1. The Ethical Community Charter School
PARCC Results: Spring 2016
Performance Levels
ELA Results & Action Plan
Math Results & Action Plan
TECCS 2015 vs. 2016
- Grade Levels
- Cohorts

2. Five Performance Levels
PARCC uses five performance levels that delineate the knowledge, skills, and practices students are able to demonstrate. Students who score a 4 or a 5 are considered on track for the next grade level. Students who score a 1, 2, or 3 may need additional support to meet expectations at the next grade level.
Level 1:
Did Not Yet Meet Expectations
Level 2: Partially Met Expectations
Level 3: Approached Expectations
Level 4: Met Expectations
Level 5: Exceeded Expectations

3. PARCC Comparison Slides
The following slides will show you how TECCS students scored on the English Language Arts section of the PARCC test.
You will see per grade how TECCS compares to Jersey City Public Schools (JCPS), New Jersey, and all of the students who took the PARCC test (PARCC States).
The bar graphs show the percentage of the student populations that scored at each Performance Level.

4. English Language Arts PARCC Results: Spring 2016 Third Grade
Fourth Grade
Fifth Grade
Sixth Grade
Seventh Grade

5. PARCC ELA Third Grade

6. PARCC 2016 – ELA Fourth Grade

7. PARCC 2016 – ELA Fifth Grade

8. PARCC 2016 – ELA Sixth Grade

9. PARCC 2016 – ELA Seventh Grade

10. PARCC 2016 – ELA % of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations
GRADE
TECCS
JCPS
New Jersey
PARCC States 3
72%
36%
47%
40% 4
69%
42%
54%
44% 5
65%
53% 6
41%
43%
52% 7
71%
57%
This graph shows the percentage of students who scored a 4 or a 5 and are therefore considered on track for the next grade level in English Language Arts. The highest percentage in each grade level is in bold.

11. ACTION PLAN - ELA
Dr. Mary McGriff, Professor-in-Residence, will continue working with staff to build skill set in Writer’s Workshop with a deeper understanding of conferencing and mini-lessons.
Teachers will continue reinforcing Daily 5 routines; focus on improving student reading stamina and vocabulary skills.
Dr. McGriff will train new teachers on the Daily 5 and provide follow up support including team teaching, modeling lessons, and attending common planning sessions.
Ensure that all teachers are differentiating and working with small reading groups.
Common planning time will be devoted to picking out major areas of weakness and reflecting on PARCC evidence statements to target instruction.

12. Mathematics PARCC Results: Spring 2016 Third Grade Fourth Grade
Fifth Grade
Sixth Grade
Seventh Grade

13. PARCC 2016 – Math Third Grade

14. PARCC 2016 – Math Fourth Grade
Last year this cohort had 43% passing & NJ had 40% (3% higher)
This year: 42% vs. 47% (5% lower)
VERY CLOSE TO STATE BOTH YEARS

15. PARCC 2016 – Math Fifth Grade
Last year this cohort had 43% passing & NJ had 40% (3% higher)
This year: 42% vs. 47% (5% lower)
VERY CLOSE TO STATE BOTH YEARS

16. PARCC 2016 – Math Sixth Grade

17. PARCC 2015 – Math Seventh Grade

18. PARCC 2016 – Math % of Students Who Met or Exceeded Expectations
GRADE
TECCS
JCPS
New Jersey
PARCC States 3
64%
35%
52%
44% 4
58%
31%
46%
37% 5
42%
33%
47%
38% 6
18%
30%
43%
34% 7
29%
28%
This graph shows the percentage of students who scored a 4 or a 5 and are therefore considered on track for the next grade level in Mathematics. The highest percentage in each grade level is in bold.

19. ACTION PLAN - Math
Teachers in grades 5-8 will pilot the Singapore Math-based program, Math in Focus. They will receive training from Math in Focus professionals throughout the year.
Our newly hired, highly experienced algebra teacher will coach K-5 teachers.
A Mathematics Coach or Professor-in-Residence will coach and model lesson for our Middle School math teachers.
Teachers will use PARCC Evidence Statement Analysis to differentiate instruction, guide lesson planning & pacing, and in creating assessments, which will be monitored and documented by administration throughout the year.
Teacher will use performance tasks to ensure that students are using mathematical reasoning to problem solve.
Teachers and administration will continue to collaborate with and learn from other schools.
-This program balances visual learning, conceptual understanding, and problem solving. This program reinforces the constructivist techniques of Math in the City, which has been a school-wide initiative to implement.
Our goal is to build a strong foundation by bridging the Everyday Math and Math in Focus programs, which will create a stronger transition between elementary and middle school. With this action item, we will be able to vertically analyze our program while connecting and reinforcing standards from grade to grade.
During Summer Institute, teachers received training on managing a student-centered classroom from Dr. Muriel Rand, NJCU professor.
Measuring Up diagnostic tests will be used by teachers to target instruction, and students will work on individual areas of weakness.
Teachers will use evidence statements provided by PARCC to guide instruction and assessment to ensure we are meeting the standards.
With the help of our ELA Professor-in-Residence, we saw dramatic increases in ELA scores. We believe that setting up a similar support system for our math teachers will have the same positive results

20. Grade Level Comparisons
PARCC Results: Spring 2015 vs. Spring 2016
English Language Arts
Mathematics

21. Grade Level Comparisons
The following slides compare how TECCS students scored in 2015 and 2016 by grade level.
These are NOT the same students.
There is no comparison for 7th grade because 2016 was our first year with that grade level.

22. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Grade Level Comparison
TECCS 2015 vs. TECCS 2016
% of student who Met or Exceeded Expectations
3 out of 4 grades increased from 2015 to 2016
Grade 6 decreased by 5 percentage points

23. MATHEMATICS Grade Level Comparison
TECCS 2015 vs. TECCS 2016
% of student who Met or Exceeded Expectations
3 out of 4 increased from 2015 to 2016
Grade 6 dropped by 15 percentage points.

24. Cohort Comparisons PARCC Results: Spring 2016 English Language Arts
Mathematics

25. Cohort Comparisons
The following slides compare how TECCS students scored in 2015 and 2016.
These ARE the same students. Percentages are based ONLY on students who took the test at TECCS both years.
For example, when looking at the class of 2020 (current 5th grade), we are comparing the scores of students who took the PARCC at TECCS when they were in 3rd grade and 4th grade.
Cohorts are listed by the year they are graduating so that we may continue to track progress each year.

26. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Cohort Comparison
2015 vs. 2016
% of student who Met or Exceeded Expectations
3 out of 4 cohorts increased from between 13 and 20 percentage points
The 2019 cohort scored the same
2020 – current 5th grade
2019 – current 6th grade
2018 – current 7th grade
2017 – current 8th grade
% differ from previous slides because we are only looking at students who tested in both 3rd and 4th grade. Eg. 4th grade % met or exceeded, but of the cohort 71% passed
SIXTH GRADE
SEVENTH GRADE

27. MATHEMATICS Cohort Comparison
THIRD GRADE
FOURTH GRADE
2015 vs. 2016
% of student who Met or Exceeded Expectations
The 2020 cohort increased by 13 percentage points
The 2019 and 2018 cohorts stayed the same
The 2017 cohort decreased by 9 percentage points
2020 – current 5th grade
2019 – current 6th grade
2018 – current 7th grade
2017 – current 8th grade
FOURTH GRADE
FIFTH GRADE
FIFTH
SIXTH
Significant difference: grade – 35% whole school vs. 20% returning students
SIXTH GRADE
SEVENTH