1. Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

2. PURPOSES OF ANALYSIS
EVALUATE EXISTING CONDITION OF STREET AND BIKE PATH PAVEMENTS
RATE STREETS AND BIKE PATHS RELATIVE TO EXISTING CONDITION
DEVELOP ALTERNATE METHODS FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/REHABILITATION
DEVELOP A MULTI YEAR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM
NEW IDOT REQUIREMENT FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO HAVE A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

3. PAVEMENT EVALUATION 95± CENTERLINE MILES OF STREETS
12.3± MILES OF BIKE PATH
PAVEMENT SURFACE EVALUATION AND RATING, “PASER” METHODOLOGY USED
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

4. PASER RATING SCALE
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

5. MOST PREDOMINATE DISTRESS TYPE
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

6. COMPARISON WITH 2003 SURVEY
Percentage of Street Area
Pavement Condition
2003
2011
Good or Better
65.5%
44.0%
Fair
34.0%
54.9%
Poor
0.5%
1.1%
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

7. James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

8. PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM The objectives of a Pavement Preservation Program are to: The strategy is to attend to pavements while they are still in good condition, before they deteriorate to a condition that requires costly major rehabilitation or reconstruction.
1) to provide an acceptable level of service by maintaining adequate smoothness and surface friction;
2) preserve the structural life of the pavement; and 3) protect the investment the Village has made in it’s street system.
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

9. PAVEMENT DETERIORATION CURVE
(for the Midwest region with seasonal changes and freeze/thaw cycles)
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

10. IMPACT OF PRESERVATION
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

11. TREATMENT METHODS OF PRESERVATION AND REHABILITATION
Crack Filling Along Edges of Pavement
Crack Sealing
Rejuvenators
Slurry Seals or Micro-Surfacing
Cold or Hot In-Place Recycling
Surface or Full Depth Patching
Minor Resurfacing
Full Depth Resurfacing
Reconstruction
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

12. RECOMMENDED TREATMENT METHODS
Crack Filling Along Edges of Pavement - $0.25/SY (In Current Program)
Crack Sealing - $0.85/SY (In Current Program)
Pavement Patching and Crack Sealing - $3.05/SY (In Current Program)
Minor Resurfacing - $15.30/SY (In Current Program)
Full Depth Resurfacing - $29.30/SY (Add to Current Program vs. waiting to reconstruct)
Reconstruction - $69.40 to $89.50/SY (As Required)
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

13. MULTI YEAR PROGRAM Period 1 – 2012 through 2017
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

14. RECOMMENDED SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS
(Maintain existing level of service)
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

15. ESTIMATED ANNUAL FUNDS NEEDED*
*Estimated annual cost is based on the recommended cycle of roadway treatments from the study – unknown pavement, soil, and drainage conditions may impact the actual numbers
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

16. CURRENT FUNDING
The Village currently receives approximately $1.075 million annually from Motor Fuel Tax and Local Gas Tax Revenue.
From that amount, approximately $800,000* is budgeted annually for pavement preservation.
*Balance of approximately $275,000 goes toward – MFT testing services, traffic sign materials, traffic light maintenance, street light poles/fixtures/bulbs/ballasts, salt, salt brine, calcium chloride, pavement markings, and bicycle path maintenance.
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

17. RECOMMENDED ROADWAY TREATMENT CYCLE
Adds Full Depth Resurfacing as a treatment to be used
Goal of maintaining the existing average level of service for the streets at 6.8
Requires additional funding beyond existing MFT revenues
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

18. CONTINUING CURRENT ROADWAY TREATMENT CYCLE
Keeps current treatment cycle (with additional patching to take place and reduced levels of resurfacing)
Based on existing MFT revenue levels
No treatments where deteriorated to a point of requiring full depth work
Necessitates a unit cost for eventual reconstruction of the roadway - reconstruction is not part of the current program
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

19. BICYCLE PATH CONDITION RATING
All of the bicycle paths were found to be in “Good” or better condition (Rating of 6 – 9)
Continue existing program of sealcoating approximately every 5 years with the recommended addition of crack sealing
Add isolated patching as needed
Annual Estimated Expenses range from $17,416 (2012) to $20,054 (2016)

20. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PAVEMENT ANALYSIS STUDY AND PRESENTATION
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

21. WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
Are you generally satisfied with the current level of service for the overall Village roadway system?
a) Examples of Street Conditions
- Paser rating examples of 5.0 to 7.0 with pictures
- Overall street system has ratings from 3.0 to 10
b) Same approximate year in service
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

22. Paser Rating 5.0
Dean Drive
Built–1968

23. Paser Rating 5.5
Stillwell Court
Built–1968

24. Paser Rating 6.0
Jackson Drive
Built–1968

25. Paser Rating 6.5
Wolfe Drive
Built–1968

26. Paser Rating 6.8 (average street in Woodridge)
63rd Street
Built–1965

27. Paser Rating 7.0
Langley Court
Built–1968

28. WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
2) What level of service do you desire in the future?
a) To maintain the average Paser rating of 6.8 need to increase
annual pavement expenditures by approximately $750,000
b) Can calculate additional expenditure needed to reach any
desired level of service
c) Can utilize the existing revenue and reduce treatments
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.

29. WORKSHOP FEEDBACK
3) Do you wish to explore alternatives of increasing funding for road maintenance?
Transfer current non-pavement preservation expenses out of the MFT fund (i.e. salt, traffic signals, etc.) to the general fund?
Decrease general fund expenses and conduct transfers into the MFT fund for pavement preservation?
Evaluate current $0.01 gas tax?
Evaluate current level of sales tax?
Evaluate classification of additional FAU routes?
Pay as You Go vs. Bonding?
Other alternatives?
James J. Benes and Associates, Inc.