Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Review of North East Essex Minor Injury Units and Walk in Centre Dr Hasan Chowhan GP & CCG Clinical lead.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Review of North East Essex Minor Injury Units and Walk in Centre Dr Hasan Chowhan GP & CCG Clinical lead."— Presentation transcript:

1 Review of North East Essex Minor Injury Units and Walk in Centre Dr Hasan Chowhan GP & CCG Clinical lead

2 Requirement from Board Members
The Board is recommended to approve Approach 3 – The Establishment of a Minor Injury Service HMC

3 Drivers for Review Continued challenging system performance Duplication and Confusion in accessing urgent care often resulting in poor patient pathways and experience Sustainability Contract Expiry dates (March 2018) > Walk in Centre (Care UK) > Minor Injury Units (Anglian Community Enterprise) HMC

4 If I need urgent treatment – what do I do?
Patient View - Accessing Urgent Care If I need urgent treatment – what do I do? How will I get there and back? Which service will get me seen the quickest? General Practice Walk in Centre Minor Injury unit NHS 111 Pharmacy GP Out of Hours Accident & Emergency 999 What service do I access? Which service is open? HMC Could I help myself? Will I need an appointment Will I be seen at a convenient time?

5 Current Patient Pathway Example
Ankle injury (Difficulty weight bearing), lives in Colchester 30 mins General Practice 111 General Practice 2 hours X-ray Walk in Centre HMC Up to 4 hours* Accident & Emergency *As per National A&E Standard

6 Primary Care Transformation
Care around the Person Self-care / Self-Management Primary Care Transformation Access to GP 7 days per week Helping people look after themselves Care Navigation GP Triage Care Closer to Home Helping people to look after themselves Single Gateway to access community care Proactive Care Planning Care Co-ordination HMC Urgent care Helping people look after themselves Helping people access the right advice or treatment in the right place, first time Consistent and high quality care 7 days a week Ensuring people are treated by staff with the right expertise to meet patient needs

7 Governance process to date
Meeting and Date Outcome 27th September 2016 CCG Board Support for draft Urgent Care Strategy Noted progress of high level appraisals of proposed approaches 24th November 2016 Final System Wide Urgent Care Strategy approved Approval of proposed approaches Approval to proceed to public engagement 31st January 2017 Update on Engagement to date Approval to continue with Engagement process 28th March 2017 Update on progress of review and next steps 25th April 2017 CCG Board Development Presentation on appraisal of approaches 2nd May 2017 Transformation & Delivery Committee Recommendation to Board on preferred approach 11th May 2017 Operational Executive Committee 30th May 2017 Update on Progress of review 27th June 2017 Decision to be made on preferred approach HMC

8 NEE System Urgent Care Strategy 2016-2019 (approved November 2016)
Helping people to look after themselves Helping people access the right advice or treatment in the right place, first time Consistent and high quality care 7 days a week Ensuring people are treated by staff with the right expertise to meet patient needs HMC

9 Our Potential Approaches
No Change to Current Services To close the current Walk in Centres and Minor Injury Units The establishment of a Minor Injury Service Only Another approach suggested by our public or stakeholders HMC

10 Approach One – Current Provision
ED Streamer 7am-10pm WIC 24 hours 9am-5pm MIU 9am-9pm WIC Average 144 Patients a day 47% of NEE urgent care activity Clacton MIU Average Patients 79 a day 25% of NEE urgent care activity Harwich MIU Average 20 Patients a day 6% of NEE urgent care activity A&E Minors Average Patients 67 day 22% of NEE urgent care activity 24 hours 9am-5pm 9am-12pm Mon-Fri 9am-5pm Mon-Fri 10am-4pm Sat/Sun HMC MIU = Minor Injury Units WIC = Walk in Centre = CHUFT X-ray service

11 68% of NEE urgent care activity
Approach Two – to close the current walk in centre and Minor injury units A&E Minors Average Patients 210 a day 68% of NEE urgent care activity ED Streamer 24 hours HMC Large areas of Rural Deprivation Significant older population on the coast Housing Developments = CHUFT X-ray service

12 What are the benefits of a Minor Injury Service?
Enhanced range of injuries treated Utilising existing buildings to maintain a local presence Able to treat non-ambulatory patients Increased ambulance conveyances to service instead of A&E Greater Integration with GP Practices (hubs) Bookable appointments using IUCS as single point of access Potential for rotational posts across UC services, maintaining high skill set HMC

13 Approach Three (Yr. 5) A Minor Injury Service A&E Minors Harwich MIS
Colchester MIS Average 77 Patients a day 23% of NEE urgent care activity Clacton Average Patients 51 a day 15% of NEE urgent care activity Harwich MIS Average 14 Patients a day 4% of NEE urgent care activity A&E Minors Average Patients a 61 day 18% of NEE urgent care activity MIS Remember it’s the 5 year population growth included in the activity. Note: MIS locations are represented on map but not drawn to scale MIS = Minor Injury Service MIS = Minor Injury Service integrated with Primary Care = CHUFT X-ray service

14 Based on the clinical model the recommendation is approach 3
HMC

15 Simon Morgan Head of Communications and Public Engagement

16 Public Engagement Engagement took place 4 Jan – 1 Mar 2017
Attended 26 support groups meetings, held 12 public meetings across north east Essex We’ve been in contact with around 2,300 people Captured feedback through online questionnaire (paper copies available) Various materials produced Independent report produced analysing key themes. SM

17 Promoting the engagement
Social media campaign Press advertising at a reduced rate in the local media Regular updated s to our voluntary groups Newsletter updates Press releases and media interviews Briefing local MPs Good support from HOSC and some local councillors. SM

18 Public engagement feedback themes
SM

19 Elizabeth Amodio Head of Urgent Care

20 Staff Capacity A perception that future changes would place additional burden on GP’s, A&E and other services with associated longer wait times Approach 3 An enhanced minor injury service delivered by staff with the right expertise, would reduce the need for you to attend A&E Increased support for people to self-care - to reduce unnecessary burden on urgent care services and GP practices Helping people to access the right service, first time will minimise the time waiting for treatment. EA

21 Location People prefer to be treated locally, without the need for hospital treatment. Longer journeys could place additional burden on patients and families Approach 3 The minor injury service would be delivered locally, aiming to be more integrated with GP Surgeries in the future An enhanced minor injury service available in the community would aim to reduce the need for you to have to travel to hospital. Recognises the local needs of the population EA

22 Access Closure of current services would impede access, with the greatest impact on those most in need. Approach 3 Recognises areas of deprivation and older age, offering a solution to retain services locally. Recognises the temporary residents and holiday maker population and provides access to urgent care services in our coastal areas. Greater focus on supporting people to self-care. Developments in primary care aims to improve access to your GP practice through introduction of extended hours (practices to offer access from 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week by March 2019) supported by consistent triage, care navigation and sign posting. EA

23 Quality of Service Walk-in Centres were perceived to provide a distinct service for patients whose needs fall between that of general Practice and A&E. People are concerned about the quality of alternative services e.g. NHS 111. Approach 3 Evidence suggests that walk in centres cater mostly for patients who did not require clinical input and could have self-cared were they better supported to do so, this approach would promote greater use of pharmacies and patient education. People with a minor illness will have greater continuity of care through improved access to their GP Practice. The approach recognises the need for a local minor injury service , able to treat a wider range of injuries. This capability reduces the need for the ambulance service to convey patients to A&E for fractures and minor injury, supporting the Ambulance service to meet their response times in attending more serious conditions The new Integrated Urgent Care Service (111 and Out of Hours GP) aims to increase the clinical advice to support patients EA

24 Changes in Service Provision
A minority of people reported that any change would not affect them, however these patients mostly lived out of the area or stated that they rarely used A&E. Funding Approach 3 aims to improve the quality of care and experience for patients through ensuring people can access the right service for their need, first time. Approach 3 aims to deliver greater financial stability through reducing the number of people attending A&E with a minor injury and improving self-care. EA

25 Approach 4 The public provided the following additional suggestions:
To develop a combination of approaches 1 & 3 with walk in centres in more locations Approach 3 aims to deliver a minor Injury service integrating with primary care in the future to provide local access for all minor urgent care needs. Approach 3 supports the driver to reduce duplication in provision of services and pathways To provide a cost effective, centralised service Approach 3 would seek to maximise the utilisation of existing estates while there is no better alternative Analysis of local need suggests that a centralised service could reduce access to care across the locality EA

26 The Financial Case Approach 1
Increase potential of £1.85m cost pressure over 5 years Assumes no void estates costs Injury £1.1m Illness £0.84m Approach 2 Increase potential of £7.55m cost pressure over 5 years Includes Void Estate costs in year one Injury £9.71m Illness -£2.16m EA Approach 3 Saving potential of £0.23m over 5 years Assumes no void estates cost as will utilise existing buildings Injury £2.77m Illness -£3.00m

27 Recommendation Based on the public engagement and financial appraisal, the recommendation is approach 3 EA then handover to HMC

28 Current Patient Pathway Example
Ankle injury (Difficulty weight bearing), lives in Colchester 30 mins General Practice 111 General Practice 2 hours X-ray Walk in Centre HMC Up to 4 hours* Accident & Emergency *As per National A&E Standard

29 Integrated Urgent Care Service (111)
Future Patient Pathway Example Ankle injury (Difficulty weight bearing), living in Colchester Integrated Urgent Care Service (111) 15 mins Direct Booking in line with the LDR General Practice Minor Injury service *Up to 4 hours HMC *Type 3 service with national 4 hour standard applied however local measure will expect high % of patients seen and treated within 2 hours

30 What about minor illness?
HMC

31 Self-care/Self-Management
Our aim is to equip as many people as we can with the skills and knowledge to support themselves both in terms of treating minor injury and ailments and how to manage their long term conditions. This will include: Development of a self-care strategy led by our community provider with system wide commitment and accountability from all local stakeholders. This will include: Staff training– ensuring that patients receive the same support and message regardless of the service they access e.g. Good Lives approach Communication – linking communication teams to support a consistent self-care message Working with Local Pharmacy Committee, including: Training for Pharmacists on safety netting to support self-care Introduction of Care Navigators within primary care HMC

32 Primary Care Impact The table below demonstrates the potential increased impact to GPs of minor illness transferring back into primary care from WICs, MIU and A&E, as assumed in Approaches 2&3*: GP (Number of appointments required per day) GP Out of Hours (Number of appointments required per day) Total appointments required per day Colchester 29 14 43 Tendring 16 6 22 For Colchester GPs this equates to an average 2 patients per day per practice For Tendring GPs this equates to an average 1 patient per day per practice HMC *The T3 Impact to GPs has been assumed based on 47% of minor illness attendances occurring in hours and 27% of out of hours attendances. Also includes 10% of Minor Injury Activity as part of Enhanced Service

33 Transformation Timeline
Maximising Benefits of an integrated system Model hub & spokes forming Buildings to support hubs under development Note: The Local Digital Roadmap (LDR) will begin to shape how information is shared to support greater integration across the system Care Navigators and extended hours will support the shift in activity for minor illness into primary care Year 17/18 Year 18/19 Year 19/20 Year 20/21 Year 21/22 Project Qrt 1 Qrt 2 Qrt 3 Qrt 4 Urgent Care Review July-18 IUCS Apr-18 Extended Hours Care Navigators Sep-17 GP Hub & Spoke Jul-17 ED Streamer Oct-17 Self-Care/Pharmacy HMC Completion of Minor Ailments Safety netting training for Pharmacists March 18 which will support shift to self-care

34 Mapped to NHSE Delivery Plan
Benefits of Approach 3 Mapped to NHSE Delivery Plan Improvement in Patient & Staff experience Reduction in minor attendance at A&E which will improve Quality of care and experience for patients Offers alternative conveyance for ambulance and supports Ambulance turnarounds Enhanced Clinical Quality Access to on-site x-ray Electronic access to patient records, diagnostics and prescribing Increase in patient safety and satisfaction Improvements in the way people access urgent care services Clear access route – through 111, GP, Ambulance and walk in Care delivered in a more convenient setting/closer to home Financial Savings Approach 3 delivers longer term financial savings through reduction in A&E attendances HMC

35 How will Approach 3 impact on the Drivers for change?
Continued challenging system performance Duplication and Confusion in accessing urgent care Sustainability Contract Expiry dates (March 2018) > Walk in Centre (Care UK) > Minor Injury Units (Anglian Community Enterprise) Approach 3 aims to reduce duplication while retaining a local presence Approach 3 aims to ensure people access the right care first time, reducing the need to attend A&E for a minor condition Approach 3 aims to deliver an integrated model, able to maximise and share the workforce and skills across the system HMC Opportunity to align contracts with the Integrated Urgent Care Service for larger scale benefits

36 Based on the Strategic fit, the recommendation is approach 3
HMC

37 Next steps Dependent on approved approach
Public Communication 28th June 2017 – 11th July 2017 Post Board Decision Decision from June Board communicated to public and stakeholders as outlined in section 5 TDC 4th July 2017 Approaches 1 & 3 Proposed Service specification(s) OEC 6th July 2017 Options Appraisal to approve Sourcing route Proposed Service Specifications Waiver to extend current contracts to align with revised milestones Approach to succession planning Approach 2 Approach to exit planning CCG Board 25th July 2017 Approaches 1 & 3 Further Quality Impact Assessment on preferred Approach HMC

38 Requirement from Board Members
The Operational Executive Committee and Transformation & Delivery Committee are recommending that the Board approve Approach 3 – The Establishment of a Minor Injury Service HMC


Download ppt "Review of North East Essex Minor Injury Units and Walk in Centre Dr Hasan Chowhan GP & CCG Clinical lead."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google