Skjeltorp and T. Vicsek (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001)
27
The experimental curves can be fitted with a simple phenomenological function
P. Mohanti and R. A. Webb, PRB 55 (1997) R13452
28
When we extrapolate this behavior up to room temperature we find a decoherence time ≈ 80 ps
With this decoherence time and the electron thermal speed we find a decoherence length of about 10 µm
29
Apart from solving the “fresh electron problem”, decoherence leads to an alternative analysis of experimental data slab of copper conductor z L the path of an electron defines a tube with radius equal to the decoherence length; electrons in this tube can entangle their wavefunction with the moving electron’s wavefunction tube volume number of atoms in the tube
30
During the walk from the entrance to the exit each electron would establish an entanglement with electrons up to the decoherence distance, as shown here vdrift
31
If this preliminary analysis is confirmed, it means that
the “fresh electron problem” is solved the analysis gives a much better bound (about 104 improvement) the contribution of self-diffusion is negligible if do we detect anything, then there should be a well-defined dependence on temperature
32
VIP2
33
Drawbacks of VIP: Reused an already done setup (DEAR experiment) – limitations in many aspects: signal and background No timing (trigger) capabilities Limited energy (efficiency) range (30 microns) VIP-upgrade: Use new detectors – triggerable SDD 300 microns – more efficient in a broader energy range Design a new setup – much more compact; higher acceptance (present one 2.8%) and lower background gain a factor of 100!
34
VIP physics of interest!!!
the only experiment checking PEP for elementary particle (electron) with a proper method (see VIP report) – superselection rule of Messiah - Greenberg Because we think we can improve the limit by 2 orders of magnitude (new detectors – triggerable, more compact geometry – bigger acceptance and smallr background) COST Action 1006 (EU program) Competitor experiment – S.R. Elliott et al. – Found. of Phys. -
35
SDD detectors (usati in SIDDHARTA)
37
Spin Statistics: (VIP) at LNGS
VIP limit on the probability of PEP violation: VIP-2 (to be installed at LNGS in 2014) We have thus improved the previous limit by about 2 orders of magnitude In next years: go to10-32 – (-37 ?) “Hopefully either violation will be found experimentally or our theoretical efforts will lead to understanding of why only bose and fermi statistics occur in Nature” (Greenberg)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.