Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKimberly Simon Modified over 6 years ago
1
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS ON TALL BUILDINGS Dr. Ravindra Nagar M
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS ON TALL BUILDINGS Dr. Ravindra Nagar M.tech(IIT Delhi),PhD(Liverpool) Professor Department of Structural Engineering Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur (India)
4
Underlying Physics Newton’s Second Law F = ma
where m = mass of building a = acceleration of ground ground acceleration Question: What do the physics tell us about the magnitude of the forces that different types of buildings feel during an earthquake?
5
What is really happening?
F is known as an inertial force, created by building's tendency to remain at rest, in its original position, although the ground beneath it is moving F Engineering representation of earthquake force
6
Period and Frequency T = 1 / f
Frequency (f) = number of complete cycles of vibration per second Period (T) = time needed to complete one full cycle of vibration T = 1 / f
7
Idealized Model of Building
k m T = 2π smaller k k m increase building period k m bigger m
8
Modes of Building Failure
9
RESONANCE
10
Typical Natural Period
Natural Period of Buildings Each building has its own natural period (frequency) Building Height Typical Natural Period Natural Frequency 2 story 0.2 seconds 5 cycles/sec 5 story 0.5 seconds ? 10 story 1.0 seconds 20 story 2.0 seconds 30 story 3.0 seconds slower shaking
12
Example: Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985
RESONANCE Resonance = frequency content of the ground motion is close to building's natural frequency tends to increase or amplify building response building suffers the greatest damage from ground motion at a frequency close or equal to its own natural frequency Example: Mexico City earthquake of September 19, 1985 majority of buildings that collapsed were around 20 stories tall natural period of around 2.0 seconds other buildings, of different heights and different natural frequencies, were undamaged even though located right next to damaged 20 story buildings
13
SOFT FIRST STOREY CAR PARK WEAK STOREY
14
BENDING MOMENTS IN COLUMNS AND JOINTS
LATERAL FORCE MAXIMUM MOMENTS AT JOINT MAXIMUM MOMENTS ON SOFT STOREY SITUATION CRITICAL IF SOFT STOREY IS DOUBLE HEIGHT
15
Soft first story failure
16
Soft first story failure
17
Weak story failure, Kobe, 1995
18
BENDING MOMENTS IN COLUMNS AND JOINTS
BENDING FAILURE BENDING MOMENTS IN COLUMNS AND JOINTS LATERAL FORCE MAXIMUM MOMENTS AT JOINT MAXIMUM MOMENTS ON SOFT STOREY
19
DEFLECTION LATERAL FORCE CODE LIMITS DEFLECTION TO HEIGHT/500
20
Bending
21
Bending
22
PLINTH BEAM LATERAL FORCE PLINTH BEAM CUTS EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF COLUMN
23
HIGH CENTER OF MASS SWIMMING POOL OR WATER TANK AT TOP
LATERAL FORCE MOMENTS ARE PROPORTIONAL TO DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM MOMENTS ARE PROPORTIONAL TO MASS
24
High center of mass
25
Falling objects
26
Falling objects, partial wall collapse
27
Falling objects, partial wall collapse
28
FAILURES DUE TO SOIL STRATA
29
SEPTEMBER 19, 1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE
30
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER LOCATED 240 KM FROM MEXICO CITY
400 BUILDINGS COLLAPSED IN OLD LAKE BED ZONE OF MEXICO CITY SOIL-STRUCTURE RESONANCE IN OLD LAKE BED ZONE WAS A MAJOR FACTOR
31
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: SOIL AMPLIFICATION
32
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: CRITICAL STRUCTURES--HOSPITALS
33
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: ESSENTIAL STRUCTURES--SCHOOLS
34
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: STEEL FRAME BUILDING
35
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: POUNDING
36
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: NUEVA LEON APARTMENT BUILDINGS
37
1985 MEXICO EARTHQUAKE: RAILROAD SYSTEM
40
Liquefaction, ground failure
41
Liquefaction, ground failure
42
Liquefaction, ground failure
43
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION IS A MUST FOR EVERY SITE AS SOIL IS WEAKEST MATERIAL IN THE SYSTEM AND THE FAILURE IS SUDDEN AND OFTEN LEADS TO COLLAPSE FOOTINGS ON SANDY SOILS SHOW IMMEDIATE SETTELMENTS WHEREAS CLAYS SHOW LONG TERM SETTELMENTS CLAYS ARE VERY STIFF WHEN DRY BUT CAN BECOME VERY SOFT WHEN SUBMERGED RISE IN WATER TABLE CAN REDUCE THE BEARING CAPACITY SIGNIFICANTLY CLAYS EXHIBITSWELLING PRESSURES PLACE THE FOUNDATION ON FIRM SOIL
44
TYPE OF FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR SESMIC RESPONSE
ISOLATED FOOTINGS POOR PROVIDE TIE BEAMS COMBINED FOOTINGS FAIR RAFT FOUNDATIONS BETTER PILE FOUNDATIONS BEST
45
Column failure
46
Base Isolated Buildings
Supported by a series of bearing pads placed between the building and its foundation Most of deformation in isolators and acceleration of the building is reduced = less damage isolated not isolated
47
Bay Area Base-Isolated Buildings
U.S. Court of Appeals, San Francisco Survived 1906 earthquake (seismic retrofit 1994) San Francisco City Hall Steel frame with stone exterior (seismic retrofit 1994)
48
EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION Prediction as a means of saving human lives in earthquakes is extremely unreliable at present For saving economic losses it will be utterly useless (Seismologically weak buildings and structures remain liable to catastrophic behaviour during strong earthquakes).
49
EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ZONES 2002
Zone V MM IX or more “ IV MM VIII “ III MM VII Zone II MM VI “ I MM V or less together now make Zone II MM VI or less Area under the zones V 12% IV 18% III ~27% Table damageable ~ 57%
50
BUILDING TYPES IN INDIA
51
SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF BUILDINGS
52
VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS
If Reconstruction cost = 100% Loss Ratio Damage Grade > 75% Collapse G5 % Destruction incl. Partial G4 Collapse 30– 45% Moderate Damage G3 < 30% Low Damage G2 Reinforcing of masonry buildings lowers loss ratio by 12-15%, hence to Damage of G3 or lower.
53
ASSESSMENT OF LOSSES Direct Damage- Damages to fixed assets, and inventories of finished and semifinished goods, raw materials, and spare parts. Indirect Damage-Indirect losses are measured in montetary, non- physical, terms and may include, among others, the following: - Increased operational expenditure due to the destruction of physical infrastructure -Additional costs incurred in transportation (alternate routes longer than normal routes). - Increased costs for providing services - Loss of corporate income as a result of the inability to provide services, such as utilities, - Loss of personal income due to total or partial loss of means of livelihood. - Unexpected expenditures related to health and hygien. - Loss of production of industry destroyed, and to suppliers and purchasers. The indirect losses mostly occur resulting from Direct damages. Prevention or minimization of direct physical damage will certainly reduce the indirect losses also in a big way, hence the critical importance of engineering intervention.
54
BUILDING CODES FOR ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION
IS: "Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part I (Fifth Revision)" July 2002. IS: "Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic forces - Code of Practice" November 1993. IS: "Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings - Code of Practice (Second Revision)" October 1993. Many Good Books Large Nos. of Conference Proceedings
55
GUIDELINES FOR NON-ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION
IS: :Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings – Code of Practice (Second Revision)” October 1993. IS: "Improving Earthquake Resistance of Low Strength Masonry Building - Guidelines" August 1993. IS: "Improving Earthquake Resistance of Earthen Buildings- Guidelines" October 1993. Arya A.S. et al, Earthquake Resistant Non-Engineered Construction, Monograph Pub. by International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 1980, Revised 1986 (translated into Spanish for use in various Spanish countries). Arya A.S., Protection of Educational Buildings in Seismic Areas, Digest 13, Pub. by UNESCO,Bangkok, 1987 (translated into Persian for use in Iran). Guidelines–Pub. by BMTPC, Ministry of Urban Affairs & Employment, Government of India after Jabalpur and Chamoli Earthquakes. Guidelines-Pub. By Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, (GSDMA) Ghandinagar after Kachchh earthquake in Gujarat (authored by Dr. A.S. Arya).
56
RETROFITTING STRATEGY FOR EXISTING CONSTRUCTIONS
Priority - I. Area under Seismic Zones V and IV, (a) Buildings: The following and others to be identified: (i) Instructional, laboratory and library buildings of educational institutions (schools, colleges, institutes and Universities). (ii) Hospitals including wards, dispensaries, clinics, etc. (iii) Congregation halls, temples, churches, cinemas, theatres etc. (iv)Residences of VIP's and top administrative officers in the districts (Collector, SP, CMO and the like needed for immediate Response (b) Service Structures & Infrastructure: The following among others: (i) Water tanks and towers (ii) Telephone exchanges, fire stations, water supply pump houses (iii) Bridges and culverts (iv) Electric power houses and substations (v) Monuments, Heritage Buildings, Museums (vi) Critical and Hazardous industries (vii) Railway stations, Airport buildings and towers Priority – II – Area under Seismic Zone III (As above)
57
BENEFIT/COST OF SEISMIC RESISTANCE
Extra cost in providing Seismic Resistance Building Masonry RCC framed Buildings in in Cement Mortar storeyed Zone III – 2 % – 3.2 % Zone IV – 4 % – 4.0 % Zone V – 6 % – 6.0 %
58
CONCLUSION Carry out the engineering, architecture and planning measures - Land use zoning. - Planning of habitat, - Implementation of building codes in all new constructions, and - seismic retrofitting of existing buildings and infrastructure. Create the supportive structure of - public awareness, - education and training - research and development about the safety from earthquake hazard. Appropriate policy, financial and institutional support at national and state levels need to be provided for putting this strategy into a workable action plan.
59
THANKS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.