Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nicolette Pekeur (UCT) Supervisors: Prof

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nicolette Pekeur (UCT) Supervisors: Prof"— Presentation transcript:

1 Investigating the relationship between the HI and optical diameter of a sample of LVHIS galaxies
Nicolette Pekeur (UCT) Supervisors: Prof. Renee Kraan-Korterweg (UCT), Prof. Erwin de Blok (UCT) and Dr. Baerbel Koribalski (ATNF)

2 Outline Introduction Sample Definition Aim Results & Conclusions
Summary Future Prospects

3 Introduction Not clear how small-scale galaxy processes determine the large-scale structure of a galaxy. Not even clear how Mpc environment is correlated with the kpc HI disk. Examining how the HI disk of a galaxy depends on various galaxy properties, presents a first step towards understanding how it is formed.

4 Sample definition Subsample of the Local Volume HI Survey (LVHIS; Koribalski et al., 2008). HI selected (HIPASS; Barnes et al., 2001) All morphological types. Volume-limited (D≤10 Mpc-LV; dwarf galaxies). Observations with ATCA sensitivity ~1 mJy and resolution ~1’. Motivation: Test previous studies that selects against faint galaxies. Pilot study.

5 Aim Investigate the relationship between the HI and optical diameter of 19 galaxies from LVHIS. The HI diameter is also correlated with the HI mass, HI mass- to-light ratio and environment.

6 Results HI properties were obtained at 3 HI column density levels (NHI=2.5E19 (~3σ), 8.0E19 and 2.5E20 cm2). Only review results obtained for the outermost HI diameter (NHI=2.5E19 cm-2). HI- vs. Optical Diameter HI Mass HI Mass-to-Light Ratio

7 HI Diameter vs. Optical Diameter
The HI diameter (DHI) measured at NHI=2.5E19 cm-2. Optical diameter (Dopt), defined at μB=25 and 26 mag arcsec-2, D25B and D26B. log(DHI)=0(.55 ±0.13)log(D25B)+(1.48±0.29) log(DHI)=(0.66±0.21) log(D26B)+(1.11±0.52)

8 Conclusion I The HI and optical diameter is strongly correlated.
DHI> Dopt for all galaxies. NHI (cm-2) μB (mag arcsec-2) DHI/Dopt Sample 2.5×1019 25 3.2±0.5 LVHIS 1.25×1020 3.3±1.5 WHISP1 26 2.0±0.3 1019 26.5 2.4±0.1 FIGGS2 References: 1. Swaters et al. (2002) The Westerbork HI Survey of Spiral and Irregular galaxies I. 2. Begum et al. (2008) FIGGS: Faint Irregular Galaxies GMRT Survey Overview, Observations and First Results

9 HI Mass vs. HI Diameter Examine the HI mass (MHI) as a function of HI diameter by computing the HI mass inside the diameter. log (MHI) = (2.00±0.16) log(DHI)+(6.15 ±0.18)

10 Conclusion II log(MHI)=(1.99±0.11) log(DHI)+(6.08±0.06)
HI mass is proportional to the square of the HI diameter. The fitted relation is, log(MHI)=(2.00±0.16) log(DHI)+(6.15±0.18) FIGGS galaxies, log(MHI)=(1.99±0.11) log(DHI)+(6.08±0.06) MHI α D2HI  the HI surface density is constant when it is averaged over the HI disk. ΣHI=(1.8±0.2) M pc-2 Spread in ΣHI is due to local density variations  presence of a central bar (~60%).

11 HI mass-to-light ratio
Measures the relative amounts of HI gas and stars (relative HI content). Comparing the relative HI content with the HI-to-optical diameter ratio determine effect of star formation and the star formation rate on the HI diameter.

12 Relative HI content vs. HI-to-optical diameter ratio

13 Conclusion III More extended galaxies have higher HI mass-to-light ratios. MHI/LB (solar units) Sample 0.9±0.2 LVHIS 1.5 WHISP1 5.0 FIGGS2 References: 1. Swaters et al. (2002) The Westerbork HI Survey of Spiral and Irregular galaxies I. 2. Begum et al. (2008) FIGGS: Faint Irregular Galaxies GMRT Survey Overview, Observations and First Results

14 Summary Results agree with literature.
Pilot study LVHIS data is reliable. What are the HI properties of all LVHIS galaxies? (Koribalski et al., 2008/2009)

15 Future Prospects HI properties of all LVHIS galaxies means:
Reduce statistical error increasing the sample size. Majority of galaxies studied here, are late-type galaxies. Expand our results to all morphological types (with detectable HI). Definitive results for environmental effects. Most of the galaxies are isolated. MeerKAT and ASKAP much more complete LV census. Estimated increase in the number of LV members, ~4 times the current known value (Staveley-Smith, 2008).

16 Future Prospects (cont.)
R-band optical diameter instead of B-band optical diameter.

17 Thank You


Download ppt "Nicolette Pekeur (UCT) Supervisors: Prof"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google