Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc"— Presentation transcript:

1 Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc
Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc. November 16, 2006

2 ASSIGNMENT Minimum of 40 interviews
Depth of understanding and support for MBREDC’s economic development agenda Test funding goal of $500,000 per year x 5 Identify possible funding sources Identify potential leadership Identify possible obstacles

3 INTERVIEW POOL Attorneys 2 Education 2 Associations 2 Accounting 1 Restaurant 1 Agribusiness 1 Technology 1 Transportation 1 Investors 1 Advertising/Marketing 1 Distributing 1 Financial Services 9 Utilities 8 Construction 5 Manufacturing 5 Real Estate 5 Developers 4 Engineers 4 Medical 3 Government 3 Retail 3 Media 3

4 INTERVIEW POOL 8 of 9 Executive Committee Members 71% of current MBREDC investors 96% of current funding 36% non-investors

5 KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Partners’ legacy broad and deep MBREDC is unknown commodity Opinion of Hugh is high Broad support for program of work but skeptical of success Enhance measurable benchmarks Good potential to grow investor base

6 MBREDC Positives New Board New, Energized Staff
Horry County 5-year commitment $400,000 annually for 2006 – 2008 Private sector match in 2009 60% private/40% public in 2010

7 CAMPAIGN CHALLENGES Partners’ History
Historically Narrow and Declining Investor Base Artificially Low Investment Benchmarks Lack of Leadership Engagement

8 NON-FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Explore Expanding Program of Work 42% cited poor infrastructure as #1 business development hindrance 17% cited need for new Target Industry Study 17% cited the need for a workforce study and professional workforce recruitment 11% cited the need for a plan to bring local industry, CCU, HTC and MBREDC together to address workforce needs Expand/Enhance Measurements

9 NON-FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Adjust and Enhance Investment Levels Governance Adjustments Investor Engagement Via Committees Education, Education, Education!!!

10

11 Top 14 vs. Total Income

12 Top 14 Projected Top 14 Minimum Stretch Santee Cooper $40,000
Current Top 14 Santee Cooper $40,000 Coastal Carolina University $15,000 Horry Telephone $7,500 Verizon $7,500 Bank of America $5,000 BB&T $5,000 Burroughs & Chapin $5,000 Conway Medical Center $5,000 Conway National Bank $5,000 Horry Electric $5,000 Loris Community Hosptial $5,000 Metglas $5,000 Myrtle Beach Chamber $5,000 Time Warner $5,000 Total $120,000 Projected Top Minimum Stretch Santee Cooper $40,000 $40,000 Burroughs & Chapin $20,000 $25,000 Horry Telephone Coop $10,000 $20,000 G. S. Water Authority $10,000 $15,000 Conway National Bank $10,000 $15,000 Horry Electric Coop $10, $15,000 Wachovia Bank $10, $15,000 Bank of America $10, $10,000 BB&T $10, $10,000 The Jackson Companies $5, $10,000 Conway Medical Center $10, $10,000 CCU $15,000 $15,000 Loris Community Hospital $10, $10,000 Verizon $7,500 $10,000 Total $177,500 $220,000

13 RECOMMENDATIONS FUNDING ALLOCATIONS

14 PRIVATE SECTOR REVENUE POTENTIAL
Guarantee: $1.5 million $300,000 per year 5 year spread (2007 – 2011) 85% annual increase in current private sector support Recommended Public Goal: $2 million $400,000 per year

15 HOW DO WE DO IT? Elevate investments of current base
Broaden the investor base (30% - 40%) Investor and community outreach/education

16 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Reminder Horry County 5-year commitment
$400,000 annually for 2006 – 2008 Private sector match in 2009 60% private/40% public in 2010

17 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Projected Net Funding minus RDG Fee in
Status Quo $300,000 $400,000 FY 07/08 $562,000 $592,000 $692,000 FY 08/09 $562,000 $664,000 $764,000 FY 09/10 $324,000 $600,000 $800,000 FY 10/11 $267,000 $500,000 $667,000 FY 11/12 $267,000 $500,000 $667,000 Total $1,982,000 $2,856,000 $3,590,000 Annual Average $396,400 $571,200 $718,000

18 Benchmark Communities
Cities Campaign I Campaign II Wichita, KS $3.5 million $8 million Pensacola, FL $2.5 million $5 million Rocky Mount, NC $1.5 million $4 million Lexington, KY $2.5 million $5 million Shreveport, LA $1.1 million $3.5 million

19

20 CAMPAIGN LEADERSHIP Honorary Co-Chairs Campaign “working group”
MBERDC Executive Committee Advice, counsel, assistance and oversight

21 NEXT STEPS Identify and Recruit leadership Screen Top 50 Prospects
Prepare collateral materials Commence community outreach/education

22 Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc
Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc. November 16, 2006


Download ppt "Campaign Assessment Report Resource Development Group, Inc"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google